On 11/09/2016 12:47 AM, Joseph wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 2:51:58 AM UTC-5, Michael Christ
wrote:
>> On 10/09/2016 2:21 PM, Joseph wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 10:09:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Christ
wrote:
>>>> On 10/09/2016 12:33 PM, Joseph wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 4:43:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Christ
wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/09/2016 3:06 AM, Joseph wrote:
>>>>>>> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 9:25:40 AM UTC-5, Debra Dee
McQueen Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 10:19:19 PM UTC-4, Joseph
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This goes for every one of you, even Debz My promise to the
Flock,
>>>>>>>>> from the prophet of God
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> Alright, Jo Bro, I like your softness. .
>> Version! .
Yes, well I have only just met your personage.
> God would have never given all this to me in the first place if He
believed i was going to try to >twist things around. I try to be a
straight-shooter and tell it exactly as i see it no matter how unpopular
it may be. (and i got this HUGE following to prove it...ROFL!!)
> *No worries there. I think I have 3.
Well, you are doing well!
> Plus it is the bible the Lord led me to many years ago. Thank God
you didn't say the New >International Version! .
> == Yeah i'm not a big NIV fan either nor any of the newer
translations because they have >removed some very critical parts of the
Bibles prophetic message. Especially the word 'and' that >can and does
mean 'also' in a lot of areas. What i've seen is many of them have
changed it to suit >their own beliefs like the 26th verse of Daniel
chapter 8 that they have all pluralized in order to >make it fit verse
14, but in so doing it has taken away its real meaning.
> The Vision of the Evening and the Morning is singular in nature just
like its written and its >referring to the dual historical vision
itself. The Evening is referring to the latter day part of the >vision
which is spoken of first, whereas the Morning is the Histical part of it
and it was mentioned >second just as i've explained it all before.
Switch the two era's around and the dividing point is the >middle of
verse 5. The NIV also took out the And word in verse 2, giving the verse
only one >possible meaning but its actually talking about 2 visions, one
by the river Ulai and one while he >was in the Temple. Argh, I could go
on about this one all day..
I can see 'And' taken out would take out context.
> * Yeah, no worries. But I am expecting you to basically reveal the
truth. Remember the emphasis >is more about you revealing the truth you
say you have than me studying for myself to draw my >own conclusions. I
am a vessel that you pour into. Doing what's right in my own eyes is not
the >way of a student. Yet I understand there is leg work.
> == The leg work has all been done, now its only a matter of you
believing that what i tell you. >And if i tell you something, dont go
running to the commentaries because they have no earthly >idea about
what i'm talking about. Remember, it was 'shut up' till the end of time
and that meant >just prior to the events themselves.
Okay.
> *Dan 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book,
even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge
shall be increased. Interesting verse.
> Shutting and sealing the book even to the time of the end. Meaning??
> To be un-shut and unsealed at veritably the end of days??
> == Meaning till the 'very' end... and thats why its semi-unsettling
when i do start getting a witness >or two because thats an indicator to
me that the prophecied events are drawing ever closer. daniel >shut up
the words by dividing the last two chapters and making them into four of
them. Then he >switched chapters (parchments) 10 and 11 and that is what
we are seeing. So they have to be >switched back, then chapters 9 and 11
needs to be re-attached and the same thing goes for chapters >10 and 12.
Now you only have 'two' chapters instead of four (9/11,10/12) and that
my Friend is the >Foundation to all end times Biblically related prophecy.
Okay, I will read Daniel that way.
> * Fallen man is running to and fro, like his father, and knowledge
growing exponentially that is for sure.
> == This is true
> *Okay, where to I read your Restoration Theory of Daniel?
> == What i've been trying to show you guys is the words of Daniels
end times prophecies are out >of sequence and so is the vision mentioned
in chapter 8 of Daniel. And in both instances they have >to be
'Restored' back to their original condition in order for any of us to
understand what its talking >about. Enter my Restoration theory that
sets both the Vision of chapter 8 and the Words of chapter >12 (the only
2 places in which Daniel was told to shut something up) in order so the
prophecies >can finally be seen for what they really are. In so doing
you have completely re-written the >prophecies and now everything points
directly at the United States and out involvement in the >Middle east,
and even explains the situation like nothing of its kind anywhere else
in the Bible.
> So while the Church as a whole are still very much focused on the
Pope and the european Union >and such, yada yada, the real Snake has a
"Persian" smell to it, and it stinks to high Heavens! I >have seen a
select few who have put Iran into the equason built off other Scriptures
throughout the >Bible, and that is good. But they still don't know the
sequence of events and that part can only be >made possible through my
Restoration theory of Daniel.
Righto, I will go do what I said...you said. So you think the USA and
Iran figure in things? Well, considering its Jewish connections to
Israel, I can see the USA being involved, though everyone might be
involved. By the way, I worked on a Kibbutzim in Israel for 3 months
some years ago and there were Americans all over the place, living there.
Though, don't be surprised if the Lord comes out of left field.