>PD: Mesa Father Catches Man Molesting Daughter
>
>http://www.kpho.com/news/25813578/detail.html
>
>MESA, Ariz. -- A former school bus driver fondled a 9-year-old girl
>and the victim's father caught him in the act, police said.
>Mesa police arrested Billy Bryant, 62, on charges of child
>molestation.
>The incident happened Nov. 11. The father said he looked out his
>window and saw his daughter standing next to a silver car, being
>fondled by the driver, police said.
>
>PDF: Billy Bryant Arrest Report
>
>http://www.kpho.com/download/2010/1116/25816630.pd
>
>The father ran outside and found his daughter inside the car, again
>being fondled, according to officers. He pulled her out of the car and
>got the license number of the car as it drove off, police said.
>Police said the man recognized the driver as a frequent visitor to a
>family in the neighborhood. The father told officers his daughter
>knows the man as "Mr. Bill."
Clearly consensual.
--
Chucky
>PD: Mesa Father Catches Man Molesting Daughter
>
>http://www.kpho.com/news/25813578/detail.html
>
>MESA, Ariz. -- A former school bus driver fondled a 9-year-old girl
>and the victim's father caught him in the act, police said.
>Mesa police arrested Billy Bryant, 62, on charges of child
>molestation.
>The incident happened Nov. 11. The father said he looked out his
>window and saw his daughter standing next to a silver car, being
>fondled by the driver, police said.
Have you misread the article? Were you under the impression that it
was the father who was doing the groping?
Otherwise, why post this to the incest site?
For that matter, why post it to the boy-lovers site, as it involved a
girl being 'loved'?
You really are a Thule.
--
Pied Piper
Anyone ask the girl if she felt like she was a victim?
9 year old girl can't give consent. Get over it.
None of the article you copied implies that she considered herself a
victim.
--
Pied Piper
Ultimate Tool has a comprehension problem.
Right. So you have never met or talked to a 9 year old girl, have you?
The law says that minors can't give consent but they do it anyway.
The law says killing people is prohibited, people do it anyway.
The law says stealing is prohibited, people do it anyway.
The law says exceeding the posted speed limit is prohibited. people
do it anyway.
Where does it say the girl said she felt victimized?
All she said was "He touched me".
See, you exaggerate again.
> Patrol officers later located the vehicle parked outside Bryant's
> home.
>
> Bryant was interviewed by detectives and booked on two counts of child
> molestation, and aggravated assault.
>
> Police learned during the investigation that Bryant had also been a
> suspect in connection with a child molestation case from last year,
> but the case was closed because of a lack of witnesses.
>
> Bryant was a bus driver for Legacy Charter School, but was fired after
> the previous investigation.
>
> Police believe with the suspect's work history that there could be
> other victims and are investigating.
>
>
> Read more:
> http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/11/16/20101116mesa-child-molester-suspect-abrk.html#ixzz16vhXk7cN
>>
Ultima likes to embellish the facts.
> --
> Pied Piper
Even if she were being fondled by another 9 year old girl. The morons would
charge them with molesting each other.
And again and again and again! And we all know he will do it again and
again and again and again and again and again. How else would he get his
point across?
I've raised two daughters. Each of them, at one time, was 9 years old.
Let me rephrase. A 9 year old cannot give "knowledgeable" consent.
A 9 year old can certainly say "yes," but it doesn't stand up in a
court of law.
At one point neither could anything that a black man said stand up in a
court of law. That doesn't mean that they didn't have knowledge of what
they were doing or saying.
Splitting hairs. I do not believe a 9 year old can give knowledgeable
consent.
There is a major difference in molesting a 9 year old and pretending
she gave consent to the racist social laws Black Americans have had to
live under.
She is victimized whether she understands it or not.
Plenty of people didn't BELIEVE that a black man could give testimony in
court, either. We only call it "racist social laws" TODAY; they weren't
called that when those laws were being enforced.
She is a victim, damn it! And if that means that she has to be victimized
by the haters in order to prove it to her, they will do it!!!
You're comparing the actions of a racist people against an adult who
happened to have the "wrong" color skin to expecting a child under 10
years old to understand the nature of the offense that being acted
against her.
You are being foolish.
She's not being victimized by haters, she's being rescued from an
offensive arrangement.
I'm comparing people who didn't believe that black people could give
testimoy to people who don't believe that children can understand their own
bodies and things that are going on in their lives.
... by haters. And if she doesn't find it to be offensive that is just too
bad for her, right?
...and it's a stupid comparison.
She's 9 years old, she's not capable of comprehending what's being
done to her.
Well since you (especially in America) have, obviously, never given her
any knowledge you are most definitely right.
--
David
No email replies please.
FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #19 A:To be or not to
be. Q:What is the square root of 4b^2?
>On Jan 1, 12:37 pm, xxxxxxx...@hotmail.com (XXX) wrote:
By the haters.