Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Understanding duke

80 views
Skip to first unread message

Kit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 11:01:17 AM5/3/17
to
After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.

For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.

Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq. He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).

Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing. His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.

I the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism and right-wing Republicanism.

raven1

unread,
May 3, 2017, 11:26:19 AM5/3/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
wrote:

>After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>
>For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
>
>Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq. He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).

There's also another reason...

>Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing. His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>
>I the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism and right-wing Republicanism.

It should be noted that in addition to his mental deficiencies, Duke
is wildly racist. That's why his Republicanism inevitably trumps his
Catholicism.

Cloud Hobbit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 11:44:30 AM5/3/17
to
If you are claiming a link between the GOP and racism, you have some work to do. Being against the various kinds of welfare that were created primarily to help persons of color does not mean racism. The 2 times they used the southern strategy do mean racism. They mean stupidity in the latter case not racism.

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
May 3, 2017, 12:08:45 PM5/3/17
to
On Wed, 03 May 2017 11:26:15 -0400, raven1
<quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
>wrote:
>
>>After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>>
>>For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
>>
>>Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly
>>compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W.
>>Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq. He simply concludes Obama was
>>the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he
>>often derisively refers to as 'rats).

As Presidents go, he was one of the better ones.

But neither like most Democrats, he is too far removed from its
grassroots supporters even though he improved healthcare - which other
conservative-run countries take for granted.

And like other Democrat residents, he is to the right of every
Conservative Party prime minister in Britain during my lifetime, prior
to Margaret Thatcher.

I disprove his use of drones for targeted assassinations in
Afghanistan, Syria, etc,

IMO, it's both a coward's weapon and indiscriminate.

But Puke hates Obama because he is black, liberal, intelligent and
highly educated.

>There's also another reason...
>
>>Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by
>>the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of
>>illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.

Even though, for example, the Californian agricultural industry relies
on them to do work that Americans wouldn't do. As well as poorly paid
jobs in the food, construction and other industries.

>>His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these
>>aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested
>>in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.

It's also made him so stupid that he imagines its doctrines apply to
everybody and takes no notice when the people he harasses and
harangues aren't even Christian.

Nobody is entitled to a POV that is different to his.

>>I the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging
>>duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend
>>ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism and right-wing
>>Republicanism.

Which are symptoms of a wider problem - he's a malignant narcissist,
bandit is impossible to engage with them.

>It should be noted that in addition to his mental deficiencies, Duke
>is wildly racist. That's why his Republicanism inevitably trumps his
>Catholicism.

He's also ignorant and stupid but imagines he is more knowledgeable
and more intelligent than the educated, knowledgeable and intelligent.

Witness his response to my mention of the Casimir effect which
provided experimental verification of particles appearing ex-nihilo in
a vacuum.

Kit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 12:34:47 PM5/3/17
to
I would concur with Cloud Hobbit, raven1. Duke shows no animosity towards black Republicans such as Ben Carson or Clarence Thomas. It is all too convenient and irresponsible to label him as a racist.

Kit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 12:37:04 PM5/3/17
to
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 12:08:45 PM UTC-4, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2017 11:26:15 -0400, raven1
> <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
> >>
> >>For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
> >>
> >>Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly
> >>compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W.
> >>Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq. He simply concludes Obama was
> >>the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he
> >>often derisively refers to as 'rats).
>
> As Presidents go, he was one of the better ones.
>
> But neither like most Democrats, he is too far removed from its
> grassroots supporters even though he improved healthcare - which other
> conservative-run countries take for granted.
>
> And like other Democrat residents, he is to the right of every
> Conservative Party prime minister in Britain during my lifetime, prior
> to Margaret Thatcher.
>
> I disprove his use of drones for targeted assassinations in
> Afghanistan, Syria, etc,
>

I concur wholeheartedly.

> IMO, it's both a coward's weapon and indiscriminate.
>
> But Puke hates Obama because he is black, liberal, intelligent and
> highly educated.
>
> >There's also another reason...
> >
> >>Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by
> >>the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of
> >>illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.
>
> Even though, for example, the Californian agricultural industry relies
> on them to do work that Americans wouldn't do. As well as poorly paid
> jobs in the food, construction and other industries.
>
> >>His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these
> >>aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested
> >>in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>
> It's also made him so stupid that he imagines its doctrines apply to
> everybody and takes no notice when the people he harasses and
> harangues aren't even Christian.
>
> Nobody is entitled to a POV that is different to his.
>

Yeah. It must be hard being duke.

raven1

unread,
May 3, 2017, 1:00:58 PM5/3/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 09:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
Go back and re-read almost anything Duke has had to say about
President Obama, and tell me he's not racist.

Kit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 1:05:09 PM5/3/17
to
There is a high correlation between being black and holding liberal Democrat views. Duke displays no animosity towards blacks who are politically conservative. Hence, I would not call him racist.

Jefferson Was An Impious Slave Molester

unread,
May 3, 2017, 2:35:22 PM5/3/17
to
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 11:01:17 AM UTC-4, Kit wrote:
> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>
>For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican.



Probably because JFK was Catholic too.... :-)

default

unread,
May 3, 2017, 5:05:32 PM5/3/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
wrote:

I think you are right and I notice he's become demonstrably worse in
the last year. There was a time when he actually put some effort into
his posts, now he's just trying to keep a presence in many threads and
offering no substance in any of them. Hit and move on...

Earning his place in the bozo bin...

I'd say he isn't a Republican not in the sense of the corporate and
wealthy political interests, he's just wallowing with the mindless
fringe ninnies who've usurped the Republican party.

Cloud Hobbit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 8:07:17 PM5/3/17
to
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:01:17 AM UTC-7, Kit wrote:
> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>
> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.

Compared to today's Democrats JFK was a lot closer to the Republicans of today than the Democrats of today. JFK is quoted as saying he would have voted for Nixon if he himself had not won the nomination because he did not think any of the other democrats were tough enough on communism.

>
> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq.

I think they did less harm to the country than Obama's policies did.

He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).

I don't think he was the worst ever, that would be FDR whose policies hurt the country forever after. At least the ones that the SCOTUS did not rule unconstitutional before he scared the shit out of them by wanting to add more justices.

>
> Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.

It is.

His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>
> In the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism and right-wing Republicanism.

As a Libertarian, I can not find it to be wise to vote for either of the two main political parties.

Cloud Hobbit

unread,
May 3, 2017, 8:15:30 PM5/3/17
to
I was speaking of the way the left demonizes the GOP, not that duke is not racist. I think he only talks about certain persons of color in a favorable light when they support one of his absurd ideas. He tries to say that it is not stupid to be a theist by claiming that brilliant people like Ben Carson are also theists. He doesn't seem to get the idea that one can be fully functional in other ways but still be irrational by being a theist

Duke shows no animosity towards black Republicans such as Ben Carson or Clarence Thomas. It is all too convenient and irresponsible to label him as a racist.

At the moment I can't recall him saying anything against persons of color in particular only that he has praised a few. If I had to guess I'd be inclined to think he is somewhat racist even if he doesn't go to Klan meetings.

bil...@m.nu

unread,
May 3, 2017, 8:37:18 PM5/3/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
wrote:

He is a theist, so therefore by default he is also retarded

raven1

unread,
May 3, 2017, 11:23:57 PM5/3/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 10:05:04 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
So the actual racist language he constantly used in referring to Obama
over periods of years can be dismissed as political differences? I
don't think so.

Olrik

unread,
May 3, 2017, 11:59:07 PM5/3/17
to
For years the "duke" thing called Obama "buckwheat"...


--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

bil...@m.nu

unread,
May 4, 2017, 1:13:04 AM5/4/17
to
On Wed, 03 May 2017 11:26:15 -0400, raven1
<quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:

well when a person is considering duke for whatever reasons you must
first place him into respective.
There are things that some would say is pure evil.. jim jones, charles
manson..
These things are bad, and you can say evil , and surely they were
these things <profoundly immoral and malevolent. as defined at google>
Now even though duke could be described as immoral and even malevolent
that is not where I am going.
used as an analogy you must equate evil with stupidity. This is the
role that duke fills. His stupidity will match the evil of ted bundy
any day....

Now that being said, not to mention that all of this has been
discussed before <several times> for what reasons would the "Hoff"
order his car to rehash someone as fucking stupid as duke?

PeteFJ

unread,
May 4, 2017, 3:02:14 AM5/4/17
to
I'm sure you're right. But in his defense he does provide a certain
degree of humour. His extreme right wing defense of the Catholic Church
and his love of the Republican Party do provide a welcome degree of
humour that this NG sometimes lacks.

But if you can't take him any longer then kill file him. He'll like it
in the warm and cozy dark of the bozo bin.

PFJ

duke

unread,
May 4, 2017, 2:48:28 PM5/4/17
to
On Wed, 03 May 2017 11:26:15 -0400, raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com> wrote:

Aw, gosh. Wrong on all counts.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

duke

unread,
May 4, 2017, 4:01:15 PM5/4/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:07:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit <youngbl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:01:17 AM UTC-7, Kit wrote:
>> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>>
>> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
>
>Compared to today's Democrats JFK was a lot closer to the Republicans of today than the Democrats of today. JFK is quoted as saying he would have voted for Nixon if he himself had not won the nomination because he did not think any of the other democrats were tough enough on communism.

Well, well, well. And what have I been saying but exactly that.

>> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq.

>I think they did less harm to the country than Obama's policies did.
> He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).

What the heck. 'rats are now saying the same thing. Even they are coming to
realize how bad 'ratbama was.

>I don't think he was the worst ever, that would be FDR whose policies hurt the country forever after. At least the ones that the SCOTUS did not rule unconstitutional before he scared the shit out of them by wanting to add more justices.

>> Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.
>It is.

Exactly. The constitution is for Americans, not illegal immigrants.

> His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.

We don't owe them illegal entry into this country to displace real Americans.

>> In the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism and right-wing Republicanism.

>As a Libertarian, I can not find it to be wise to vote for either of the two main political parties.

The Libs have no strength.

duke

unread,
May 4, 2017, 4:02:32 PM5/4/17
to
The mental deficiencies of the participants in this thread say a lot for poor
quality. You guys except for cloud couldn't even come close to what I really
am.

duke

unread,
May 4, 2017, 4:05:27 PM5/4/17
to
And truthful accuracy.

> His extreme right wing defense of the Catholic Church
>and his love of the Republican Party do provide a welcome degree of
>humour that this NG sometimes lacks.

There is no comparison to the Catholic Church. And now it's time for the
Republicans to set this country straight.

>But if you can't take him any longer then kill file him. He'll like it
>in the warm and cozy dark of the bozo bin.

Yet the sad part is that doing so pretty well establishes the point that I've
nailed you with no comeback on your part.

That's the sad commentary on the kill file. Being able to compete with me is
simply not there.

Kit

unread,
May 4, 2017, 5:02:36 PM5/4/17
to
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 4:01:15 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:07:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit <youngbl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:01:17 AM UTC-7, Kit wrote:
> >> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
> >>
> >> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
> >
> >Compared to today's Democrats JFK was a lot closer to the Republicans of today than the Democrats of today. JFK is quoted as saying he would have voted for Nixon if he himself had not won the nomination because he did not think any of the other democrats were tough enough on communism.
>
> Well, well, well. And what have I been saying but exactly that.
>
> >> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq.
>
> >I think they did less harm to the country than Obama's policies did.
> > He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).
>
> What the heck. 'rats are now saying the same thing. Even they are coming to
> realize how bad 'ratbama was.
>
> >I don't think he was the worst ever, that would be FDR whose policies hurt the country forever after. At least the ones that the SCOTUS did not rule unconstitutional before he scared the shit out of them by wanting to add more justices.
>
> >> Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.
> >It is.
>
> Exactly. The constitution is for Americans, not illegal immigrants.
>
> > His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>
> We don't owe them illegal entry into this country to displace real Americans.
>

What if the Native Americans (Indians) held a similar idea?

Kit

unread,
May 4, 2017, 5:05:06 PM5/4/17
to
Asteroid7, Saint Else Where, and bilgat are the ones that can compete with you, duke.

raven1

unread,
May 4, 2017, 8:57:24 PM5/4/17
to
On Thu, 4 May 2017 08:02:09 +0100, pfj...@google.com (PeteFJ) wrote:

>Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:
>
>> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is
>> saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's
>> mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith.
>> Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political
>> philosophy.
>>
>> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously
>> concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a
>> Democrat could be capable of anything good.
>>
>> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly
>> compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush
>> disastrous intervention in Iraq. He simply concludes Obama was the worst
>> president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively
>> refers to as 'rats).
>>
>> Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the
>> baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of
>> illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing. His
>> Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these
>> aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested
>> in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>>
>> I the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging
>> duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend
>> ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism

It should be noted here that Duke knows very little about what his own
Church actually teaches. Every time he tries to discuss even the most
rudimentary theology, he wanders off into heresy almost immediately.

bil...@m.nu

unread,
May 4, 2017, 9:11:23 PM5/4/17
to
On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com>
wrote:

To understand duke one must look stupidity in the eye and say........

Ahh that must be what it means to be a theist....

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
May 5, 2017, 1:26:55 AM5/5/17
to

On 04 May 2017 01:01 PM ,duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:07:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit <youngbl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:01:17 AM UTC-7, Kit wrote:
> >> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
> >>
> >> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
> >
> >Compared to today's Democrats JFK was a lot closer to the Republicans of today than the Democrats of today. JFK is quoted as saying he would have voted for Nixon if he himself had not won the nomination because he did not think any of the other democrats were tough enough on communism.
>
> Well, well, well. And what have I been saying but exactly that.
>
> >> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq.
>
> >I think they did less harm to the country than Obama's policies did.
> > He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).
>
> What the heck. 'rats are now saying the same thing. Even they are coming to
> realize how bad 'ratbama was.

Provide evidence for this utterly ridiculous assertion.




> >I don't think he was the worst ever, that would be FDR whose policies hurt the country forever after. At least the ones that the SCOTUS did not rule unconstitutional before he scared the shit out of them by wanting to add more justices.
>
> >> Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.
> >It is.
>
> Exactly. The constitution is for Americans, not illegal immigrants.

Wrong again. The Constitution is for everyone in the US.




> > His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>
> We don't owe them illegal entry into this country to displace real Americans.

Where are they doing that?

They either start their own businesses and hire people or they work at the jobs Americans won't and can't do. Farmers are already having a really hard time getting their crops harvested as people are too terrified to go to work, even those who are here legally.



> >> In the future, I would recommend those interested posters to avoid engaging duke, for he is mentally deficient, and is completely unable to comprehend ideas and concepts foreign to his basic Catholicism and right-wing Republicanism.
>
> >As a Libertarian, I can not find it to be wise to vote for either of the two main political parties.
>
> The Libs have no strength.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post


default

unread,
May 5, 2017, 7:48:24 AM5/5/17
to
On Fri, 05 May 2017 00:26:48 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgoogle.com> wrote:

>displace real Americans

Real Americans who immigrated to the continent and displaced the other
people living there. (by dint of numbers, superior weapons, and
cultural differences)

Don Martin

unread,
May 5, 2017, 10:21:49 AM5/5/17
to
On Fri, 05 May 2017 07:48:24 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>
wrote:
You left out smallpox and a few other classic European diseases that
killed off more Americans than our more visible weapons ever dreampt
of.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
Je pense, donc je suis Charlie.

duke

unread,
May 5, 2017, 4:48:47 PM5/5/17
to
On Thu, 4 May 2017 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 4:01:15 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:07:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit <youngbl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:01:17 AM UTC-7, Kit wrote:
>> >> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>> >>
>> >> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
>> >
>> >Compared to today's Democrats JFK was a lot closer to the Republicans of today than the Democrats of today. JFK is quoted as saying he would have voted for Nixon if he himself had not won the nomination because he did not think any of the other democrats were tough enough on communism.
>>
>> Well, well, well. And what have I been saying but exactly that.
>>
>> >> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq.
>>
>> >I think they did less harm to the country than Obama's policies did.
>> > He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).
>>
>> What the heck. 'rats are now saying the same thing. Even they are coming to
>> realize how bad 'ratbama was.
>>
>> >I don't think he was the worst ever, that would be FDR whose policies hurt the country forever after. At least the ones that the SCOTUS did not rule unconstitutional before he scared the shit out of them by wanting to add more justices.
>>
>> >> Unfortunately, when his two belief systems collide, he is dominated by the baser of the two. For example, duke is concerned about the flow of illegal immigrants. He Republicanism tell him this is a bad thing.
>> >It is.
>>
>> Exactly. The constitution is for Americans, not illegal immigrants.
>>
>> > His Catholicism, if it were his overriding principle, would tell him these aliens are principally his Catholic brethren, and he should be interested in their welfare. But, alas, it does not.
>>
>> We don't owe them illegal entry into this country to displace real Americans.

>What if the Native Americans (Indians) held a similar idea?

They're real Americans.

duke

unread,
May 5, 2017, 4:50:13 PM5/5/17
to
On Fri, 05 May 2017 00:26:48 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgoogle.com>
wrote:

>
>On 04 May 2017 01:01 PM ,duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:07:13 -0700 (PDT), Cloud Hobbit <youngbl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 8:01:17 AM UTC-7, Kit wrote:
>> >> After years one reading duke's posts, and trying to scrutinize what he is saying and why he thinks the ways he does, I have concluded that duke's mind consists of two basic ideas. One, Catholicism is the one true faith. Two, that right-wing Republicanism is the one correct political philosophy.
>> >>
>> >> For example, duke believes that JFK was a good president. He erroneously concludes that JFK was a Republican. His mind cannot comprehend how a Democrat could be capable of anything good.
>> >
>> >Compared to today's Democrats JFK was a lot closer to the Republicans of today than the Democrats of today. JFK is quoted as saying he would have voted for Nixon if he himself had not won the nomination because he did not think any of the other democrats were tough enough on communism.
>>
>> Well, well, well. And what have I been saying but exactly that.
>>
>> >> Duke claims Obama was the worst president ever. He cannot honestly compare Obama's presidency to Nixon's Watergate scandal or George W. Bush disastrous intervention in Iraq.
>>
>> >I think they did less harm to the country than Obama's policies did.
>> > He simply concludes Obama was the worst president ever simply because he was a Democrat (whom he often derisively refers to as 'rats).
>>
>> What the heck. 'rats are now saying the same thing. Even they are coming to
>> realize how bad 'ratbama was.
>
>Provide evidence for this utterly ridiculous assertion.

Even senator Pocahontas from Massachusetts is saying it.

duke

unread,
May 5, 2017, 4:51:46 PM5/5/17
to
I rarely exchange ideas with them. Bilgat lives in a coconut tree.

duke

unread,
May 5, 2017, 4:52:32 PM5/5/17
to
You're becoming a real flop. Would you like to engage in discussion?

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
May 5, 2017, 11:10:55 PM5/5/17
to
Where? Provide a source.

duke

unread,
May 6, 2017, 3:03:12 PM5/6/17
to
On Fri, 05 May 2017 22:10:49 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgoogle.com>
Are you even remotely able to care for yourself.

Smiler

unread,
May 6, 2017, 10:12:28 PM5/6/17
to
Are you even remotely able to tell the truth?

> *****
> "Telling lies is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

--
Smiler,
The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made to
exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
May 7, 2017, 12:01:32 AM5/7/17
to
On Sun, 7 May 2017 02:12:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smi...@jo.king>
wrote:
Of course not.

Kevrob

unread,
May 7, 2017, 4:52:37 AM5/7/17
to
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 10:21:49 AM UTC-4, Don Martin wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2017 07:48:24 -0400, default <def...@defaulter.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 05 May 2017 00:26:48 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas"
> ><hlwd...@NOSPAMgoogle.com> wrote:
> >
> >>displace real Americans
> >
> >Real Americans who immigrated to the continent and displaced the other
> >people living there. (by dint of numbers, superior weapons, and
> >cultural differences)
>
> You left out smallpox and a few other classic European diseases that
> killed off more Americans than our more visible weapons ever dreampt
> of.
> --

To be fair to the "immigrants of the 1600s," disease transmission was
not well understood then. Germ theory didn't really supplant "miasma
theory" until well into the 1800s. Almost all deaths of native tribal
people from European diseases prior to the mid-19th C were unplanned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miasma_theory v

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease#Development

Kevin R

Kevrob

unread,
May 7, 2017, 4:57:32 AM5/7/17
to
On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 4:48:47 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2017 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT), Kit <kit...@netzero.com> wrote:

>
> >What if the Native Americans (Indians) held a similar idea?
>
> They're real Americans.

As the saying goes, "that's mighty white of you."

Kevin R


Don Martin

unread,
May 7, 2017, 11:50:32 AM5/7/17
to
On Sun, 7 May 2017 01:52:34 -0700 (PDT), Kevrob <kev...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
Right. Those 16th century types had the comfort of supposing that all
those convenient Indian deaths were the work of a beneficent god at
the side of the white man. Good thing, too--it was beyond their
technology to make that many bullets in so short a time.

duke

unread,
May 7, 2017, 4:26:58 PM5/7/17
to
They are not white as you call them redman.

duke

unread,
May 7, 2017, 4:27:57 PM5/7/17
to
On Sun, 7 May 2017 02:12:24 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smi...@jo.king> wrote:

Yep, even with both of my hands off the keyboard.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

Smiler

unread,
May 7, 2017, 11:49:26 PM5/7/17
to
Another lie.

> *****
> "Mass hysteria is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
May 8, 2017, 4:32:55 AM5/8/17
to
And once again poor poor dukie admits he lied.

duke

unread,
May 10, 2017, 7:48:12 AM5/10/17
to
You mean you actually have to use your hands with the keyboard?

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

duke

unread,
May 10, 2017, 7:48:37 AM5/10/17
to
On Mon, 08 May 2017 03:32:49 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgoogle.com>
Your cup is empty.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
May 10, 2017, 9:51:22 PM5/10/17
to
<snippage of yet another non sequitur>

And by posgting yet another non sequitur, you've corroborated the fact that you lied.

duke

unread,
May 11, 2017, 2:39:49 PM5/11/17
to
On Wed, 10 May 2017 20:51:15 -0500, "Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgoogle.com>
Your trash talk.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
May 12, 2017, 2:28:50 AM5/12/17
to
Thanks for admitting you're lying once again.

Smiler

unread,
May 12, 2017, 9:50:14 PM5/12/17
to
I don't use my penis to type on the keyboard like you do.

> *****
> "Masturbation is the most perfect form of Prayer."
> Pope Paul VI *****

duke

unread,
May 13, 2017, 2:30:28 PM5/13/17
to
You don't have one, do you? Haahaahaa.

the dukester, American-American

*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
0 new messages