On 11/09/2016 12:47 AM, Joseph wrote:
 > On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 2:51:58 AM UTC-5, Michael Christ 
wrote:
 >> On 10/09/2016 2:21 PM, Joseph wrote:
 >>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Christ 
wrote:
 >>>> On 10/09/2016 12:33 PM, Joseph wrote:
 >>>>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 4:43:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Christ 
wrote:
 >>>>>> On 10/09/2016 3:06 AM, Joseph wrote:
 >>>>>>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 9:25:40 AM UTC-5, Debra Dee 
McQueen Freeman wrote:
 >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 10:19:19 PM UTC-4, Joseph 
wrote:
 >>>>>>>>
 >>>>>>>>> This goes for every one of you, even Debz My promise to the 
Flock,
 >>>>>>>>> from the prophet of God
 >>>>>>>>>
 >>>> Alright, Jo Bro, I like your softness.  .
 >> Version!  .
Yes, well I have only just met your personage.
 > God would have never given all this to me in the first place if He 
believed i was going to try to >twist things around. I try to be a 
straight-shooter and tell it exactly as i see it no matter how unpopular 
it may be. (and i got this HUGE following to prove it...ROFL!!)
 > *No worries there.  I think I have 3.
Well, you are doing well!
 > Plus it is the bible the Lord led me to many years ago.  Thank God 
you didn't say the New >International Version!  .
 >  == Yeah i'm not a big NIV fan either nor any of the newer 
translations because they have >removed some very critical parts of the 
Bibles prophetic message. Especially the word 'and' that >can and does 
mean 'also' in a lot of areas. What i've seen is many of them have 
changed it to suit >their own beliefs like the 26th verse of Daniel 
chapter 8 that they have all pluralized in order to >make it fit verse 
14, but in so doing it has taken away its real meaning.
 > The Vision of the Evening and the Morning is singular in nature just 
like its written and its >referring to the dual historical vision 
itself. The Evening is referring to the latter day part of the >vision 
which is spoken of first, whereas the Morning is the Histical part of it 
and it was mentioned >second just as i've explained it all before. 
Switch the two era's around and the dividing point is the >middle of 
verse 5. The NIV also took out the And word in verse 2, giving the verse 
only one >possible meaning but its actually talking about 2 visions, one 
by the river Ulai and one while he >was in the Temple. Argh, I could go 
on about this one all day..
I can see 'And' taken out would take out context.
 > * Yeah, no worries.  But I am expecting you to basically reveal the 
truth. Remember the emphasis >is more about you revealing the truth you 
say you have than me studying for myself to draw my >own conclusions.  I 
am a vessel that you pour into. Doing what's right in my own eyes is not 
the >way of a student.  Yet I understand there is leg work.
 >  == The leg work has all been done, now its only a matter of you 
believing that what i tell you. >And if i tell you something, dont go 
running to the commentaries because they have no earthly >idea about 
what i'm talking about. Remember, it was 'shut up' till the end of time 
and that meant >just prior to the events themselves.
Okay.
 > *Dan 12:4  But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, 
even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge 
shall be increased. Interesting verse.
 > Shutting and sealing the book even to the time of the end.  Meaning??
 > To be un-shut and unsealed at veritably the end of days??
 > == Meaning till the 'very' end... and thats why its semi-unsettling 
when i do start getting a witness >or two because thats an indicator to 
me that the prophecied events are drawing ever closer. daniel >shut up 
the words by dividing the last two chapters and making them into four of 
them. Then he >switched chapters (parchments) 10 and 11 and that is what 
we are seeing. So they have to be >switched back, then chapters 9 and 11 
needs to be re-attached and the same thing goes for chapters >10 and 12. 
Now you only have 'two' chapters instead of four (9/11,10/12) and that 
my Friend is the >Foundation to all end times Biblically related prophecy.
Okay, I will read Daniel that way.
 >   * Fallen man is running to and fro, like his father, and knowledge 
growing exponentially that is for sure.
 >  == This is true
 > *Okay, where to I read your Restoration Theory of Daniel?
 >  == What i've been trying to show you guys is the words of Daniels 
end times prophecies are out >of sequence and so is the vision mentioned 
in chapter 8 of Daniel. And in both instances they have >to be 
'Restored' back to their original condition in order for any of us to 
understand what its talking >about. Enter my Restoration theory that 
sets both the Vision of chapter 8 and the Words of chapter >12 (the only 
2 places in which Daniel was told to shut something up) in order so the 
prophecies >can finally be seen for what they really are. In so doing 
you have completely re-written the >prophecies and now everything points 
directly at the United States and out involvement in the >Middle east, 
and even explains the situation like nothing of its kind anywhere else 
in the Bible.
 >  So while the Church as a whole are still very much focused on the 
Pope and the european Union >and such, yada yada, the real Snake has a 
"Persian" smell to it, and it stinks to high Heavens! I >have seen a 
select few who have put Iran into the equason built off other Scriptures 
throughout the >Bible, and that is good. But they still don't know the 
sequence of events and that part can only be >made possible through my 
Restoration theory of Daniel.
Righto, I will go do what I said...you said.  So you think the USA and 
Iran figure in things? Well, considering its Jewish connections to 
Israel, I can see the USA being involved, though everyone might be 
involved.  By the way, I worked on a Kibbutzim in Israel for 3 months 
some years ago and there were Americans all over the place, living there.
Though, don't be surprised if the Lord comes out of left field.