I'm working on a grant proposal now to develop a public library ARG targeted as a summer program for teens. Part of what they will do is observe and document what goes on in the library, with a focus on a different section during each module of the game.
We are debating if the modules should run over one or two weeks (or have both in the design, so libraries could pick). The ARG is designed around a weekly 2-hour program that would run for about 6 weeks.
So, which schedule is preferable / possible?
One week per module:
- Players get their missions. While they are still there or sometime during the next week, the players document library use. They report about this online, and get the results at the next week's meeting.
Two weeks per module:
- Week One: Players get their missions.
- Week Two: Players observe the library and develop their reports.
Is it reasonable that players can have an assignment in the library that they would come back to the library and work on before the next session or do we need to plan it around players only coming to the library once a week for the program?
Thanks,
Scott