charter
Trifle Menot
Another ng, alt.bbs.sysops (plural s) is carried by the server I now
use, but with very little traffic. It seems to be invisible on google
groups, which could be an advantage.
If anyone is interested in re-chartering that group, or this one, please
speak. I don't forsee much opposition from the original founders.
--
Web mail, POP3, and SMTP
http://www.beewyz.com/freeaccounts.php
Lord Time
In a reply from Trifle Menot on 20:46 about charter
TM> Another ng, alt.bbs.sysops (plural s) is carried by the server I now
TM> use, but with very little traffic. It seems to be invisible on google
TM> groups, which could be an advantage.
hmmm, the isp I use has it
TM> If anyone is interested in re-chartering that group, or this one, please
TM> speak. I don't forsee much opposition from the original founders.
have at it :)
---
Rob Starr
Lord Time SysOp of Time Warp of the Future BBS
telnet://time.synchro.net:24
ICQ # 11868133 Yahoo : lordtime2000
AIM : LordTime20000 MSN : Lord Time
Jabber : lordti...@gmail.com Astra : lord_time
* CMPQwk 1.42-R2 16554 * The Ultimate Apple // Offline Reader for the Apple.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
* Time Warp of the Future BBS - Cougar, Washington - telnet://time.synchro.net
Trifle Menot
<lord...@time.synchro.net.remove-dl8-this> wrote:
>TM> Another ng, alt.bbs.sysops (plural s) is carried by the server I now
>TM> use, but with very little traffic. It seems to be invisible on google
>TM> groups, which could be an advantage.
>
>hmmm, the isp I use has it
>
>TM> If anyone is interested in re-chartering that group, or this one, please
>TM> speak. I don't forsee much opposition from the original founders.
>
>have at it :)
I have some ideas, but it's no fun talking to myself. If anyone else
wants to participate, now would be a good time to express your interest.
My basic idea is to start some regular discussion, regarding BBS past,
present, or future, on most any variety of topic. There's so little BBS
ng traffic nowdays, the topics could be fairly broad, with little danger
of ng overload.
Freejack
Re: Re: charter
By: Trifle Menot to alt.bbs.sysop on Sun Feb 07 2010 23:00:55
> From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.sysop
>
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:33:26 GMT, "Lord Time"
> <lord...@time.synchro.net.remove-dl8-this> wrote:
>
> >TM> Another ng, alt.bbs.sysops (plural s) is carried by the server I now
> >TM> use, but with very little traffic. It seems to be invisible on google
> >TM> groups, which could be an advantage.
> >
> >hmmm, the isp I use has it
> >
> >TM> If anyone is interested in re-chartering that group, or this one, pleas
> >TM> speak. I don't forsee much opposition from the original founders.
> >
> >have at it :)
>
> I have some ideas, but it's no fun talking to myself. If anyone else
> wants to participate, now would be a good time to express your interest.
>
> My basic idea is to start some regular discussion, regarding BBS past,
> present, or future, on most any variety of topic. There's so little BBS
> ng traffic nowdays, the topics could be fairly broad, with little danger
> of ng overload.
>
>
> --
> Web mail, POP3, and SMTP
> http://www.beewyz.com/freeaccounts.php
>
> --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.85
Could do BBS comparisions and styles.....jsut a thought.
Freejack
Freejacks BBS - telnet://fjbbs.gotdns.com - Technical Manuals, HowTo's and
Support for Networking, Virus
Removal
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.85
* Freejacks BBS - Hueytown, AL - telnet://fjbbs.gotdns.com
Trifle Menot
<free...@fjbbs.gotdns.com.remove-d0-this> wrote:
> > My basic idea is to start some regular discussion, regarding BBS past,
> > present, or future, on most any variety of topic. There's so little BBS
> > ng traffic nowdays, the topics could be fairly broad, with little danger
> > of ng overload.
> Could do BBS comparisions and styles.....jsut a thought.
Sure. Whatever you like. As long as it's somehow related to BBS.
I think a charter needs to address some technical issues first. Two
that come to mind:
1) Top posting
Should be discouraged. Nothing can be enforced in an unmoderated group,
but shunning offenders is an effective social tool.
2) Contact info
Posting an unmangled, working email address is preferred. Like netmail,
you may need a private channel sometimes. You need not reveal your true
identity. Use an alter ego if you like. But please use a working email
address that you check regularly.
If your ISP does not provide effective SPAM control, you can get a free
email account at the mail service in my sig. I use it, works for me.
Alexander Grotewohl
Trifle Menot
wrote:
>what? top posting? :)
>> 1) Top posting
>>
>> Should be discouraged. Nothing can be enforced in an unmoderated group,
>> but shunning offenders is an effective social tool.
You are hereby shunned. ;-)