The parallelism argument to mapasyncunordered doesn't seem to be effective.
According to the docs it seems like it will backpressure only if downstream also backpressures and futures count > parallelism.
On the other hand mapasync is limited by parallelism but it must wait for the first future in line to finish before starting the next one.
So my question is how can i achieve the same effect as with mapasync but using mapasyncunordered that the total amount of futures currently active by mapasyncunordered is limited by the parallelism argument and as soon as one future is done the next one will start (ie unordered).
Thanks
Hadar