Centroids:
Nothing puts on display one form of generation gap than this WSJ article about
millennials and therapy. And not just millennials or Gen Xers, It also puts on display
a certain kind of tone deafness in which the affluent assume that everyone else
has their values and the financial means to indulge their every whim.
It isn't that I have some kind of animus against psychotherapy. The opposite is true.
Therapy has the potential to be very useful. But something is terribly wrong
when what this is, is one more example of nose-in-the-air elitism.
You know, "I just spent $500 on therapy sessions, how about you?"
"Well, I can't afford $50 to fix my bicycle, let alone spend a fortune to see a head shrinker."
"What fortune? Everyone I know spends hundreds of dollars on therapists, and
even their kids see therapists."
"Yeah? Some of the people I know can't afford to make it through the month
buying the groceries they need."
"You've got to be kidding. How do they afford the meager $200 monthly for their
$ 1000 cell phones?"
My inner tendency is to want to say to someone like that, "go f**k yourself."
When you are at the bottom of the economic totem pole you are thankful for the equivalent
of socialized medicine. And the last thing I would ever do, anyway, is brag about
medical care, viz, about surgery or anything else. If I did, and this was some other
country, say Honduras or Angola, what would that say about me? Someone from
a low-standard-of-living nation would resent what I take for granted. He or she
cannot possibly afford an angiogram or colonoscopy.
Then there is the factor of Silicon Valley Christianity, Re: Hedge Fund Christianity
or Oil Boom Christianity, Christianity of the affluent. Such people don't live
on the same planet as 90% of everyone else. And it shows in the assumptions
they make. Indeed, for all their protestations of Christian faith, what I hear
is blatant self indulgence, or s'il vous plait, " snotty elitist libertarian Christianity."
Or maybe not libertarian, it could even be a form of RC.
Kind of like the upper crust Christianity of many Episcopalians of 50 years ago
only this time around it is a form of Evangelical Christianity. Just as snotty
even if the theology is different. And guaranteed to generate the same kind
of serious deep resentment.
This said, what about the value of psychotherapy? Sure, but make it available to
everyone who needs it, not just the socio-economic elite. Hence in a new kind of church
training for pastors that gives them psychotherapy skills. A new kind of church,
a new kind of Christianity, not just a new kind of building or a new kind of worship service.
One in which, for all the wealth anyone may have, there is no possibility of unconscious
class bias, no possibility of unconscious self-indulgence.
You know what all kinds of talk about "humility" sounds like when it comes from
someone earning $100,000 ? Lets spell the word a little differently, same "h"
first letter, but after that the letters are "y p o c r i s y."
If you want to know.
Billy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
You have a good point about the quasi-elitist nature of psychotherapy Billy. It is out of reach for most of the non-affluent. An exception is services for some very-in-need-of-services people who neglect or abuse their kids, and others with egregious behaviors. Then, the State might step in and provide services; or for a serious swath of the badly mentally ill, put them in prison.
I think is interesting, as the article points out, that the one-time stigma about therapy has mostly gone away. That is a good thing for those who truly need therapy, but your point is well-taken.
Chris
--
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <Radical...@googlegroups.com>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to RadicalCentri...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Chris:
A long time ago, in Kentucky at Alice Lloyd College, I was selected for a
training program to become a group facilitator. This was the era of
the "transparent self," of self-actualization, and of such things as gestalt therapy.
The objective was to train content specialist teachers to become able to
effectively deal with at least some of the psychological issues that students
from lower economic class families bring with them to college.
Very valuable program. Probably there should have been more training than
what the program provided, which consisted of meetings and training sessions
about once per month over a year, but at least I had a decent idea of what
this was all about and could then think about making such a program better.
None of the 18- 25 year olds I taught came from families who earned more
that maybe $15,000 in today's money. Well, maybe there were a few,
but by and large this was the picture.
All of which helped me see my own biases and assumptions. Far from perfectly,
as you know all too well, but at least to some extent, and every bit helps.
That's the trick, seeing your own limitations.
This ties in with the SBC a few years ago, with their grand public position
about asking black people to forgive them of their past racism. One article
I read at the time pointed out that most black people were not impressed.
After all, what good did that do? The black people were still mired in poverty,
their kids still mostly had sub-standard educations, and there were hardly any
black people in the SBC since it existed in a predominantly white universe.
Points well taken, it seems. The SBC did far more than pray about the situation.
They got busy and actually did some things, to the extent that the SBC a few years
after that, had a black president.
To be sure, that didn't solve all the problems of the SBC, which is now losing
a lot of members. But, so I believe, if they did something else, whatever it may be,
they just might have a chance -because the race issue is now pretty much gone.
It doesn't get in the way of what is needed next.
Billy,
I didn’t know that the SBC had a black president and I think it is interesting that you think the race issue has mostly gone away in the group. I was completely blindsided by the racism that was lurking in America out of my sight, or maybe my willingness to see. Trump’s rallies shattered my notion that racism had ebbed to fringe groups.
Chris:
I can't say whether racism has increased among fringe groups on the Right.
Maybe it has, which would be bad news. But my point was simply that
the SBC seems to have learned its lesson and has become more responsible.
So, other groups should be able to do likewise.
The thing about Right-wing racism is that Trump is the kind of character that he is.
Off the wall, or all over the map, choose your preferred metaphor. This allows
Rightist crazies to project their ideals onto him. It also allows Leftist crazies
to project their worst fears onto him. And it allows the media to pick what
they want to pick, so that they can puff news viewership or readership to get
higher circulation numbers.
About racism per se, my biggest concern is rising reverse racism, viz, black people
blaming white males for all the problems of black people, like black incarcerations.
About which I take a very dim view. Because this means more of the same crap,
black irresponsibility, unwillingness to own the fact that there is a helluva lot
of crime committed by black people, mostly black males in their teens up to
their thirties. Hence also there are big stinks about such incidents as Ferguson, Missouri,
which, it turns out, was not a case of police bias in operation but one more example
of a young punk black male "doing his thing" and committing a crime.
But so what? The media narrative -black people and white Leftists with their hands in the air,
supposedly emulating the black supposedly innocent man trying to surrender before
he was shot. Trouble is, that never happened. The whole story was a myth. Also so what?
The myth is as good as gold on the Left and in the "mainstream" media.
So, older white males get blamed for everything even though -by far- most of the problems
arise among the non-white population of the inner cities, mostly black people
and Hispanics. Can't understand why I would be unhappy?
Skin pigmentation has nothing to do with any of this, of course. After all, when was
the last time you heard about the high crime rate among Hindus in America?
But maybe most of the motel owners in Eugene (they aren't all from India
but it may seem that way) are secretly shooting people after dark and
the cops don't report it. Ya never know.......
Billy
Billy,
I don’t think that racism among fringe groups has increased. I, Pollyannaishly, like to think that it has decreased, which is the point I was trying to make. The growth of in-your-face racism in the Trump era made me aware that the underlying relaxation in racial tension was a figment of my imagination.