It used to be that loud music meant (relatively) uniform volume among
bass, mid-range and high frequencies. To get significant low bass you had
to bring up more of the entire spectrum along with it, even with an
equalizer. In most homes and cars there weren't dedicated, discrete
woofers that could output extreme bass levels with the rest of the music
reasonably quiet. Many subwoofers can create output that older all-in-one
speaker enclosures weren't even capable of. Many young people seek music
specifically for its bass content as a primal ritual like banging heavy
drums.
Because of its long wavelengths and ability to travel through walls that
attenuate mid-range and high frequencies, low bass (typically 40 to 100
Hz) has become a pervasive annoyance across the nation. It has the effect
of a wall being pounded on with no physical contact. Imagine someone
bouncing a basketball off your wall for hours on end. The malice
perpetrated with a subwoofer should be treated as equally belligerent,
even without physical wall contact.
This presents an especially big nuisance in dwellings with shared walls
that have a minimal air-gap for sound insulation. Scofflaws in apartments
can listen to "low level" music with the bass curve far out of
proportion, and claim that it doesn't exceed allowed dB levels, even
though they know full well it's disturbing their neighbors.
Subwoofers would ideally be banned altogether in apartments and condos.
Too many people lack the self-control to use them respectfully. Some are
addicted to bass like a drug, or blast it in their cars to show off and
mark territory. Few humans alive today have not been exposed to "boom-
cars," even in isolated rural areas. But legal details don't seem to have
caught up with loudspeaker technology.
Below are excerpts from a California city noise code as a generic
example. The lowest frequency mentioned is 500 Hz, which is mid-bass,
well above the output of a typical subwoofer. This is probably because
it's much harder to measure low bass where dB meters are less sensitive.
-----
Radios, tape players on publicly owned property:
(a) As used in this section, the phrase "a person of normal hearing
sensitivity" means a person who has a hearing threshold level of between
zero decibels and 25 decibels HL averaged over the frequencies 500, 1,000
and 2,000 hertz.
(b) Notwithstanding any other section of this Code and in addition
thereto, it is unlawful for any person to permit or cause any noise,
sound, music or program to be emitted from any radio, tape player, tape
recorder, record player or television outdoors on or in any publicly
owned property, park or place when such noise, sound, music or program is
audible to a person of normal hearing sensitivity 100 feet from the
radio, tape player, tape recorder, record player or television.
Interior noise standards:
(a) In any apartment, condominium, townhouse, duplex or multiple-dwelling
unit, it is unlawful for any person to create any noise from inside his
or her unit that causes the noise level, when measured in a neighboring
unit during the periods 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., to exceed the following:
(1) Forty-five dBA for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in
any hour.
(2) Fifty dBA for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any
hour.
(3) Fifty-five dBA for any period of time.
-----
Subwoofer crimes require sophisticated equipment to document without
first-hand observations, and police generally lack time to witness noise
events. My Radio Shack dB meter won't pick up much below mid-range unless
it's right in front of a speaker. I have dealt with "home invasion" bass
almost daily after a neighboring apartment was bought by a slumlord. It's
loud enough to cause constant stress but not enough to measure easily.
The tenants are too evil to care and the owner won't take action, nor
will the property management company. Calling the police would make my
life hell around these criminals.
In the absence of an official witness for repeat incidents (impractical),
how do you technically get someone evicted who only sends low bass
through your walls?
Jim
You are correct that Db meters are often not sensitive below 40 Hz. I
think that replacing the microphone with one designed for bass response may
fix this. But that's an engineering problem and won't help you now.
From what you have posted it sounds as if you have neighbors who play loud
music. You can hear this music in your apartment. You won't call the cops or
complain out of fear. So how will better Db meters or better laws help?
The first step in any noise complaint should be discussing the issue
calmly with your neighbors. I note here that you do not want them to turn it
down, you want them evicted. That's not an attitude that will help you.
Good luck,
Dave M.
Db meters are deliberately made with a specific frequency response,
(perhaps something approximating the human ear response) and this
frequency response often specifically called out in regulations
(e.g. OSHA rules about workplace noise levels).
The dbA weighting cuts out most of the bass. The dbC weighting
doesn't, and is intended more to represent the human ear at very
high noise levels, such as for traffic studies.
>think that replacing the microphone with one designed for bass response may
>fix this. But that's an engineering problem and won't help you now.
It won't fix the problem for another reason - if it doesn't make
the measurement the way the regulation says, you can't use it to
invoke the regulation. You have to use a properly calibrated meter,
where properly calibrated depends on the regulation.
I suspect I could make a very loud siren that reads silence at the
3 frequencies mentioned and it still causes ear damage several
blocks away.
As I noted, calling the police would only escalate the problem; to the
point of vandalism or even violence.
They have been asked many times to turn down the bass and keep claiming
to be "cool" about it, yet make NO change to their behavior. They get
more belligerent each time, with glassy-eyed stares and jailhouse
language.
The clincher was when one of these creatures said FU! after he woke me up
with a car stereo just feet away from my sleeping area and I asked him to
turn it off. I even said "please" to the cretin, who had lost his right
to politeness six months prior. This was after a Sunday of his dumb kin
thumping bass inside the house for 6 hours. It creates stress similar to
combat duty. You never know when incoming rounds will arrive.
Those who've actually lived near avttref know that negotiation only works
on TV or movies with feel-good endings. In real life, avttref hold their
ground and take on a persecution complex, for they have been historically
wronged and therefor can do no wrong themselves.
So, I'm just looking for a technical way to document it (consumer
product?) and asking that ordinances be rewritten for this particular
modern noise problem.
Jim
*Some* Radio Shack sound level meters have settings where they can
measure dbC as well as dbA. I have one that does. (Cost about
$45. I got it when a question came up about whether the workplace
server room noise level exceeded safe levels. It didn't, but it
was close enough I got earplugs anyway. Real, official meters for
regulatory compliance are likely to cost thousands.)
However, you can't take a dbC measurement, point out that it exceeds
the noise levels specified in the ordinance as dbA, and expect to
get any help from the ordinance. They are different measurements,
as you'll find out if you try measuring dbA and dbC for the same
noise, even noise that doesn't have a lot of bass. dbC measures
frequences on the high end higher than dbA also.
You might manage to take measurements in dbC, and compare them to
levels that OSHA considers to be unsafe in the workplace (if OSHA
or other regulatory agencies uses dbC for that at all, the regulations
I found use dbA). However, from what you describe, this sound is
at a level that is *annoying*, not *damaging* and OSHA is concerned
about what's damaging.