Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Colorized Photo of Lee Oswald

134 views
Skip to first unread message

John McAdams

unread,
Aug 23, 2014, 8:45:10 PM8/23/14
to
A very good job of colorizing a black and white photo of Lee Oswald in
custody.

http://www.inspire52.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/62.jpg

Of course, I'm not convinced that this sort of thing should ever be
done, therefore I'm not bowled over by the technical sophistication
required to do it.

.John

P.S. More here:

http://www.inspire52.com/colored-old-photos/

--
The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

tims...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 24, 2014, 12:24:22 AM8/24/14
to
I've always wondered who the guy behind Oswald wearing the glasses is.
Anybody know?

Curious Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!

Tom Ross Lee

unread,
Aug 24, 2014, 6:00:40 PM8/24/14
to
The color photo has been altered.

Marcus Hanson

unread,
Aug 24, 2014, 7:24:48 PM8/24/14
to
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:45:10 AM UTC+10, John McAdams wrote:
> A very good job of colorizing a black and white photo of Lee Oswald in
>
> custody.
>
>
>
> http://www.inspire52.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/62.jpg
>
>
>
> Of course, I'm not convinced that this sort of thing should ever be
>
> done, therefore I'm not bowled over by the technical sophistication
>
> required to do it.

> .John

Proof that the assassination was "the most photographically altered event
in history".

I've seen the Churchill pic before. Unsurprisingly,it is my favourite one.
I did not recognise Jimmy Stewart,even though he is one of my top three
actors of all time.And by all accounts,a very fine man,too.

Einstein's photo proves the old adage that you =can= look suave in brown -
but only if you're Gregory Peck !

Only now as I write does an odd coincidence occur to me : many of the
subjects would be on my fantasy dinner-party guest list.

I can see why you might not be too keen on colorisation. But for me,the
photos enhance the reality of history. Oh well,each to their own.

stevemg...@yahoo.com

unread,
Aug 24, 2014, 9:26:44 PM8/24/14
to
Oswald's raggedy shirt does come through.

Torn shirt, torn sweater, no car, no home, no phone, no typewriter, no
stocks or bonds or wealth, no savings account..... He had nothing.

Oswald was desperately poor all the time he was in the US. Not a little
poor; desperately so.

And yet he's an important CIA officer sent to infiltrate the Soviet Union?
In the middle of the Cold War? That's pretty important. And then he was
going to go to Cuba to kill Castro? Or was he working for the FBI
infiltrating left wing groups (how many did he infiltrate?: zero).

Was he doing all of this for free?

Or is it he didn't want to live a lavish lifestyle - like have a phone -
because that would reveal his secret life working for the CIA? I guess if
he had a old 1955 Chevy with 200,000 miles on it the neighbors would
conclude that he got it for his CIA work?

At some point the conspiracy advocates have to confront logic and facts.

Dont' they?


Jean Davison

unread,
Aug 24, 2014, 11:28:18 PM8/24/14
to
On 8/23/2014 7:45 PM, John McAdams wrote:
> A very good job of colorizing a black and white photo of Lee Oswald in
> custody.
>
> http://www.inspire52.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/62.jpg
>
> Of course, I'm not convinced that this sort of thing should ever be
> done, therefore I'm not bowled over by the technical sophistication
> required to do it.
>
> ..John
I was surprised to find that there's a color photo of Oswald listed
on the City of Dallas website. It's not visible there but I think this
is it:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/celebrity/killers/lee-harvey-oswald

It fits the description given at the Dallas site:

QUOTE:
>>>
Box 11, Folder 4

1. Photograph. Color slide of Lee Harvey Oswald sitting down, with mug
shot style number card showing. This item not scanned or microfilmed to
prevent damage ....
>>>>
UNQUOTE

http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/box11.htm

Jean







claviger

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 5:13:53 PM8/25/14
to
Jean,

Thank you

claviger

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 5:14:07 PM8/25/14
to
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 10:28:18 PM UTC-5, Jean Davison wrote:
Jean,

Was there a profile mugshot too? Notice how tan his arms, neck, and face are. Wonder if that came from his Mexico City trip?



Anthony Marsh

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 5:15:37 PM8/25/14
to
Can you show me a way to colorize a black and white photo without using
a computer?


Anthony Marsh

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 5:18:59 PM8/25/14
to
Do you know anything about photography or computers?
Can you explain how to colorize a black and white photo without using a
computer?


Robert Harris

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 5:21:06 PM8/25/14
to
John McAdams wrote:
> A very good job of colorizing a black and white photo of Lee Oswald in
> custody.
>
> http://www.inspire52.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/62.jpg
>
> Of course, I'm not convinced that this sort of thing should ever be
> done, therefore I'm not bowled over by the technical sophistication
> required to do it.

Wow!

Whoever said you couldn't handle the tough issues!?







Robert Harris

cmikes

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 5:22:47 PM8/25/14
to
Well, it's been 50 years so maybe someday soon they will, but I'm not holding my breath.

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 7:24:25 PM8/25/14
to
On 8/24/2014 9:26 PM, stevemg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 7:45:10 PM UTC-5, John McAdams wrote:
>> A very good job of colorizing a black and white photo of Lee Oswald in
>>
>> custody.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.inspire52.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/62.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course, I'm not convinced that this sort of thing should ever be
>>
>> done, therefore I'm not bowled over by the technical sophistication
>>
>> required to do it.
>>
>>
>>
>> .John
>>
>>
>>
>> P.S. More here:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.inspire52.com/colored-old-photos/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> The Kennedy Assassination Home Page
>>
>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm
>
> Oswald's raggedy shirt does come through.
>
> Torn shirt, torn sweater, no car, no home, no phone, no typewriter, no
> stocks or bonds or wealth, no savings account..... He had nothing.
>
> Oswald was desperately poor all the time he was in the US. Not a little
> poor; desperately so.
>
> And yet he's an important CIA officer sent to infiltrate the Soviet Union?
> In the middle of the Cold War? That's pretty important. And then he was
> going to go to Cuba to kill Castro? Or was he working for the FBI
> infiltrating left wing groups (how many did he infiltrate?: zero).
>

What do you want to do, blow his cover?

> Was he doing all of this for free?
>

My father worked for the CIA for $1 a year.
It's not about the money. Maybe everything is only about the money for
you, but some people are patriotic.

> Or is it he didn't want to live a lavish lifestyle - like have a phone -
> because that would reveal his secret life working for the CIA? I guess if
> he had a old 1955 Chevy with 200,000 miles on it the neighbors would
> conclude that he got it for his CIA work?
>

It was the flashy new car that tipped off the CIA about Aldrich Ames.

> At some point the conspiracy advocates have to confront logic and facts.
>

Some of us have real world experience rather than just guessing as you do.

> Dont' they?
>
>


Jason Burke

unread,
Aug 25, 2014, 8:13:35 PM8/25/14
to
Ever hear of crayons, Marsh?


Marcus Hanson

unread,
Aug 26, 2014, 12:52:35 PM8/26/14
to
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:13:35 AM UTC+10, Jason Burke wrote:

> Ever hear of crayons, Marsh?

Beat me to it,Jason !

Just in case Anthony was =not= being facetious :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2Srw245R7U

This was on that interweb thingy,which you can get (allegedly) off one of
them computer thingies.

Facetious : I believe that is the shortest word in the English language
with all five vowels in alphabetical order.



0 new messages