What happened all of the lefty kooks in this NG????
Mike
got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all of
the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
JoeSpareBedroom
news:RvudncEPc-NLMEjR...@ptd.net...
> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in Congress
> got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all of
> the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
Nice writing, Uncle Jemima. You're shit-faced yet again.
LOL
Mike
racist, has proven that he can not comment on the Dims catastrophic losses
and once again must resort to a personal attack. And he wonders why we call
him Joe$#itForBrains. LOL
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:ioiBo.18398$3f.1...@newsfe12.iad...
edspyhill01
Nothing to talk about until we see what the lame duck sessions does,
if the Dems cave further. Then we wait for the new congress in
January, 2011.
As far as the election, what can I say. I've seen these election
results before. I find it absurd that people vote like little
children holding their breath until they die. Voting the repugnicans
back in is like a battered wife letting her violent husband back in to
the house for yet another "one more time"..
At least the most extreme tea potters lost, Joe Miller, Sharon Angle,
Christine O'Donnell, Meg Whitman, Carli Fiorino. That is solice
enough for me for now.
I'm on a short vacation in D.C. so I have limited time to access to
the NG.
Jane_Galt
> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in Congress
> got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all of
> the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
>
>
>
You want them back?
I've said for some time now, that I wish the Democratic Socialists would
become irrelevant, so the debate could become between the conservatives, with
whom I usually agree about 75% of the time, and the true NAP libertarians,
with whom I agree 100% of the time.
--
- Jane Galt
"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means
of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by
force, socialism - by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and
suicide." -- Ayn Rand, from "Foreign Policy Drains U.S. of Main Weapons"
Jane_Galt
Fool. Ron Paul won with 74% of the vote.
> I'm on a short vacation in D.C. so I have limited time to access to
> the NG.
Good for us.
pandora
> On Nov 6, 3:34 pm, "Mike" <mikehu...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in
>> Congress got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence
>> from all of the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
>
> Nothing to talk about until we see what the lame duck sessions does, if
> the Dems cave further. Then we wait for the new congress in January,
> 2011.
Indeed. I haven't heard word one from them about what they are
intending to do to *improve* things. All I've heard for 2 years is their
constant complaints.
> As far as the election, what can I say. I've seen these election
> results before. I find it absurd that people vote like little children
> holding their breath until they die. Voting the repugnicans back in is
> like a battered wife letting her violent husband back in to the house
> for yet another "one more time"..
Correct.
> At least the most extreme tea potters lost, Joe Miller, Sharon Angle,
> Christine O'Donnell, Meg Whitman, Carli Fiorino. That is solice enough
> for me for now.
And for me as well. Thank goodness for that!
> I'm on a short vacation in D.C. so I have limited time to access to the
> NG.
Have fun!
Mike
"edspyhill01" <edspy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d9b5ff3-047f-4904...@g25g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Mike
had been good to her, rather then the guy with whom she had a fling who only
used her to rob her friends, relatives, and her children and grand children.
LOL
"Jane_Galt" <Jane_...@gulch.xyz> wrote in message
news:Ht2dnfRw8dKfv0vR...@forethought.net...
Mike
been hurt over the past two years. It will take years to recover from the
damage inflicted by yet another Dimocrate who, like Jimmy Carter, is way in
over his head. A $13,000,000,000,000 national debt is fourty percent of
the GDP, and can not be sutained.
The nuts are currently running the asylem know as Washington DC. No other
President or Congress would have even considered allowing the fed to buy
$600,000,000 in US Bonds, that will devalue the dollar even more than the
15% it has already been devalued over the past two years.
Thank goodness enough of us Democrats has enough sense to vote for Reagan,
who instituted polices that returned the county to prosperity again.
Sadly, like back then, it will take twenty years to get the job done and
some other Dimocrate will get the credit as did Clinton. B.O.(ZO) did
one thing for the Dims however, he is making Carter look like a better
President in comparison. LOL
"pandora" <pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
news:ZJ-dndupeu2MrUvR...@scnresearch.com...
Mike
vote ;)
"Gary L. Burnore" <gbur...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:ib6b09$8vr$3...@nntpd.databasix.com...
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:50:26 -0500, "Jane_Galt" <Jane_...@gulch.xyz>
> wrote:
>
>>edspyhillus01 <edspy...@yahoo.com> wrote :
>>
>>> On Nov 6, 3:34 pm, "Mike" <mikehu...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in
>>>> Congres
>>> s
>>>> got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all
>>>> of
>>>> the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
>>>
>>> Nothing to talk about until we see what the lame duck sessions does,
>>> if the Dems cave further. Then we wait for the new congress in
>>> January, 2011.
>>>
>>> As far as the election, what can I say. I've seen these election
>>> results before. I find it absurd that people vote like little
>>> children holding their breath until they die. Voting the repugnicans
>>> back in is like a battered wife letting her violent husband back in to
>>> the house for yet another "one more time"..
>>>
>>> At least the most extreme tea potters lost, Joe Miller, Sharon Angle,
>>> Christine O'Donnell, Meg Whitman, Carli Fiorino. That is solice
>>> enough for me for now.
>>
>>Fool. Ron Paul won with 74% of the vote.
>
> Because Dems were too lazy to vote. Big deal.
> --
> gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How you look depends on where you go.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Burnore | нлГКнГоГКнГГнлКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| нлГКнГоГКнГГнлКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> | нлГКнГоГКнГГнлКнГоГКнГнГоГКнГннлГ
> You KNOW you want one: | нл 0 1 7 2 3 / нГо 3 7 4 9 3 0 лГ
> https://signup.databasix.com | Official Proof of Purchase
> ===========================================================================
Mike
talking stupid.
"dbu," <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:q_OdnW39uK2WiUrR...@giganews.com...
> In article <RvudncEPc-NLMEjR...@ptd.net>,
> Our NG gadfly twit is still killing off twelve pack after twelve pack
> and crushing the last can of each on his forehead, LOL.
>
> As for eddie, he is in denial, but I suspect will gather enough
> intestinal fortitude to return, LOL.
> --
>
JoeSpareBedroom
The medium is the message. This medium involves writing. Your message is "I
can't because I'm drunk."
Mike
again must resort to a personal attack. And he wonders why we call him
Joe$#itForBrains. LOL
"Joe$#itForBrains " <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:d2GBo.12568$Mk2...@newsfe13.iad...
Jeff Strickland
"JoeSpareBedroom" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:d2GBo.12568$Mk2...@newsfe13.iad...
>
>
> The medium is the message. This medium involves writing. Your message is
> "I can't because I'm drunk."
>
Ironically, you are one of the lefty kooks he is asking about.
JoeSpareBedroom
news:ib7gdp$bob$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I really don't give a damn about the theoretical content of his comments.
I'm just enjoying his illiteracy, regardless of the reason for it. He should
shut out the world until he solves that problem.
You believe in family values, right? Literacy is one of them.
edspyhill01
> In article <RvudncEPc-NLMEjRnZ2dnUVZ_j-dn...@ptd.net>,
> and crushing the last can of each on his forehead, LOL.
>
> As for eddie, he is in denial, but I suspect will gather enough
> intestinal fortitude to return, LOL.
> --
Still here but since being made redundant after my job was off-shored
I've been planning for the forced retirement. I'm not in denial.
Just don't have the time to argue about these things for the hundredth
time.
I almost hope the repugnicans and the tea potters drive the country
further into third world status. Just for the laughs.
JoeSpareBedroom
=============
http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entry/2266026
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/opinion/07kristof.html?src=me&ref=general
Jane_Galt
You're a lying ratbag then. It's the Progressives who want to reduce the
U.S. to the equivalent of north Korea.
"A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment
in North America and to de-develop the United States." - John Holdren,
President Obama's top science adviser.
“Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would
necessarily skyrocket.” – Barack Obama
"We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the
national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian
national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as
well-funded." -- Barack Obama
“You know, if you look at the victories and failures of the civil-rights
movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it
succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So
that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a
lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it, I’d be okay, but
the Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of
wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in
this society.
And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize
the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the
essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the
Constitution — at least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court
interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a
charter of negative liberties: [It] says what the states can’t do to you,
says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what
the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted, and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the
civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so
court-focused, uh, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the
political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are
able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring
about redistributive change. And in some ways we still suffer from that.” -
Barack Obama, 2001
"The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite political
philosophers: Mao Tse-tung and Mother Theresa -- not often coupled with
each other, but the two people I turn to most to basically deliver a simple
point which is 'you're going to make choices; you're going to challenge;
you're going to say why not; you're going to figure out how to do things
that have never been done before." - Anita Dunn, Obama White House
communications director.
"Any serious effort to reform the media system would have to be necessarily
part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself.
Also, there is no real answer, but to remove, brick by brick, the
capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist
principles." - Robert McChesney, Obama FCC diversity czar.
" A legislative effort to regulate broadcasting in the interest of
democratic principles should not be seen as an abridgment of the free
speech guarantee." - Obama Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein
Hachiroku ハチロク
Thanks for reminding me...
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in Congress
> got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all of
> the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
There have been only 1-2 lefty kooks here over the years, and only one
of them still posts, though infrequently.
OTOH the newsgroup still has plenty of right wing nuts who are wife
beaters, liars, alcoholics, chicken hawk tough guys, and religious
wackos (including an atheist), a 50-year-old virgin & murderer
wannabe, and someone who almost got a psycho discharge from the US
Navy over nuclear clearance issues.
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> Apparently the lefty kooks still do not understand how badly the county has
> been hurt over the past two years. It will take years to recover from the
> damage inflicted by yet another Dimocrate who, like Jimmy Carter, is way in
> over his head. A $13,000,000,000,000 national debt is fourty percent of
> the GDP, and can not be sutained.
The current situation is mostly the fault of incompetent GW Bush, who
didn't do anything right with economic policy after the 2001-2002
recession (a recession that wasn't his fault). The economy we have
now is what's to be expected when tax cuts and deregulation are
worshipped like dogma by a spendthrift.
If you do a proper search for the facts, you'll find that Jimmy Carter
inherited a terrible economic situation from Vietnam spending, Nixon's
wage-price controls, and the OPEC oil shock, and he actually did the
right thing with the economy, eventually, and set in place the cure
for inflation that was wrongly credited to Ronald Reagan.
Since when was a $13,000,000,000,000 national debt 40% of GDP? When
did we have a $32 trillion GDP? Our GDP peaked at roughly $15T. It
seems you're having problems with arithmetic again, as you did when
you said the atmospheric concentration of CO2 was about 100 times the
correct amount.
Mike
has attained that qualifies him to judge others in this NG, based on the
goofy posts submitted daily by Joe$#itForBrains
Perhaps others have noticed that he has yet to address the question ask in
my original post. One more indication of his, "change the subject"
defense. Yet he wonders why we call him Joe$#itForBrains LOL
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:3BHBo.6798$pp4....@newsfe03.iad...
JoeSpareBedroom
> One can only wonder what level of education has our friend
> Joe$#itForBrains has attained that qualifies him to judge others in this
> NG, based on the goofy posts submitted daily by Joe$#itForBrains
"As anyone beside my noticed"
hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
Mike
kooks. They still do not understand it is B.O.(ZO) and the Dims in
Congress that have started the county in that direction. LOL
"edspyhill01" <edspy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2d8ce49d-058e-4958...@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
C. E. White
>> Christine O'Donnell, Meg Whitman, Carli Fiorino. That is solice
>> enough for me for now.
>
> Fool. Ron Paul won with 74% of the vote.
Proves nothing. Pelosi won with 80% of the vote in her district. Both are
wacko I wish would loose.
This election was about unhappy people striking out in the only way they
could. If things aren't better in 2 years, a lot of these new Repulicans in
the House might be back out on the street (along with Obama). If things are
better, then they might all get another go round.
Ed
Mike
The lefty kooks will still continue to believe what they chose to believe.
If the major media had spent half as much time researching B.O.(ZO) as the
did the Republican VP, the voters would have know about his past and he
would not have been elected.
The problem for the county is he was elect and now we must deal with the
damage he as inflicted on the country.
"Jane_Galt" <Jane_...@gulch.xyz> wrote in message
news:lrOdndH8MvAS9UrR...@forethought.net...
Mike
an automobile NG? Could it be nobody will listen to your goofy stuff in
the political NGs?
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:4d3724e4-16e7-48ab...@z17g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
Mike
is today. During the 60,000,000 years the dinosaurs roamed the earth it
was 2.5% compared to less than one half of one percent today.
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:dcbaaf62-958f-4117...@i4g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Mike wrote:
>>
>> Apparently the lefty kooks still do not understand how badly the county
>> has
>> been hurt over the past two years. It will take years to recover from
>> the
>> damage inflicted by yet another Dimocrate who, like Jimmy Carter, is way
>> in
>> over his head. A $13,000,000,000,000 national debt is fourty percent of
>> the GDP, and can not be sutained.
>
edspyhill01
> edspyhill01 <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> wrote :
>
> - Show quoted text -
Arguing with an Ayn Rand disciple is like arguing with a born-again
christian or a muslim fundamentalist.
edspyhill01
wrote:
A rogues' gallery of the worst of the right wing here.
edspyhill01
> Perhaps, but the question remain WHY are all of you lefty kooks posting in
> an automobile NG? Could it be nobody will listen to your goofy stuff in
> the political NGs?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mike wrote:
>
> >> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in
> >> Congress
> >> got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all of
> >> the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
>
> > There have been only 1-2 lefty kooks here over the years, and only one
> > of them still posts, though infrequently.
>
> > OTOH the newsgroup still has plenty of right wing nuts who are wife
> > beaters, liars, alcoholics, chicken hawk tough guys, and religious
> > wackos (including an atheist), a 50-year-old virgin & murderer
> > wannabe, and someone who almost got a psycho discharge from the US
>
> - Show quoted text -
And all the rightwingnuts posting in an auto newsgroup? You stop
posting rightwing bullshit and the leftwingers will go away. It is as
simple as that.
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:dcbaaf62-958f-4117...@i4g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
> Apparently the lefty kooks still do not understand how badly the county
> has been hurt over the past two years. It will take years to recover from
> the damage inflicted by yet another Dimocrate who, like Jimmy Carter, is way
> in over his head. A $13,000,000,000,000 national debt is fourty percent of
> the GDP, and can not be sutained.
> > Since when was a $13,000,000,000,000 national debt 40% of GDP? When
> > did we have a $32 trillion GDP? Our GDP peaked at roughly $15T. It
> > seems you're having problems with arithmetic again, as you did when
> > you said the atmospheric concentration of CO2 was about 100 times the
> > correct amount.
> What I said was the historical record proves the CO2 level was 5Xs what it
> is today. During the 60,000,000 years the dinosaurs roamed the earth it
> was 2.5% compared to less than one half of one percent today.
That's an absolute lie, Mike. You were referring to the current CO2
level, and you got your % and PPMs mixed up. If that wasn't the case,
why did you RETRACT your number and admit that the CO2 concentration I
or someone else was correct?
And you've completely glossed over your estimate of the US GDP being
$32 trillion (if $13 trillion is 40% of GDP). Is that going to be
another mistake you'll deny and lie about, Mr. Alcohol For Brains?
Mike
the ones who came into this automobile NG and started posting all of their
goofy stuff. Those already in this NG simply have been pointed out how
kooky you lefties have been.
They tried it in other auto NGs as well but that did not work.
"edspyhill01" <edspy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f30afa96-cb09-472f...@x4g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:4d3724e4-16e7-48ab...@z17g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
> As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in
> Congress got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from all of
> the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
>
> > There have been only 1-2 lefty kooks here over the years, and only one
> > of them still posts, though infrequently.
> >
> > OTOH the newsgroup still has plenty of right wing nuts who are wife
> > beaters, liars, alcoholics, chicken hawk tough guys, and religious
> > wackos (including an atheist), a 50-year-old virgin & murderer
> > wannabe, and someone who almost got a psycho discharge from the US
> > Navy over nuclear clearance issues.
> Perhaps, but the question remain WHY are all of you lefty kooks posting in
> an automobile NG? Could it be nobody will listen to your goofy stuff in
> the political NGs?
Why are you right-wing kooks posting so much here? The very first
political posts I saw in this newsgroup were from psycho military
discharge himself.
I'm not a lefty (I didn't even vote for Bill Clinton but instead for
Bob Dole), and you're not in a position of authority to call anyone
else a kook, consider your wild, drunken pronouncements. I'm in
three political news groups under a different name, none which are
part of Usenet, all are heavily and fairly moderated for facts and
faulty logic, so naturally few people like you last long there.
Mike
JURASSIC ERA GINKO PLANTS INDICATE MORE CO2 IN PAST.
In past geologic ages carbon dioxide levels were four to five times higher
than they are today. All the nice carbon products that heat our homes and
make our cars go down the road were made from CO2 by plants using an in put
of UV light. Most of the incoming light obviously didn't come from our sun
because it doesn't have enough power to keep us out of Ice Ages.
A recent TV documentary alludes to how much CO2 was in our atmosphere
during the Jurassic era. The flow of CO2 into ancient oceans (probably
belched up from undersea volcanoes) created much of the oil bearing shale's
that we are taping today with horizontal drilling.
Today's ginko plants are almost identical to those growing 65 to 100-million
years ago except for one thing. All plants need carbon dioxide to grow
because that is where the carbon comes from for carbon based life forms. By
counting the number of stomata on fossilized ginko leaves and comparing them
with ginko plants growing today scientists estimate that during the
Cretaceous and Jurassic periods Co2 levels were 4 to 5 times higher than
they are today.
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:922a496a-0b86-4a4c...@a9g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Mike wrote:
>>
>> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>> news:dcbaaf62-958f-4117...@i4g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> What I said was the historical record proves the CO2 level was 5Xs what
Mike
engineers and techs exchanged ideas, and long before the cheapskates jumped
in to look for free information on how to fix their old worn out cars and
the lefty kooks started spewing their garbage about GWB, particular in this
NG.
Just for the record, regardless of what our friend Joe$#itForBrains would
have others believe, I do not drink or ever done drugs.
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:2142505f-36b9-48cf...@x4g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Mike wrote:
>>
>> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>> news:4d3724e4-16e7-48ab...@z17g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
JoeSpareBedroom
>
> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:2142505f-36b9-48cf...@x4g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>> Mike wrote:
>>>
>>> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4d3724e4-16e7-48ab...@z17g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
>> Why are you right-wing kooks posting so much here? The very first
>> political posts I saw in this newsgroup were from psycho military
>> discharge himself.
>>
>> I'm not a lefty (I didn't even vote for Bill Clinton but instead for
>> Bob Dole), and you're not in a position of authority to call anyone
>> else a kook, consider your wild, drunken pronouncements. I'm in
>> three political news groups under a different name, none which are
>> part of Usenet, all are heavily and fairly moderated for facts and
>> faulty logic, so naturally few people like you last long there.
>
>
>I have been posting the auto NGs ever since they were a place where
>engineers and techs exchanged ideas, and long before the cheapskates jumped
>in to look for free information on how to fix their old worn out cars and
>the lefty kooks started spewing their garbage about GWB, particular in this
>NG.
>
> Just for the record, regardless of what our friend Joe$#itForBrains would
> have others believe, I do not drink or ever done drugs.
>
>
>
So, you're just naturally illiterate without any help from booze? And you
claim to have an engineering degree? What college allowed you to graduate
while illiterate?
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> Just for the record, regardless of what our friend Joe$#itForBrains would
> have others believe, I do not drink or ever done drugs.
I'm going by what you said about your drinking, by your gross
misstatements of fact ($13T national debt is 40% of GDP), and by your
drunk typing (which you've blamed on a spelling checker problems).
At what age did you stop drinking? You've provided various
scenarios:
1) You never drank;
2) You drank only beer but quit once you left college;
3) You drank the wine you brought into at least one Philadelphia
restaurant.
You also said you liked to "imbibe" fine single-malt scotch.
larry moe 'n curly
I left out our flakey convicted con man. My apologies to Hachi.
I recently found a place where veterans of our nuclear weapons forces
hold discussions, MissileForums.com, and they sure seem different than
Scott Nuke 'em All -- very serious about nukes and very reluctant to
use them.
edspyhill01
--
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for
insight and understanding." Marshall McLuhan
"Mike" <mike...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:2YCdnYqhH8xGp0XR...@ptd.net...
> As we would expect you have it backwards. It was the lefty kooks who
> were the ones who came into this automobile NG and started posting all of
> their goofy stuff. Those already in this NG simply have been pointed out
> how kooky you lefties have been.
>
> They tried it in other auto NGs as well but that did not work.
>
>
I doubt that. This NG is one of the worst out there. You stop posting the
rightwing crap and the leftwing replies will stop.
Mike
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3d2b3b26-f1a7-459d...@w38g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:3d2b3b26-f1a7-459d...@w38g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>
> Just for the record, regardless of what our friend Joe$#itForBrains would
> have others believe, I do not drink or ever done drugs.
>
> > I'm going by what you said about your drinking, by your gross
> > misstatements of fact ($13T national debt is 40% of GDP), and by your
> > drunk typing (which you've blamed on a spelling checker problems).
> >
> > At what age did you stop drinking? You've provided various scenarios:
> >
> > 1) You never drank;
> > 2) You drank only beer but quit once you left college;
> > 3) You drank the wine you brought into at least one Philadelphia restaurant.
> >
> > You also said you liked to "imbibe" fine single-malt scotch.
>
> In your imagination, perhaps. LOL
No, in the messages you posted in this forum, over several years.
You've admitted to drinking wine, scotch, and, more recently, beer,
but you've also denied drinking wine, scotch, and beer.
JoeSpareBedroom
Typical denial pattern of an alcoholic, along with laughing out loud at
things which absolutely are not funny.
Jane_Galt
> You went to a lot of trouble to find those quotes, but it will do not
> good. The lefty kooks will still continue to believe what they chose to
> believe.
>
> If the major media had spent half as much time researching B.O.(ZO) as
> the did the Republican VP, the voters would have know about his past and
> he would not have been elected.
>
> The problem for the county is he was elect and now we must deal with the
> damage he as inflicted on the country.
>
The lefties are coming out of the closet now. A MSNBC guy ( I quit watching
them years ago because of this ) openly says he's a socialist now, and proud
of it
Mike
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:b3270490-0e07-4786...@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Mike
That's why we call you Joe$#itForBrains LOL
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:RG0Co.8940$pp4....@newsfe03.iad...
Charles Grozny
"Mike" <mike...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:jKWdnTgHkIEV7UTR...@ptd.net...
Joe is always comical in a sad sort of way. It's amazing that they let
tuckus-leckers like him out into the general population.
Charles Grozny
larry moe 'n curly
Charles Grozny wrote:
>
> Joe is always comical in a sad sort of way. It's amazing that they let
> tuckus-leckers like him out into the general population.
And you, woman hater Charles Fregeau, wanted to commit murder in Jan.,
2009, by shooting an automatic rifle into the crowd at the
presidential inauguration. You are so loathesome that you have have
no right to pass judgement against anybody, not even the devil.
larry moe 'n curly
Mike wrote:
>
> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:b3270490-0e07-4786...@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>
> Just for the record, regardless of what our friend Joe$#itForBrains would
> have others believe, I do not drink or ever done drugs.
>
> > I'm going by what you said about your drinking, by your gross
> > misstatements of fact ($13T national debt is 40% of GDP), and by your
> > drunk typing (which you've blamed on a spelling checker problems).
> >
> > At what age did you stop drinking? You've provided various scenarios:
> >
> > 1) You never drank;
> > 2) You drank only beer but quit once you left college;
> > 3) You drank the wine you brought into at least one Philadelphia restaurant.
> >
> > You also said you liked to "imbibe" fine single-malt scotch.
>
> In your imagination, perhaps. LOL
>
> > No, in the messages you posted in this forum, over several years.
> > You've admitted to drinking wine, scotch, and, more recently, beer,
> > but you've also denied drinking wine, scotch, and beer.
>
> You must be drunk if that is what you choose to believe LOL
If I were drunk, I'd forget those points. You're again lying like a
car salesman, you goddamn wife beater.
JoeSpareBedroom
news:dMmdnQE1sN29ekTR...@giganews.com...
> In article <uATBo.12703$Mk2....@newsfe13.iad>,>> news:9L2dndgCreSFmEXR...@ptd.net...
>> > One can only wonder what level of education has our friend
>> > Joe$#itForBrains has attained that qualifies him to judge others in
>> > this
>> > NG, based on the goofy posts submitted daily by Joe$#itForBrains
>>
>>
>> "As anyone beside my noticed"
>>
>> hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Twit you gotta be the funny guy, Milton Berle type, LOL. He was funny,
> like you twit.
> --
>
Your definition of "gadfly": Someone who passed high school English.
Charles Grozny
"dbu," <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:dMmdnQQ1sN07eETR...@giganews.com...
> In article
> <16e5f2eb-478d-452b...@n24g2000prj.googlegroups.com>,
> edspyhill01 <edspy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 7, 10:03 pm, "Jane_Galt" <Jane__G...@gulch.xyz> wrote:
>> > edspyhill01 <edspyhil...@yahoo.com> wrote :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Nov 7, 3:03 pm, "dbu," <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > >> In article <RvudncEPc-NLMEjRnZ2dnUVZ_j-dn...@ptd.net>,
>> >
>> > >> "Mike" <mikehu...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> > >> > As anyone beside my noticed, that since B.O.(ZO,) and the Dims in
>> > Congr
>> > > ess
>> > >> > got their asses handed to them last Tuesday, that the silence from
>> > >> > all
>> > > of
>> > >> > the lefty kooks in the NG has been deafening? LOL
>> >
>> > >> Our NG gadfly twit is still killing off twelve pack after twelve
>> > >> pack
>> > >> and crushing the last can of each on his forehead, LOL.
>> >
>> > >> As for eddie, he is in denial, but I suspect will gather enough
>> > >> intestinal fortitude to return, LOL.
>> > >> --
>> >
>> > > Still here but since being made redundant after my job was off-shored
>> > > I've been planning for the forced retirement. I'm not in denial.
>> > > Just don't have the time to argue about these things for the
>> > > hundredth
>> > > time.
>> >
>> > > I almost hope the repugnicans and the tea potters drive the country
>> > > further into third world status. Just for the laughs.
>> >
>> > You're a lying ratbag then. It's the Progressives who want to reduce
>> > the
>> > U.S. to the equivalent of north Korea.
>> >
>> > "A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality
>> > environment
>> > in North America and to de-develop the United States." - John Holdren,
>> > President Obama's top science adviser.
>> >
>> > łUnder my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would
>> > necessarily skyrocket.˛ Barack Obama
>> >
>> > "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the
>> > national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian
>> > national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just
>> > as
>> > well-funded." -- Barack Obama
>> >
>> > łYou know, if you look at the victories and failures of the
>> > civil-rights
>> > movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it
>> > succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples.
>> > So
>> > that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at
>> > a
>> > lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it, Iąd be okay,
>> > but
>> > the Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of
>> > wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice
>> > in
>> > this society.
>> > And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to
>> > characterize
>> > the Warren Court, it wasnąt that radical. It didnąt break free from the
>> > essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the
>> > Constitution < at least as itąs been interpreted, and Warren Court
>> > interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a
>> > charter of negative liberties: [It] says what the states canąt do to
>> > you,
>> > says what the federal government canąt do to you, but it doesnąt say
>> > what
>> > the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.
>> > And that hasnąt shifted, and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the
>> > civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so
>> > court-focused, uh, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of
>> > the
>> > political and community organizing and activities on the ground that
>> > are
>> > able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you
>> > bring
>> > about redistributive change. And in some ways we still suffer from
>> > that.˛ -
>> > Barack Obama, 2001
>> >
>> > "The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite
>> > political
>> > philosophers: Mao Tse-tung and Mother Theresa -- not often coupled with
>> > each other, but the two people I turn to most to basically deliver a
>> > simple
>> > point which is 'you're going to make choices; you're going to
>> > challenge;
>> > you're going to say why not; you're going to figure out how to do
>> > things
>> > that have never been done before." - Anita Dunn, Obama White House
>> > communications director.
>> >
>> > "Any serious effort to reform the media system would have to be
>> > necessarily
>> > part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system
>> > itself.
>> > Also, there is no real answer, but to remove, brick by brick, the
>> > capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist
>> > principles." - Robert McChesney, Obama FCC diversity czar.
>> >
>> > " A legislative effort to regulate broadcasting in the interest of
>> > democratic principles should not be seen as an abridgment of the free
>> > speech guarantee." - Obama Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein
>> >
>> > --
>> > - Jane Galt
>> >
>> > "There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the
>> > means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave
>> > men
>> > by force, socialism - by vote. It is merely the difference between
>> > murder
>> > and suicide." -- Ayn Rand, from "Foreign Policy Drains U.S. of Main
>> > Weapons"- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Arguing with an Ayn Rand disciple is like arguing with a born-again
>> christian or a muslim fundamentalist.
>
> That is in your humble opinion, right eddie?
> --
>
Eddie should go back to fishing in his swimming pool in his robe.
Charles Grozny
edspyhill01
> "dbu," <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:dMmdnQQ1sN07eETR...@giganews.com...
>
>
>
> > In article
> >> > necessarily skyrocket. Barack Obama
>
> >> > "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the
> >> > national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian
> >> > national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just
> >> > as
> >> > well-funded." -- Barack Obama
>
> >> > civil-rights
> >> > movement, and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it
> >> > succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples.
> >> > So
> >> > that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at
> >> > a
> >> > but
> >> > the Supreme Court never entered into the issues of redistribution of
> >> > wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice
> >> > in
> >> > this society.
> >> > And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to
> >> > characterize
> >> > essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the
> >> > interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a
> >> > you,
> >> > says what the federal government can t do to you, but it doesn t say
> >> > what
> >> > the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.
I heard you put on a plastic crown of thorns and fake stigmata and
beatoff surrounded by religious pictures.
Jane_Galt
> In article <54udnQhxnaJaVkXR...@forethought.net>,
> "Jane_Galt" <Jane_...@gulch.xyz> wrote:
>
>> "Mike" <mike...@lycos.com> wrote :
>>
>> > You went to a lot of trouble to find those quotes, but it will do not
>> > good. The lefty kooks will still continue to believe what they chose
>> > to believe.
>> >
>> > If the major media had spent half as much time researching B.O.(ZO)
>> > as the did the Republican VP, the voters would have know about his
>> > past and he would not have been elected.
>> >
>> > The problem for the county is he was elect and now we must deal with
>> > the damage he as inflicted on the country.
>> >
>>
>> The lefties are coming out of the closet now. A MSNBC guy ( I quit
>> watching them years ago because of this ) openly says he's a socialist
>> now, and proud of it
>
> And father christ matewes said upon the obama's christening, I feel a
> tingle crawling up my leg, or something, LOL.
Kinda gay?
Mike
"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymo...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:09e5b4f7-035f-49fb...@w30g2000prj.googlegroups.com...
Charles Grozny
"Mike" <mike...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:-NadnXXvZYDkNkfR...@ptd.net...
> You must be drunk if that is what you choose to believe LOL
>
>
Whiney Joe Besser can't think logically anyway. You wouldn't be anywhere
near where you are now if you were a drunken wife beater. That's usually
the problem with libturds anyway. Their logic makes no sense in the REAL
universe. Before you ask, the color in Whiney Joe Besser's sky is red with
a little yellow hammer, sickle and star.
You can't accumulate wealth and keep a sucessful business running if you are
a drunken sot, and throwing it away faster than you earn it. You don't have
the energy to keep ahead of the game. I've seen enough of them. I used to
live in Helena AR where we sold twice as much beer as they did over in
Stuttgart, Arkansas which was mostly German. (Though they do insist on
pronouncing it Stuckerd) Helena now has drive-by shootings just like the
big city of Chicago.
You also can't get people to respect you at work if you don't respect them.
If you don't respect your wife who is VERY close to you, how can I expect
you to respect anybody who works for you?
Charles Grozny