Re: Einstein's God Can Be Found In A Circle aka Donut ;) Re: Warping Time and Space Re: PSI Remote Viewing and The Universe Re: Edmo Corp sells Mind Control Antennas
"tome bearden,"tombearden
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:42:54 -0600, "Carl R.
why don't you ask lockheed?
>Osterwald" <i...@mac.com> wrote:
why don't you ask tom bearden?
>>In article <11rsa0h47bv61deqj...@4ax.com>, Scalar
>><g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:49:56 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:47:38 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:33:57 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>
>>Replying to yourself 4 times is a kooksign, Barbie.
>
>Nah, it's just continuing a thought.
trying to be more kooky that the other kooks? alexa aka scalar?
> Glad you read it.
trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
>;)
why don't you ask pol pot?
>>
>>> >>
>>> >>>Also change the vibration of matter and matter can move thought matter of a
>>> >>>different vibration.
>>> >>
>>> >>This is based on the model of the Universe and intersecting galaxies.
>>> >>Thought is operational on the same pattern.
>>> >>
>>> >>The Donut Universe is a complete 3D repeating model of itself.
>>> >
>>> >And the final thought for today:
>>> >
>>> >Independent thought (creation) happens when one's mind bumps into another's
>>> >mind, in the universal mind.
>>> >
>>> >Thought is a duplicate "holographic" model of the Universe.
>>>
>>>
>>> Put the two together, the Donut Universe and the Universal mind using the
>>> above and you have all of creation, and you've found Einstein's god in a
>>> circle.
>>
>>I'll bet you thought about all this stuff while driving the Barbie pink
>>jeep to the beach for fun, sun, and surf!
>
>Heh, well no.
why don't you ask the nsa?
>
>The third 'ingredient' in Einstein's God is Life.
why don't you ask staline?
>
>It's a trilogy: The Universe, The Universal Mind and Life.
even a child could understand your clownesque view of cosmology.
>
>(aka father, son, and holy ghost, if you will)
>
>I cared enough to think about it in order to prevent the
>death of lives and to share it.
trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
why don't you ask lockheed?
>
>That's all.
trying to make a fool out of yourself again, alexa aka scalar?
--
Kook Alexa for clueless newbie of the month!
"tome bearden,"tombearden
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:12:14 -0700, edens morgan mair fheal greykitten
>tomys
>des anges <mair_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
why don't you ask the nsa?
>>In article <11rsa0h47bv61deqj...@4ax.com>, Scalar <g...@dom.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:49:56 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:47:38 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:33:57 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>
>>thats impressive
>
><smile> When 2 people understand what the other is communicating (meeting
>of the minds) they recognize each other as 'same' and can use each other's
>minds to learn -- much like a neural network, which is basically what the
>Universal mind is, which is embedded in the 'sponge' matrix of matter.
why don't you ask tom bearden?
>
>
>It's one of the greatest 'thrills' of living.
Scalar
>In msg <nbusa0998ho79l4g1...@4ax.com>, alexa aka scalar wrote:
>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:42:54 -0600, "Carl R.
>
>why don't you ask lockheed?
Lockheed isn't talking, they're in the business of keeping things secret,
they are the NSA! And besides if Lockheed knew, they might tell everyone
because "Einstein's" 3D repeating model of the Universe, the Universal mind
+ life explains most everything. Isn't that what a hypothesis is about?
>
>>Osterwald" <i...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>
>why don't you ask tom bearden?
Bearden is in the business of selling his ideas.
>
>>>In article <11rsa0h47bv61deqj...@4ax.com>, Salar
>>><g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:49:56 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:47:38 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:33:57 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Replying to yourself 4 times is a kooksign, Barbie.
>>
>>Nah, it's just continuing a thought.
>
>trying to be more kooky that the other kooks? alexa aka scalar?
Is not a kook a name others call people because they don't understand?
>> Glad you read it.
>
>trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
Nah, just looking for another mind to share thought with.
>
>>;)
>
>
>why don't you ask pol pot?
He killed people, dead people don't think, they're no fun!
>
>>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>>Also change the vibration of matter and matter can move thought matter of a
>>>> >>>different vibration.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>This is based on the model of the Universe and intersecting galaxies.
>>>> >>Thought is operational on the same pattern.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>The Donut Universe is a complete 3D repeating model of itself.
>>>> >
>>>> >And the final thought for today:
>>>> >
>>>> >Independent thought (creation) happens when one's mind bumps into another's
>>>> >mind, in the universal mind.
>>>> >
>>>> >Thought is a duplicate "holographic" model of the Universe.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Put the two together, the Donut Universe and the Universal mind using the
>>>> above and you have all of creation, and you've found Einstein's god in a
>>>> circle.
>>>
>>>I'll bet you thought about all this stuff while driving the Barbie pink
>>>jeep to the beach for fun, sun, and surf!
>>
>>Heh, well no.
>
>why don't you ask the nsa?
See above aka Lockheed.
>
>>
>>The third 'ingredient' in Einstein's God is Life.
>
>why don't you ask staline?
Stalin was into controlling thought, not setting it free.
>
>>
>>It's a trilogy: The Universe, The Universal Mind and Life.
>
>even a child could understand your clownesque view of cosmology.
>
>>
>>(aka father, son, and holy ghost, if you will)
>>
>>I cared enough to think about it in order to prevent the
>>death of lives and to share it.
>
>trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
One is a lonely number. It needs 2
>why don't you ask lockheed?
>
>>
>>That's all.
>
>trying to make a fool out of yourself again, alexa aka scalar?
Was the assumption that was*intelligent* life on this planet incorrect?
"tom bearden"tombearden
>>>On 22 May 2004 00:50:19 GMT, "tome bearden,"tombearden,@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
bearden is a cracpot!
>>In msg <nbusa0998ho79l4g1...@4ax.com>, alexa aka scalar wrote:
>>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:42:54 -0600, "Carl R.
>>
>>why don't you ask lockheed?
>
>Lockheed isn't talking, they're in the business of keeping things secret,
>they are the NSA!
alexa aka scalar's screed!
> And besides if Lockheed knew, they might tell everyone
>because "Einstein's" 3D repeating model of the Universe, the Universal
>mind
>+ life explains most everything.
if you want lockheed's attention, why don't you contact them yourself,
instead of spamming the newsgroups with your endless screed?
> Isn't that what a hypothesis is about?
(screed)
>>
>>>Osterwald" <i...@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>why don't you ask tom bearden?
>
>Bearden is in the business of selling his ideas.
bearden is a cracpot!
>>
>>>>In article <11rsa0h47bv61deqj...@4ax.com>, Salar
>>>><g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:49:56 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:47:38 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>On Fri, 21 May 2004 20:33:57 GMT, Scalar <g...@dom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Replying to yourself 4 times is a kooksign, Barbie.
>>>
>>>Nah, it's just continuing a thought.
>>
>>trying to be more kooky that the other kooks? alexa aka scalar?
>
>Is not a kook a name others call people because they don't understand?
why don't you ask lockheed?
>>> Glad you read it.
>>
>>trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
>
>Nah, just looking for another mind to share thought with.
trying to be more kooky that the other kooks? alexa aka scalar?
>>
>>>;)
>>
>>
>>why don't you ask pol pot?
>
>He killed people, dead people don't think, they're no fun!
trying to obtain attention with you drivel again, alexa aka scalar?
>>
>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>>Also change the vibration of matter and matter can move thought matter of a
>>>>> >>>different vibration.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>This is based on the model of the Universe and intersecting galaxies.
>>>>> >>Thought is operational on the same pattern.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>The Donut Universe is a complete 3D repeating model of itself.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >And the final thought for today:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Independent thought (creation) happens when one's mind bumps into another's
>>>>> >mind, in the universal mind.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Thought is a duplicate "holographic" model of the Universe.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Put the two together, the Donut Universe and the Universal mind using the
>>>>> above and you have all of creation, and you've found Einstein's god in a
>>>>> circle.
>>>>
>>>>I'll bet you thought about all this stuff while driving the Barbie pink
>>>>jeep to the beach for fun, sun, and surf!
>>>
>>>Heh, well no.
>>
>>why don't you ask the nsa?
>
>See above aka Lockheed.
we're in for another screedfest!
>>
>>>
>>>The third 'ingredient' in Einstein's God is Life.
>>
>>why don't you ask staline?
>
>Stalin was into controlling thought, not setting it free.
little alexa aka scalar doesn't understand physics!
>>
>>>
>>>It's a trilogy: The Universe, The Universal Mind and Life.
>>
>>even a child could understand your clownesque view of cosmology.
>>
>>>
>>>(aka father, son, and holy ghost, if you will)
>>>
>>>I cared enough to think about it in order to prevent the
>>>death of lives and to share it.
>>
>>trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
>
>One is a lonely number.
trying to obtain attention with you drivel again, alexa aka scalar?
> It needs 2
why don't you ask pol pot?
>>why don't you ask lockheed?
>>
>>>
>>>That's all.
>>
>>trying to make a fool out of yourself again, alexa aka scalar?
>
>Was the assumption that was*intelligent* life on this planet incorrect?
alexa aka scalar never had any physics class!
Scalar
>In msg <46ata05fi5achp65v...@4ax.com>, alexa aka scalar wrote:
>>>>On 22 May 2004 00:50:19 GMT, "tome bearden,"tombearden,@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>
>
>bearden is a cracpot!
Why is Bearden a crac(k)pot?
>
>>>In msg <nbusa0998ho79l4g1...@4ax.com>, alexa aka scalar wrote:
>>>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:42:54 -0600, "Carl R.
>>>
>>>why don't you ask lockheed?
>>
>>Lockheed isn't talking, they're in the business of keeping things secret,
>>they are the NSA!
>
>alexa aka scalar's screed!
>
>> And besides if Lockheed knew, they might tell everyone
>>because "Einstein's" 3D repeating model of the Universe, the Universal
>>mind
>>+ life explains most everything.
>
>if you want lockheed's attention, why don't you contact them yourself,
>instead of spamming the newsgroups with your endless screed?
Oh Echelon gets everything. And they look at all of my posts, so I'm sure
they've passed everything to the politically correct people. :)
Physics is the study of the physical, Newton was a physicist, before physics
was a "scholarly' science. Everything is based on observation.
I observe, I report my thoughts, ideas (hypothesis), if the model fits _>
bingo!
Besides, every science class I ever took couldn't answer all of my
questions, so I had to think on my own.
"tom bearden"tombearden
>>>On 22 May 2004 01:26:01 GMT, "tom bearden"tombearden,@crackmail.corn>
>wrote:
why don't you ask the nsa?
why don't you ask the cia?
>>In msg <46ata05fi5achp65v...@4ax.com>, alexa aka scalar wrote:
>>>>>On 22 May 2004 00:50:19 GMT, "tome bearden,"tombearden,@hotmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>bearden is a cracpot!
>
>Why is Bearden a crac(k)pot?
bearden is a cracpot!
>>
>>>>In msg <nbusa0998ho79l4g1...@4ax.com>, alexa aka scalar wrote:
>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2004 15:42:54 -0600, "Carl R.
>>>>
>>>>why don't you ask lockheed?
>>>
>>>Lockheed isn't talking, they're in the business of keeping things secret,
>>>they are the NSA!
>>
>>alexa aka scalar's screed!
>>
>>> And besides if Lockheed knew, they might tell everyone
>>>because "Einstein's" 3D repeating model of the Universe, the Universal
>>>mind
>>>+ life explains most everything.
>>
>>if you want lockheed's attention, why don't you contact them yourself,
>>instead of spamming the newsgroups with your endless screed?
>
>Oh Echelon gets everything.
why don't you ask staline?
> And they look at all of my posts, so I'm sure
>they've passed everything to the politically correct people.
trying to obtain attention with you drivel, alexa aka scalar?
>:)
why don't you ask the voices in your head?
why don't you ask bechtel?
>
>Besides, every science class I ever took couldn't answer all of my
>questions, so I had to think on my own.
trying to gain credibility by spamming, alexa aka scalar?