JSF 2.3 Public Review, Adopt-a-JSR and You

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

In case you missed it, JSF 2.3 recently released it's public review
(this is the last review before the specification becomes proposed
final). Feel free to take a look at my write-up on the topic here:
http://blog.rahmannet.net/2017/01/jsf-23-public-review-starts-now.html.
This is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. This is a
JSR that has been very heavily driven by community contribution from the
start (and I mean many direct code commits). It is very well deserving
in terms of support from JUGs for that reason alone. If you are
interested, you should start a discussion in the copied Google Group.

The Philly JUG won't be adopting this particular JSR only because we are
adopting other extremely critical JSRs such as Java EE 8, Java EE
Security, Servlet 4 and Java SE 9.

If you have any questions on any of this I am happy to try to help the
best I can, including connecting you to the right folks.

Cheers,
Reza

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

In case you missed it, CDI 2 recently released it's public review (this

is the last review before the specification becomes proposed final).

Feel free to take a look at this excellent write-up on the topic here:
http://www.cdi-spec.org/news/2017/02/01/CDI_2_is_in_public_review/. This

is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. This is a JSR
that has been very heavily driven by community contribution from the

start and is one of the most open Java EE JSRs. It is very well

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

In case you missed it, Bean Validation 2 recently released it's early
draft review. Feel free to take a look at this excellent write-up on the
topic here:
http://beanvalidation.org/news/2017/02/14/bean-validation-2-0-early-draft-released/.

This is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. This is a

JSR that has been very heavily driven by community opinion from the

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

I am not sure how many of you are aware of the new JCP membership types
that were introduced last year. Here is my write-up on it:
http://blog.rahmannet.net/2017/03/new-java-community-process-jcp.html. A
lot of it is targeted towards JUGs and Adopt-a-JSR.

The Philly JUG has taken full advantage of these changes. If you have
any questions on any of this, I am happy to help.

Cheers,
Reza

[Cesar Augusto Nogueira]

Hey Reza,

awesome article about the new JCP Membership Types!

Could I work on to translate this article to Portuguese language and present it at my JUG?

Cesar Augusto Nogueira www.cesarnogueira.me

Contact: +55 19 9 9382-8181

Follow me on LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/cesarnog

Before printing, think about your commitment and responsibility to the environment.

[reza_rahman]

Yes, please do. In fact there is no reason to even give me credit. You can just use the text as you wish.

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hello Reza !

I loved your very explanatory article.

I am currently listed as a contributor to JSR-371 (MVC 1.0) and would like to hear some tips from you about good practices contributing to JSRs. If you can share some of your experiences in JSR.

Thank you
{ },s.

Daniel Dias dos Santos

Individual, Associate Member na Java Community Process (JCP)

Pós-Graduado em Desenvolvimento Java

Tecnólogo em Analise e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas

Claro – (21) 9 7468-2052

2017-03-02 19:02 GMT-03:00 Reza Rahman <reza_...@lycos.com>:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Adopt A JSR" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adopt-a-jsr+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to adopt...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/adopt-a-jsr.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adopt-a-jsr/7d0bde06-0e9e-20b8-973b-4de09c3d65d6%40lycos.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[reza_rahman]

Thanks very much for your kind words. The honest truth is that there is no right or wrong way to contribute. Any contribution is a helpful contribution. And believe me any contribution is very much appreciated, even if it is just supporting a JSR on paper.

Beyond this the only other thing I would say is ask the lead what would really help them.

What worries me is how few people contribute and how little they contribute.

I understand people are busy, but I would ask people to see this as an investment into their own future. That's how an old platform like Java can remain strong, not because of what vendors do or don't do.

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------

From: Daniel Dias Dos Santos <daniel.dias...@gmail.com>

Date: 3/3/17 12:23 AM (GMT-05:00)

To: adopt...@googlegroups.com

Cc: jug-l...@jugs.java.net

Subject: [jug-leaders] Re: New JCP Membership Types and What They Mean

[Daniel Dias Dos Santos]

Hello Reza!

I agree with your words, I contribute little, I'm still new to open source and would like to do more, both for community and for my professional growth. And the little that I have seen of the JSR's has added a lot of value and more enriching the knowledge in Java.

Many thanks for the tips.

hugs.

Daniel Dias dos Santos

Individual, Associate Member na Java Community Process (JCP)

Pós-Graduado em Desenvolvimento Java

Tecnólogo em Analise e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas

Claro – (21) 9 7468-2052

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adopt-a-jsr/58b9817d.117c240a.99b1b.7cd7SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

In case you missed it, Java EE Security recently released it's first
early draft review. Feel free to take a look at my write-up on the topic
here:
http://blog.rahmannet.net/2017/03/java-ee-security-early-draft-review.html.

This is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. This is a
JSR that has been very heavily driven by community contribution from the

start (and I mean many, many direct code commits). This is not a JSR
that honestly would have happened for Java EE 8 without the community
behind it. It is very well deserving in terms of support from JUGs for

that reason alone. If you are interested, you should start a discussion
in the copied Google Group.

The Philly JUG has long adopted this particular JSR in addition to Java
EE 8, Servlet 4 and Java SE 9.

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

In case you missed it, JAX-RS 2.1 recently released it's first early

draft review. Feel free to take a look at my write-up on the topic here:

http://blog.rahmannet.net/2017/03/jax-rs-21-early-draft-review-starts-now.html.
This is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. If you are

interested, you should start a discussion in the copied Google Group.

The Philly JUG won't be adopting this particular JSR only because we are
adopting other extremely critical JSRs such as Java EE 8, Java EE

Security, Servlet 4 and Java SE 9.

[Reza Rahman]

Folks,

In case you missed it, Servlet 4 just released it's public review (this

is the last review before the specification becomes proposed final).

Feel free to take a look at my write-up on the topic here:

http://blog.rahmannet.net/2017/04/servlet-4-public-review-starts-now.html.
This is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. Servlet 4
is easily the most critical component of Java EE 8. It is very well

deserving in terms of support from JUGs for that reason alone. If you
are interested, you should start a discussion in the copied Google Group.

The Philly JUG has long adopted this particular JSR in addition to Java

EE 8, Java EE Security and Java SE 9.

[Rahman USTA]

Hi Reza,

Is the reference implementation is ready for testing Servlet 4 ? especially the Push API?

Thanks.

--

Rahman USTA

Istanbul JUG

https://github.com/rahmanusta

[Reza Rahman]

I have not tested it myself, but according to Ed Burns' post, it is.

[Michael Akerman]

I'm getting "Cannot load M3U8: Crossdomain access denied" when trying to watch the linked screencast.

 

http://www.captechconsulting.com/videos/http2-and-what-it-means-for-the-java-ee-ecosystem

 

Michael Akerman

Project/Program Specialist

IT Services

University of Arkansas

 

From: Reza Rahman [mailto:reza_...@lycos.com]

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:31 PM
To: jug-l...@jugs.java.net
Cc: adopt...@googlegroups.com

[Rahman USTA]

Wow, it works with JDK-8U131 and the latest Glassfish source.

[Zeeshan Haider]

Hi

I am newbie(JSP Associate) looking forward to adopt and contribute JSR 372.

Anyone can guide me through?

Regards,

Zeeshan

[reza_rahman]

Can you please let me know off list what of some of the activities I outlined interest you? I can help connect you to the right folks after that.

-------- Original message --------

From: Zeeshan Haider <zie...@gmail.com>

Date: 4/23/17 12:44 PM (GMT-05:00)

To: jug-l...@jugs.java.net

Cc: adopt...@googlegroups.com

Subject: [jug-leaders] Re: Servlet 4 Public Review, Adopt-a-JSR and You

[reza_rahman]

From what I understand, this is an issue with Chrome and Flash support that's being worked on. Please try another browser?

-------- Original message --------

From: Michael Akerman <mi...@uark.edu>

Date: 4/21/17 2:51 PM (GMT-05:00)

To: jug-l...@jugs.java.net

Cc: adopt...@googlegroups.com

Subject: [jug-leaders] Re: Servlet 4 Public Review, Adopt-a-JSR and You

I'm getting "Cannot load M3U8: Crossdomain access denied" when trying to watch the linked screencast.

 

http://www.captechconsulting.com/videos/http2-and-what-it-means-for-the-java-ee-ecosystem

 

Michael Akerman

Project/Program Specialist

IT Services

University of Arkansas

 

From: Reza Rahman [mailto:reza_...@lycos.com]

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:31 PM

To: jug-l...@jugs.java.net
Cc: adopt...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jug-leaders] Re: Servlet 4 Public Review, Adopt-a-JSR and You

 

I have not tested it myself, but according to Ed Burns' post, it is.

On Apr 21, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Rahman USTA <rahman....@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Reza,

 

Is the reference implementation is ready for testing Servlet 4 ? especially the Push API?

 

Thanks.

2017-04-21 21:06 GMT+03:00 Reza Rahman <reza_...@lycos.com>:

Folks,

In case you missed it, Servlet 4 just released it's public review (this is the last review before the specification becomes proposed final). Feel free to take a look at my write-up on the topic here: http://blog.rahmannet.net/2017/04/servlet-4-public-review-starts-now.html. This is a great time to engage with this JSR via Adopt-a-JSR. Servlet 4 is easily the most critical component of Java EE 8. It is very well deserving in terms of support from JUGs for that reason alone. If you are interested, you should start a discussion in the copied Google Group.

The Philly JUG has long adopted this particular JSR in addition to Java EE 8, Java EE Security and Java SE 9.

If you have any questions on any of this I am happy to try to help the best I can, including connecting you to the right folks.

Cheers,
Reza

 

--

[Zeeshan Haider]

Probably helping with JIRA hygiene and serialVersionUID cleanup