Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Paramedics Fired Over Ku Klux Klan Photos

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

DanielSan

unread,
Jul 14, 2008, 10:55:14 PM7/14/08
to
J wrote:
> This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far. This sounds like
> nothing more than a couple of college kids having a few laughs. Poor taste?
> definitely, but not worth firing the students over.
>

Sorry, but that's not the reason they were fired.

--
******************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* "I distrust those people who know so well what God *
* wants them to do because I notice it always *
* coincides with their own desires." *
* --Susan B. Anthony *
******************************************************

Stan-O

unread,
Jul 14, 2008, 11:00:19 PM7/14/08
to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:38:59 -0400, "J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:

>This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far. This sounds like
>nothing more than a couple of college kids having a few laughs. Poor taste?
>definitely, but not worth firing the students over.


Someone should fuck you in the ear to give you some brains...

Ray Fischer

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 2:13:27 AM7/15/08
to
J <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far.

Then stop posting your nazi PC bullshit.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

ath...@home.com

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 2:22:58 AM7/15/08
to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:55:14 -0700, DanielSan
<dani...@speakeasy.net> wrote:

>J wrote:
>> This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far. This sounds like
>> nothing more than a couple of college kids having a few laughs. Poor taste?
>> definitely, but not worth firing the students over.
>>
>
>Sorry, but that's not the reason they were fired.

Why were they fired?

atheist@home#1554

DanielSan

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 8:33:04 AM7/15/08
to

Not for "having a few laughs". Not for it being in "poor taste".

One person was shown wearing a uniform for the EMS of University
Hospital. Every job I've been in says that you are NOT ALLOWED to do
things that disparage the company you work for...as a representative of
that company.

If I were, as a representative of the company I work for, disparage my
company, I'd be out on my ear. It's in the contract I signed when I
started working there.

I'm surprised that you even had to ask that question.

Mark K. Bilbo

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 8:15:42 AM7/15/08
to
J wrote:
> This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far. This sounds like
> nothing more than a couple of college kids having a few laughs. Poor taste?
> definitely, but not worth firing the students over.


Jerk Young: pro-slavery, pro-KKK, pro-Nazi.

And yet talks about "decency" all the time...

ath...@home.com

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 10:37:54 AM7/15/08
to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:33:04 -0700, DanielSan
<dani...@speakeasy.net> wrote:

>ath...@home.com wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:55:14 -0700, DanielSan
>> <dani...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> J wrote:
>>>> This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far. This sounds like
>>>> nothing more than a couple of college kids having a few laughs. Poor taste?
>>>> definitely, but not worth firing the students over.
>>>>
>>> Sorry, but that's not the reason they were fired.
>>
>> Why were they fired?
>
>Not for "having a few laughs". Not for it being in "poor taste".
>
>One person was shown wearing a uniform for the EMS of University
>Hospital. Every job I've been in says that you are NOT ALLOWED to do
>things that disparage the company you work for...as a representative of
>that company.
>
>If I were, as a representative of the company I work for, disparage my
>company, I'd be out on my ear. It's in the contract I signed when I
>started working there.
>
>I'm surprised that you even had to ask that question.

Why?
I didn't see anything that I feel they should have lost their jobs
over.

atheist@home#1554

Douglas Berry

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 12:03:43 PM7/15/08
to
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:38:59 -0400 "J" <Jvis...@live.com> carved the
following into the hard stone of alt.atheism

>This 'politically correct' bullshit is going too far. This sounds like
>nothing more than a couple of college kids having a few laughs. Poor taste?
>definitely, but not worth firing the students over.

The KKK is a terrorist organization.

Do you support the terrorists, IBen?
--

Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 12:00:51 PM7/15/08
to

You know, as in "decent white folk".


-- cary

Mike Painter

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 8:36:33 PM7/15/08
to
If it's a "condition of employment" they need no other reason.
PG&E always puts cones out around their vehicles. Apparently it saves a lot
of accidents.
It is a condition of employment and if you don't do it and get caught you
are fired without recourse.

Another example of "condition of employment" is found in teh Roman Catholic
Priesthood where they take a vow of poverty, chastity, and obedience.
If they------- What? Really?
And they aren't fired?

Never mind.


DanielSan

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 9:09:14 PM7/15/08
to
Message has been deleted

Billzz

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 10:11:44 PM7/15/08
to
"Bob Officer" <bobof...@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
news:e8lq74h6anbrvlbsc...@4ax.com...
> The KKK is a Terrorist and White Supremacist Organization, or didn't
> you understand you can't joke about terrorist and criminal behavior.

I think Steve Allen wrote the book on what is comedy, satire, spoof, parady,
and other genre of taking a serious subject and making fun. A good example
(and he is always a good example) is Mel Brooks who could even (in "The
Producers") make an entire musical sequence called "Springtime for Hitler,"
and not only get away with it, but there was absolutely no question that it
was *not* serious, it was comedy.

So if the people in question ( I did not look very long at the pic) did not
break into song and dance, but treated it seriously, then it is not comedy,
or satire, or parady, and they can be taken seriously, and fired. And sued,
for that matter.

One of the defenses against copyright violation, or libel, or slander, is
that the performance was *NOT* serious, it was parady.

So the bottom line is the question, "What was in their intent?" Was it
comedy? If so, walk. If not, face the results.


>
> --
> John D. aka Stupid Wentzky in
> <XisNj.23413$Q52....@bignews9.bellsouth.net>
> stated WRT the sex offenders register in South Carolina
> "Some idiot in the pinko commie tax leech business group, at the expense
> of
> the people, tried to get me to register on that unconsstitutional bullshit
> list"
> and in Message <ZsuNj.2183$tG6...@bignews1.bellsouth.net>
> Stupid wrote:
> "By telling that fool that i was NOT reuqired to register.
> It is written in plain english,"


ath...@home.com

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 10:23:43 PM7/15/08
to

I just have a tendency to think firing should be an absolute last
resort regarding most offenses.

>Another example of "condition of employment" is found in teh Roman Catholic
>Priesthood where they take a vow of poverty, chastity, and obedience.
>If they------- What? Really?
>And they aren't fired?
>
>Never mind.

Heh :)

atheist@home#1554

ath...@home.com

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 11:09:44 PM7/15/08
to
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:09:14 -0700, DanielSan
<dani...@speakeasy.net> wrote:

Christian monks in white robes?
I wouldn't judge the intent by the photo.
However the cones on the heads do appear to be suspicious.
Still, I wouldn't just assume it is what it appears to be.
But these are EMS people and if an investigation concluded that the
intent was racist I would have to agree that because of their
positions as public servants no second chances are justifiable.
Makes me think me though.
I once took the body of a beautiful little four year old black girl to
the E.R.
She didn't stand a chance because the white pediatrician at the office
where we picked her up, while doing chest compressions, refused to do
mouth to mouth.
The mother rode to the hosital in the ambulance with us and I'll never
forget the horrible and indescribable scream when they told her that
her only child, the love of her life and everything she lived for was
dead.
That was around 1975 and I have tortured and murdered the sorry
bastard a thousand times since in my dreams.
But in all honesty, in 18 years of emergency services I have never
worked with or around anyone other than him who has let his racist
views affect his care of a patient.
And I was always very impressed by that.

atheist@home#1554

DanielSan

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 11:30:26 PM7/15/08
to

Um, no.

> I wouldn't judge the intent by the photo.

It was intended as hazing.

> However the cones on the heads do appear to be suspicious.
> Still, I wouldn't just assume it is what it appears to be.
> But these are EMS people and if an investigation concluded that the
> intent was racist I would have to agree that because of their
> positions as public servants no second chances are justifiable.

*nod*

That's all I'm saying.

Billzz

unread,
Jul 15, 2008, 11:45:40 PM7/15/08
to
<ath...@home.com> wrote in message
news:8qmq7450k0pkjaqur...@4ax.com...

In the defense industry (amongst others, but that is what I know) people
expect to be fired for no reason other than the company did not get the
contract renewed. When President Reagan appeared on TV, at the end of the
cold war, we knew full well that SDI was underfunded, would never be funded,
and it was to cause the USSR to quit, which they did, and the next day,
there was the president in front of a bunch of programs on a board with a
red x through them. The next day, over 600 people were fired from Rockwell
in San Bernadino, CA, and some 130,000 people were fired, just in
California, overall.

In some industries, firing is not the last resort, it is the first resort.

Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)

unread,
Jul 16, 2008, 12:00:43 AM7/16/08
to
On Jul 16, 12:23 pm, athe...@home.com wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:36:33 -0700, "Mike Painter"
>
>
>
> <mddotpain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> >athe...@home.com wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:33:04 -0700, DanielSan
> >> <daniel...@speakeasy.net> wrote:

It does depend on contract. But generally uniforms or company IDs
should get involved in even remotely spurious events. I know that for
where I work, there's to be no IDs or uniforms worn so much as down to
the pub. Even for a work function. You just don't do it. And
without the threat, and without carrying through on the threat, it has
no weight as a rule. It just becomes a vague guideline.

> >Another example of "condition of employment" is found in teh Roman Catholic
> >Priesthood where they take a vow of poverty, chastity, and obedience.
> >If they------- What? Really?
> >And they aren't fired?
>
> >Never mind.
>
> Heh :)
>

They must have a good union, and crappy contracts.

Al

Message has been deleted
0 new messages