completely fucked
§ñühw¤£f
if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went to GRC and did the
test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How fucked up is that?
--
http://www.care2.com/click-to-donate/wolves/
Proof of Americas 3rd world status:
http://www.ramusa.org/
Cash for *who*?
http://www.bartcop.com/list-the-facts.htm
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/
Rôgêr
> My ispee centurytel blocks AT THE SERVER port 9000. So no torrents. I wondered
> if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went to GRC and did the
> test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How fucked up is that?
Write to Sen. John McCain and tell him you support his proposal to allow
the big ISPs to control ALL internet traffic. Paradoxically called the
Internet Freedom Act, meant to cripple the efforts of the net neutrality
movement which seeks to disallow ISPs from doing exactly what you
describe, plus slowing down traffic to websites that aren't in the ISPs
financial best interests.
Penn...@derrymaine.gov
>My ispee centurytel blocks AT THE SERVER port 9000. So no torrents. I wondered
>if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went to GRC and did the
>test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How fucked up is that?
Call up and complain, I did, it worked. (this was with the P.O.S
Wireways). I had a program running that while harmless to the server
was seen as a P2P program (Xfire).
Get your speed and just have a shopping list.
and again - Encryption of the packets.
--
You've got three months to grab what you need.
http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-ordered-to-delete-torrents-091022/
And
http://gizmodo.com/5387909/hulus-glorious-free-days-are-officially-numbered
Rôgêr
> R�g�r wrote:
>
>> Write to Sen. John McCain and tell him you support his proposal to allow
>> the big ISPs to control ALL internet traffic. Paradoxically called the
>> Internet Freedom Act, meant to cripple the efforts of the net neutrality
>> movement which seeks to disallow ISPs from doing exactly what you
>> describe, plus slowing down traffic to websites that aren't in the ISPs
>> financial best interests.
>
> pieces of dogshit that they are. The party of NO, soon to be the party of
> NOBODY.
That's the presidential candidate that admitted last year he had to have
his wife help him with email, now proposes legislation that will affect
all of America's access to anything and everything on the internet. Want
to take a wild guess at who is among his biggest contributors?
�n�hw��f
news:V9SdnTduE8V_snXX...@pghconnect.com:
Its no guess, baby torrl :)
McSame took a bpatload of cash from the telcos...
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
�n�hw��f
news:3864cc....@news.alt.net:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:03:48 -0700, ???hw??f
> <snuh...@netscape.net>wrote:
>
>>My ispee centurytel blocks AT THE SERVER port 9000. So no torrents.
>>I wondered if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went
>>to GRC and did the test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How
>>fucked up is that?
>
> Guess they (centel) don't have the bandwidth to support the largest
> amount of traffic on the net, P2P ..
>
ITS FOR TEH PROTECHSHUN OF TEH USERS!!!!!!!!!1111111111111!!!!!!!!!
And kissing ass to the movie,music, etc industry.
�n�hw��f
news:4usfe5111mrvgka1m...@4ax.com:
> ���hw��f <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>My ispee centurytel blocks AT THE SERVER port 9000. So no torrents.
>>I wondered if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went
>>to GRC and did the test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How
>>fucked up is that?
>
> Call up and complain, I did, it worked. (this was with the P.O.S
> Wireways). I had a program running that while harmless to the server
> was seen as a P2P program (Xfire).
>
> Get your speed and just have a shopping list.
>
> and again - Encryption of the packets.
Encryption wont work if ports are blocked by default?
§ñühw¤£f
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:12:34 -0500, "?n?hw??f"
> <snuh...@netscape.net>wrote:
>
> >Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> pinched out a steaming pile of
> >news:3864cc....@news.alt.net:
> >
> >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:03:48 -0700, ???hw??f
> >> <snuh...@netscape.net>wrote:
> >>
> >>>My ispee centurytel blocks AT THE SERVER port 9000. So no torrents.
> >>>I wondered if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went
> >>>to GRC and did the test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How
> >>>fucked up is that?
> >>
> >> Guess they (centel) don't have the bandwidth to support the largest
> >> amount of traffic on the net, P2P ..
> >>
> >ITS FOR TEH PROTECHSHUN OF TEH USERS!!!!!!!!!1111111111111!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >And kissing ass to the movie,music, etc industry.
>
>
> Can't blame them, P2P has all but ruined RIAA and could do the same
> for MPAA.
>
> I wouldn't like spending millions on a movie only to see an unfinished
> version being passed around. Nor would I like spending months in the
> studio pounding out my heart and soul on an album then financing the
> release only to see it being passed around for free.
Agreed. Ive never had limewire, kazaa, napster, Emule, Gnutella,BearShare etc
on my computers.
Streaming audio means you never have to save anything. Shoutcast is where its
at.
nobody >
> R�g�r wrote:
>
>> the big ISPs to control ALL internet traffic. Paradoxically called the
>> Internet Freedom Act, meant to cripple the efforts of the net neutrality
>> movement which seeks to disallow ISPs from doing exactly what you
>> describe, plus slowing down traffic to websites that aren't in the ISPs
>> financial best interests.
>
> pieces of dogshit that they are. The party of NO, soon to be the party of
> NOBODY.
>
Don't try to pin that on me...
�n�hw��f
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:49:12 -0700, ???hw??f
> <snuh...@netscape.net>wrote:
> And port 8000 is where it's at.
>
Not for torrents. AFAIK, thats 9000. At least thats the default port in
'Transmission'...which runs on *nix,mac,BeOS.
And thats totally blocked.
Oh well, fuck it.
^_^
�n�hw��f
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:18:09 -0500, "?n?hw??f"
> Oh, were back on subject. It depends on the tracker as to what port
> they use to communicate with your client. Once that's established
> you can pick any range of ports to communicate back and forth with
> the peer hive.
>
Obviously I need to read *all* the documentation on the torrent wiki...
NP: Frank Zappa 'Yo Mama'
§ñühw¤£f
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:48:39 -0500, "?n?hw??f"
> ban you if you do. (private trackers or the warez variety). They also
> usually require a ratio of your outgoing bandwidth to 'seed' back the
> torrent. When you meet the ratio quota you can download more. Some
> private trackers even offer a way to buy quota 'points' instead of
> seeding for them.
>
> Can't speak for other public trackers but most operate within those
> parameters to varying degrees.
>
>
Well I signed up for the Transmission forum so maybe I can figure out how to
use a simple app by reading there.
^_^
�n�hw��f
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:45:42 -0700, ???hw??f
> meat jr has been using a torrent client for a couple years now.
> Myself I used to belong to a private tracker. And that tracker would
> only allow certain builds and brands of clients. I had to
> download/compile/make a build of Ktorrent not available
> pre-packaged.
>
Apparently you can get "good karma" if you let the app seed for a while
after youve downloaded your file.
Interesting. Rewarding co=operation and punishing selfishness.
§ñühw¤£f
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:48:38 -0500, "?n?hw??f"
> Most of the time leechers are banned unless you somehow pay to leech.
> One way is seeding, the other is paying the tracker for leeching
> points via paypal. Most don't allow uploading new torrents unless
> you've 'proven' yourself.
Malware being a big issue on the file sharing internets.
Current article on /. about some dipshit gubmint helper that lost some
documents to a p2p situation. Guess he didnt know how to SHARE ONLY ONE FOLDER.
Aardvark
Sounds a bit goddamned socialist, if you ask me. I'll bet that obammy guy
does that sorta thing.
--
Elmo McElroy: If I wanted cuisine, I'd have gone to Paris
Felix DeSouza: You can still go to France. It's full of pricks. They hate
Yanks too. Do you fancy a bite, or what?
Elmo Mc Elroy: Yeah, all right.
�n�hw��f
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:49:11 -0700, ???hw??f
> With a torrent you don't have any shared folders. You do have a
> range of ports that your client broadcasts as to the availability
> for peer connections. Depending on the popularity of what you're
> seeding you could have upwards of a hundred of so connections each
> eating a specific slice of the pie. So can some acne faced,
> nosring-boi upload an OMGZ! to yer torrent folder? Not hardly.
> Prolly easier using an instant messenger or some other p2p that
> doesn't structure connections like torrent does.
>
Interesting. From what Ive read its the '*.torrent' file that announces
the availability of the actual file thats shared. I tried looking at a
*.torrent file with a text editor but it didnt reveal much...
�n�hw��f
news:S%4Hm.23525$nI....@newsfe14.ams2:
Intellectual Property is a deep subject, fer sure.
NormanM
> My ispee centurytel blocks AT THE SERVER port 9000. So no torrents. I wondered
> if its the modem/router so I disabled the firewall. Went to GRC and did the
> test. Made no fucking diff. Same results. How fucked up is that?
Unless they host that server, they can't block it at that server.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
NormanM
> Not for torrents. AFAIK, thats 9000. At least thats the default port in
> 'Transmission'...which runs on *nix,mac,BeOS.
Interestin. That is not the "torrent port". Default is, I think 6190, or the
like. But my client allows a custom configuration, and I have it at 18679,
or something around there.
> And thats totally blocked.
But not "at the server", unless the server is hosted by the blocking ISP.
§ñühw¤£f
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:18:09 -0500, �n�hw��f wrote:
>
> > Not for torrents. AFAIK, thats 9000. At least thats the default port in
> > 'Transmission'...which runs on *nix,mac,BeOS.
>
> Interestin. That is not the "torrent port". Default is, I think 6190, or the
> like. But my client allows a custom configuration, and I have it at 18679,
> or something around there.
>
Netstat showed a lot of interesting ports connected.
> > And thats totally blocked.
>
> But not "at the server", unless the server is hosted by the blocking ISP.
>
It wasnt.
§ñühw¤£f
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:57:42 -0600, "?n?hw??f"
> control of the torrent. I suppose there are variants like a
> tracker-less torrent or others. Wiki it and do some reading.
Yeah. I completed my task. Next time I wanna do som light reading I'll
go on the transmission forum and look at the readmees.