Al Gore unavailable for comment.
Bullwinkle
(Telegraph) - Himalayan glaciers are actually advancing rather than
retreating, claims the first major study since a controversial UN report
said they would be melted within quarter of a century.
Researchers have discovered that contrary to popular belief half of the
ice flows in the Karakoram range of the mountains are actually growing
rather than shrinking.
The discovery adds a new twist to the row over whether global warming is
causing the world's highest mountain range to lose its ice cover.
It further challenges claims made in a 2007 report by the UN's
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the glaciers would be gone by
2035.
Although the head of the panel Dr Rajendra Pachauri later admitted the
claim was an error gleaned from unchecked research, he maintained that
global warming was melting the glaciers at "a rapid rate", threatening
floods throughout north India.
The new study by scientists at the Universities of California and Potsdam
has found that half of the glaciers in the Karakoram range, in the
northwestern Himlaya, are in fact advancing and that global warming is not
the deciding factor in whether a glacier survives or melts.
Ferd Berfle
"Bullwinkle" <BD...@loa.mo> wrote in message
news:4d42...@news.x-privat.org...
Maybe that's why Swivel Head didn't whine about "climate change" during his
State of Confusion Screech?
LSMFT
Oh, global warming gives you colder weather and more glaciers; just ask Al.
--
LSMFT
Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
§nühw¤£f
>[redacted ]
Listen fuckchop, unless you give CITE to a reliable source it aint shit.
http://news.discovery.com/earth/himalayas-glaciers-shrink.html
Throughout much of the Tibetan Plateau, high-altitude glaciers are
dwindling in the face of rising temperatures. The situation is
potentially
dire for the hundreds of millions of people living in China, India and
throughout southeast Asia who depend on the glaciers for their water
supply.
But in the rugged western corner of the plateau, the story is different,
according to a new study. Among legendary peaks of Mt. Everest like
K2 and Nanga Parbat, glaciers with a penthouse view of the world are
growing, and have been for almost three decades.
"These are the biggest mid-latitude glaciers in the world," John Shroder
of the University of Nebraska-Omaha said. "And all of them are
either holding still, or advancing."
When Shroder and a team of researchers examined satellite imagery of the
region's glaciers dating back to 1960, they found that 87
glaciers had surged forward during that time, sliding down into lower
elevations. An analysis of gravity signatures in the region also
suggests the glaciers are growing in mass, and have been since at least
1980.
The team's work will be published in a forthcoming issue of Annals of
Glaciology.
Surging glaciers are common and do not necessarily mean a glacier is
growing in overall size. But the fact that dozens of them have all
surged in the same region hints that larger climate forces are at work.
"It looks like it's the Westerlies," Shroder said, referring to strong
jets of wind that pour from west to east in a belt around the planet.
Though
he can't say for certain, the winds appear to be carrying more moisture
from the warming Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea eastward.
If that's true, some of the moisture would fall into the region around
the Caspian Sea. But as the winds rise into Karakoram's frigid heights,
any remaining water would come down as snow, feeding the glaciers.
"We will see regional patterns like this developing as climate change
alters precipitation," said Andrew Fountain of Portland State University
in Oregon.
Fountain said that similar trends were evident in some Scandinavian
glaciers during the 1990s, which benefited from increased storminess
and precipitation coming off the North Atlantic Ocean. Researchers have
also found that glaciers on California's Mt. Shasta have been
growing for decades. And glacier recession has been blunted in the
mountains of Oregon and Washington state because of increased
moisture from the warming Pacific Ocean.
In the Karakorams, the uptick in glacier mass has come with a welcomed
perk. The mighty Indus River, which flows out of China and
nourishes northern India and much of Pakistan has experienced an
increase in discharge.
But it's not likely to last.
"As temperatures continue increasing, they will overtake additional mass
provided by snow," Fountain said. "The freezing level will keep
rising, and glaciers will melt."
--
http://savewikileaks.net/another-wikileaks-address/
http://video.rutube.ru/86a89775776433978a1ef4a83538899b
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
Meat Plow
> Bullwinkle wrote:
>>[redacted ]
Contextomy, enter the Straw Man.
> Listen fuckchop, unless you give CITE to a reliable source it aint shit.
>
> http://news.discovery.com/earth/himalayas-glaciers-shrink.html
========================================================================
From your link:
HIMALAYAN GLACIERS SEEM TO BE GROWING
In the Western Himalayas, a group of some 230 glaciers are bucking the
global warming trend.
=========================================================================
You left this out of your quote even though is was the start of the story:
Perched on the soaring Karakoram mountains in the Western Himalayas, a
group of some 230 glaciers are bucking the global warming trend. They're
growing.
==========================================================================
This is otherwise known as Quote Mining. :)
Choose a game you are better educated in playing.
HTH
--
Live Fast, Die Young and Leave a Pretty Corpse
§nühw¤£f
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:40 -0700, �n�hw��f wrote:
>
>> Bullwinkle wrote:
>>>[redacted ]
> Contextomy, enter the Straw Man.
>
>> Listen fuckchop, unless you give CITE to a reliable source it aint
> shit.
>>
>> http://news.discovery.com/earth/himalayas-glaciers-shrink.html
> ======================================================================
> ==
> From your link:
>
> HIMALAYAN GLACIERS SEEM TO BE GROWING
> In the Western Himalayas, a group of some 230 glaciers are bucking the
> global warming trend.
>
> ======================================================================
> ===
>
If you dont like my poasts, use a kilfile.
Of all people, you're the last one I'd expect to whine about my hobby.
^_^
philo
> Al Gore unavailable for comment.
>
>
<snip>
worse still
the glaciers were also unavailable for comment
Meat Plow
> Meat Plow wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:40 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>
>>> Bullwinkle wrote:
>>>>[redacted ]
>> Contextomy, enter the Straw Man.
>>
>>> Listen fuckchop, unless you give CITE to a reliable source it aint
>> shit.
>>>
>>> http://news.discovery.com/earth/himalayas-glaciers-shrink.html
>> ======================================================================
>> ==
>> From your link:
>>
>> HIMALAYAN GLACIERS SEEM TO BE GROWING In the Western Himalayas, a group
>> of some 230 glaciers are bucking the global warming trend.
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> ===
>>
>> You left this out of your quo<SLAP>
>
> If you dont like my poasts, use a kilfile.
I love your posts. I just want you to understand how easily they can be
boot-fucked when you send out straw men to post them for you :)
Buffalo
You're wasting your time trying to tell the Moose anything. He/She/It
doesn't have much common sense and doesn't seem to be able to interpret or
understand what is written.
Buffalo
G. Morgan
>You're wasting your time trying to tell the Moose anything. He/She/It
>doesn't have much common sense and doesn't seem to be able to interpret or
>understand what is written.
>Buffalo
You're just jealous because the moose has a bigger "rack". ;-)
§nühw¤£f
duce:
many levels.
:(
--
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.mediamatters.org
§nühw¤£f
http://mediamatters.org/research/201101280011
Wash. Times Misrepresents Glacier Study To Attack Global Warming
Science
January 28, 2011 10:56 am ET 76 Comments
The Washington Times attacked global warming science by citing a recent study
that showed some Himalayan glaciers are stable
or expanding. But the study did not cast doubt on global warming, as the
study's lead author noted, "Overall in the Himalayas, the
glaciers are retreating," while the ones that weren't were protected by a
shield of debris; additionally, other studies have showed that
glaciers are melting all over the world.
Wash. Times Cites Recent Himalayan Glacier Study To Attack Global Warming
Science
Wash. Times Cites Recent Study To Attack Global Warming Science, Claim That
Glaciers "Stubbornly Refuse To Melt On Cue."
In a January 27 editorial, titled, "Snow Job," The Washington Times attacked
the "false prophets of the global-warming movement"
and cited a recent study in the journal Nature Geoscience to claim that
glaciers "stubbornly refuse to melt on cue." From the Times
editorial:
No matter how many times nature is proved more powerful than man, false
prophets of the global-warming movement
continue to insist that mankind can control the weather through tax policy.
[...]
The glaciers, however, stubbornly refuse to melt on cue. On Sunday, a detailed
study of that region's glaciers was
published online by the journal Nature Geoscience. Using high-resolution
satellite imagery, the researchers demonstrated
that although some glaciers were indeed melting, the majority of the others in
the northwestern Himalaya were either
advancing or stable. "Our study shows that there is no uniform response of
Himalayan glaciers to climate change," they
concluded. Neither over-salted roads nor carbon credits can overcome the
natural cycles of the weather. [The
Washington Times, 1/27/11]
But Study's Lead Author Stated That "Overall In The Himalayas, The Glaciers Are
Retreating"
Study's Lead Author: "Overall In The Himalayas, The Glaciers Are Retreating."
On January 23, Reuters reported on the recent
Himalayan glacier study and noted, "Some Himalayan glaciers are advancing
despite an overall retreat." The article reported that the
study found "[a] blanket of dust and rock debris was apparently shielding some
glaciers in the world's highest mountain range from a
thaw" and that the study's lead author, Dirk Scherler of the University of
Potsdam in Germany, stated, "Overall in the Himalayas, the
glaciers are retreating." From Reuters:
Some Himalayan glaciers are advancing despite an overall retreat, according to
a study on Sunday that is a step toward
understanding how climate change affects vital river flows from China to India.
A blanket of dust and rock debris was apparently shielding some glaciers in the
world's highest mountain range from a
thaw, a factor omitted from past global warming reports. And varying wind
patterns might explain why some were
defying a melt.
"Our study shows there is no uniform response of Himalayan glaciers to climate
change and highlights the importance of
debris cover," scientists at universities in Germany and the United States
wrote in the study of 286 glaciers.
The findings underscore that experts in the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) were wrong to say
in a 2007 report that Himalayan glaciers could vanish by 2035 in a headlong
thaw. The panel corrected the error in 2010.
[...]
Elsewhere in the Himalayas "more than 65 percent of the monsoon-influenced
glaciers ... are retreating," they wrote in the
journal Nature Geoscience of the satellite study from 2000 to 2008. Some
glaciers that were stable in length were
covered by a thick layer of rocky debris.
"Overall in the Himalayas, the glaciers are retreating," Dirk Scherler, the
lead author at the University of Potsdam in
Germany, told Reuters. [Reuters, 1/23/11]
Telegraph: "Climate Sceptics" Will Seize On Himalayan Study "As Providing
Dramatic Evidence That Global Warming Is Not
Taking Place. But It Does No Such Thing." In a January 27 post, Geoffrey Lean,
the U.K. Telegraph's environmental editor, wrote
that "climate sceptics are bound to seize on today's news that more than half
the glaciers in the Karakoram mountains in the west of
the world's highest chain are either stable or actually advancing as providing
dramatic evidence that global warming is not taking
place. But it does no such thing." Lean continued:
For a start, the study that made the discovery concluded - as lead researcher
Dirk Scherler put it that - "overall in the
Himalayas, the glaciers are retreating". What made the difference in the
Karakoram was that many are covered in a
layer of rubble that has eroded from the peaks, insulating the ice from the
warmth of the sun. Where this layer was
present the glaciers did not melt or even grew; where it was not the rate of
retreat remained high.
Elsewhere in the world the retreat continues. Just last weekend, for example,
it was announced that Greeenland's
icesheet melted at a record rate in 2010 and studies show that most of the
world's glaciers are shrinking.
Many of the smaller ones are expected to disappear this century. The World
Glacier Monitoring Service calculates, for
example, that the Alps will lose about 70 per cent of its glaciers by 2050,
while the Pyrenees may go completely ice-
free. The bigger, higher glaciers of the Himalayas, another study concluded
this month, may shrink by about 10 per cent
by 2100. That is a very long way from the apocalyptic projection in the IPCC
report, but also equally far from justifying
claims that global warming is not taking place. [Telegraph, 1/27/11]
Wash. Times Uses Erroneous Himalayan Glacier Statement In IPCC Report To Attack
Global Warming Science
Wash. Times Cites Erroneous 2007 IPCC Report Claim On Himalayan Glaciers To
Attack "Pseudo-Scientific Doomsayers" At
IPCC. From the Times editorial:
No matter how many times nature is proved more powerful than man, false
prophets of the global-warming movement
continue to insist that mankind can control the weather through tax policy. The
pseudo-scientific doomsayers at the United
Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have stuck to their
story that global warming is real, despite
numerous flaws uncovered in the group's research. One of the most embarrassing
of these revelations was the sourcing
of the 2007 IPCC report claim that the Himalayan glaciers were melting. The
idea that these imposing blocks of ice
would completely disappear by the year 2035 fed a breathless media hysteria
preaching impending doom. It turns out
this conclusion was based not on a peer-reviewed study but on a press release
by the WWF, a left-wing activist group.
Nonetheless, the IPCC reaffirmed its commitment to the melting story last
January as "robust, appropriate and entirely
consistent with the underlying science." [The Washington Times, 1/27/11]
IPCC Himalayan Glacier Error Does Not Undermine Evidence Of Global Warming;
Studies Show Glaciers Rapidly Melting Worldwide
Despite IPCC Error On Himalayan Glaciers, Studies Show That Glaciers Are
Melting All Over The World. In January 2010, the
IPCC acknowledged and apologized for erroneously citing claims that Himalayan
glaciers would melt by 2035. However, the IPCC
report highlights legitimate scientific studies showing that glaciers worldwide
are melting. [IPCC, 1/20/10]
Studies Show The World's Glaciers Are Melting Rapidly. The World Glacier
Monitoring Service (WGMS) issued a report in March
2008 showing that, according to a United Nations Environment Program press
release, for 30 of the world's glaciers, "the average
rate of melting and thinning more than doubled" in a year's time. WGMS later
updated its data for 2007-08 and said that the "new data
continues the global trend in strong ice loss over the past few decades."
Moreover, scientists at the ETH Zurich university reportedly
issued a study in 2009 showing that Swiss glaciers had retreated by 12 percent
over the past decade. [Media Matters, 4/6/10]
Greenland's Ice Sheet Melted At A Record Rate In 2010. Reuters reported on
January 21 that "Greenland's ice sheet melted at a
record rate in 2010." Reuters further reported that "[t]he ice in Greenland
melted so much last year that it formed rivers and lakes on
top of the vast series of glaciers that covers much of the big Arctic island,
with waterfalls flowing through cracks and holes toward the
bottom of the ice sheet." [Reuters, 1/21/11]
Glacier Experts Link Melting Glaciers To Global Warming. Glacier expert Michael
Zemp is quoted in a January 2010 CNN.com
article as saying, "Glaciers are the best proof that climate change is
happening. This is happening on a global scale. They can translate
very small changes in the climate into a visible signal." And a January 2010
Guardian article reported that "Lonnie Thompson, a
glaciologist at Ohio State University, said there is strong evidence from a
variety of sources of significant melting of glaciers -- from
the area around Kilimanjaro in Africa to the Alps, the Andes, and the icefields
of Antarctica because of a warming climate. Ice is also
disappearing at a faster rate in recent decades, he said." [CNN.com, 1/20/10;
Guardian, 1/20/10]
G. Morgan
>IF you're suggesting that "bullwinkle" is a chick...well thats just wrong on so
>many levels.
I'm not. Rack is also horns and antlers.
§nühw¤£f
It would explain his beligerance & abysmal stupidity.
<nods>
Meat Plow
> In message <pan.2011.01...@lmao.lol.lol>, Meat Plow dropped
> this duce:
>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:10:15 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>
>> > Meat Plow wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:53:40 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Bullwinkle wrote:
>> >>>>[redacted ]
>> >> Contextomy, enter the Straw Man.
>> >>
>> >>> Listen fuckchop, unless you give CITE to a reliable source it aint
>> >> shit.
>> >>>
>> >>> http://news.discovery.com/earth/himalayas-glaciers-shrink.html
>> >>
======================================================================
>> >> ==
>> >> From your link:
>> >>
>> >> HIMALAYAN GLACIERS SEEM TO BE GROWING In the Western Himalayas, a
>> >> group of some 230 glaciers are bucking the global warming trend.
>> >>
>> >>
======================================================================
>> >> ===
>> >>
>> >> You left this out of your quo<SLAP>
>> >
>> > If you dont like my poasts, use a kilfile.
>>
>> I love your posts. I just want you to understand how easily they can be
>> boot-fucked when you send out straw men to post them for you
>>
> Uh uh. Might wanna read moar be fore U jump 2 conclusions:
> http://mediamatters.org/research/201101280011
The point changed to your dancing straw man who I boot-fucked after you
brought him in. Get over it.
Save_for_l8r
LSMFT <bol...@aol.com> typed:
LSMFT?
"Lucky-Strike-Means-Fine-Tobacco"?
я黨wぃf
<pan.2011.01...@lmao.lol.lol>:
"With the aid of new remote-sensing methods and satellite images, we
identified debris coverage to be an important contributor to glacial
advance and retreat behaviors," said Bookhagen. "This parameter has
been almost completely neglected in previous Himalayan and other
mountainous region studies, although its impact has been known for some
time."
The finding is one more element in a worldwide political controversy
involving global warming. "Controversy about the current state and
future evolution of Himalayan glaciers has been stirred up by erroneous
reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),"
according to the paper.
"There is no ‘stereotypical' Himalayan glacier," said Bookhagen.
"This is in clear contrast to the IPCC reports that lumps all Himalayan
glaciers together."
http://www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/display.aspx?pkey=2406
Bookhagen noted that glaciers in the Karakoram region of Northwestern
Himalaya are mostly stagnating. However, glaciers in the Western,
Central, and Eastern Himalaya are retreating, with the highest retreat
rates –– approximately 8 meters per year –– in the Western
Himalayan Mountains. The authors found that half of the studied
glaciers in the Karakoram region are stable or advancing, whereas about
two-thirds are in retreat elsewhere throughout High Asia.
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
Save_for_l8r
Aardvark
>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.mediamatters.org
>
>
>
> Your link doesn't want to work, §nühw€£f.
>
Which one? They both work for me.
> John Doah
--
“Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, and socialism
without freedom is slavery and brutality.” -Mikhail Bakunin
Meat Plow
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
> "With the aid of new remote-sensing methods and satellite images, we
> identified debris coverage to be an important contributor to glacial
> advance and retreat behaviors," said Bookhagen. "This parameter has been
> almost completely neglected in previous Himalayan and other mountainous
> region studies, although its impact has been known for some time."
>
> The finding is one more element in a worldwide political controversy
> involving global warming. "Controversy about the current state and
> future evolution of Himalayan glaciers has been stirred up by erroneous
> reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),"
> according to the paper.
>
> "There is no ‘stereotypical' Himalayan glacier," said Bookhagen. "This
> is in clear contrast to the IPCC reports that lumps all Himalayan
> glaciers together."
> http://www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/display.aspx?pkey=2406
>
> Bookhagen noted that glaciers in the Karakoram region of Northwestern
> Himalaya are mostly stagnating. However, glaciers in the Western,
> Central, and Eastern Himalaya are retreating, with the highest retreat
> rates –– approximately 8 meters per year –– in the Western Himalayan
> Mountains. The authors found that half of the studied glaciers in the
> Karakoram region are stable or advancing, whereas about two-thirds are
> in retreat elsewhere throughout High Asia.
--
§nühw¤£f
I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
Save_for_l8r
"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:PM00049B1...@unknown.myhome.westell.com...
> Save_for_l8r wrote:
>>
>>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com
www.mediamatters.org
>>
>>
>>
>> Your link doesn't want to work, �n�hw��f.
>>
>> John Doah
>>
> Is it because its *two* links separated by a "pipe"?
> I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
That was it. I clicked on one link but they were two links, two links, two
links in one. :o)
Interesting art work. ;o)
John Doah
я黨wぃf
<ii4pn4$5pk$1...@news.eternal-september.org>:
>
>"§nühw¤Łf" <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote in message
>news:PM00049B1...@unknown.myhome.westell.com...
>> Save_for_l8r wrote:
>>>
>>>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com
>www.mediamatters.org
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your link doesn't want to work, §nühw¤Łf.
>>>
>>> John Doah
>>>
>> Is it because its *two* links separated by a "pipe"?
>> I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
>
>That was it. I clicked on one link but they were two links, two
links, two
>links in one. :o)
>
>Interesting art work. ;o)
>
>John Doah
>
indeed...i'm a big furry gay werewolf...who cares?
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
Bullwinkle
Do you feel better now?
Are you going to go enlist in the Army?
"���hw��f" <snuh...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote in message
news:201101310611.UTC.ii5jqn$bo9$1...@tioat.net...
Whiskers
> Save_for_l8r wrote:
>>
>>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.mediamatters.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> John Doah
>>
> Is it because its *two* links separated by a "pipe"?
> I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
That decision is up to the reader software, not the sender.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
§nühw¤£f
> Ah So, the truth will set you free.
>
> Do you feel better now?
>
The metamucil helps, thanks foar caring :)
> Are you going to go enlist in the Army?
>
You first.
Save_for_l8r
"§ñühw¤£f" <snuh...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote in message
news:201101310611.UTC.ii5jqn$bo9$1...@tioat.net...
> Save_for_l8r <nor...@forme.ever> pinched this steaming loaf
> <ii4pn4$5pk$1...@news.eternal-september.org>:
>
>>
>>news:PM00049B1...@unknown.myhome.westell.com...
>>> Save_for_l8r wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com
>>www.mediamatters.org
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John Doah
>>>>
>>> Is it because its *two* links separated by a "pipe"?
>>> I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
>>
>>That was it. I clicked on one link but they were two links, two
> links, two
>>links in one. :o)
>>
>>Interesting art work. ;o)
>>
>>John Doah
>>
> indeed...i'm a big furry gay werewolf...who cares?
Whatever flops your moth, Wolfman. I am impressed with your artistic talent!
John Doah
Bullwinkle
Your real daddy probably ran off in shame of you.
"§nühw¤Łf" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ii6lg5$94j$1...@news.datemas.de...
In message <4d46...@news.x-privat.org>, "Bullwinkle" dropped this duce:
> Are you going to go enlist in the Army?
>
You first.
§nühw¤£f
>
> "§ńühw¤Łf" <snuh...@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote in
> message
> news:201101310611.UTC.ii5jqn$bo9$1...@tioat.net...
>> Save_for_l8r <nor...@forme.ever> pinched this steaming loaf
>> <ii4pn4$5pk$1...@news.eternal-september.org>:
>>
>>>
>>>news:PM00049B1...@unknown.myhome.westell.com...
>>>> Save_for_l8r wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com
>>>www.mediamatters.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John Doah
>>>>>
>>>> Is it because its *two* links separated by a "pipe"?
>>>> I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
>>>
>>>That was it. I clicked on one link but they were two links, two
>> links, two
>>>links in one. :o)
>>>
>>>Interesting art work. ;o)
>>>
>>>John Doah
>>>
>> indeed...i'm a big furry gay werewolf...who cares?
>
> Whatever flops your moth, Wolfman. I am impressed with your artistic
> talent!
>
>
> John Doah
>
Hmmmmmmmmm...
--
http://savewikileaks.net/another-wikileaks-address/
http://video.rutube.ru/86a89775776433978a1ef4a83538899b
§nühw¤£f
> our real daddy ran off in shame.
>
No suprises there...
--
http://savewikileaks.net/another-wikileaks-address/
http://video.rutube.ru/86a89775776433978a1ef4a83538899b
Bullwinkle
Your real daddy probably ran off in shame of you.
"�n�hw��f" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Bullwinkle
"FromTheRafters" <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:20110131203922....@nomail.afraid.org...
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:47:50 -0800
ASCII <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
> Whiskers wrote:
> >On 2011-01-30, §nühw¤Łf <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >> Save_for_l8r wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.mediamatters.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Your link doesn't want to work, §nühw¤Łf.
> >>>
> >>> John Doah
> >>>
> >> Is it because its *two* links separated by a "pipe"?
> >> I didnt mean for them to be clickable URLS...
> >
> >That decision is up to the reader software, not the sender.
>
> Whichever side of the pipe I click
> takes me to that link,
> as if it were the only one.
Needs a little whitespace maybe?