In the last month and a half, on three separate occasions, I also had a stranger come to my door and ask to come in to see and discuss our energy bills. I say no. But practically not a day goes by without a telemarketing call — sometimes several a day — urging us to accept some kind of offer with respect to energy.
The truth of the matter is that it is the state legislature that has created conditions for the predatory practices that we are witnessing.
We are being bombarded with all this direct marketing by energy companies because this is what the industry lobbyists managed to get Beacon Hill to allow. Deregulation is something that business-friendly Republicans usually favor. It is almost always for the benefit of the deregulated industry — but it makes things much harder for the consumers.
So I wonder why the supposedly “blue” Massachusetts legislature thought it was the right thing to unleash this big headache on people of having to research, discuss, and make complex and difficult choices about energy sources? Like life is not short enough.
Most people — practically everyone, on every economic level — are simply too preoccupied with their lives to be able to educate themselves about complex offers, figure out differences between various deals that are hiding in the fine print, compare prices, and pick individual contracts that only last for a certain amount of time (the so-called “teasers”) before they revert to higher rates.
Also, the phone solicitations are infuriating — you drop whatever you’re doing to answer the phone, only to find out that someone is trying to sell you something (in this case energy) on your own phone line that you pay for, and these people hijack in order to finagle money from you. It eventually forces you to stop answering the phone, meaning that your friends and family that you do want to hear from can’t get through to you on the first or second try.
Consumer protection activists in Massachusetts are probably overwhelmed, and may have been unable to prevent the legislation that made this whole energy deregulation thing possible (or to make sure that it would be structured better). But forget consumer activists. The legislators represent the people, and they should have known that most people would greatly prefer for the state regulators who oversee public utilities to strike the best deal for Massachusetts consumers — and spare millions of individuals the pain of having to study and choose different energy suppliers.
Or at least the choices should have been made very simple and straightforward (standardized forms that make comparing terms and rates easy; no different fine print from each company) — and be posted on a state-sponsored website, as the only place where people could sign up. The tiresome direct marketing to individual households should have been prohibited/eliminated.