Hash of virtualgl_2.6_amd64.deb changed, did was something change?

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Daniele

unread,
Apr 11, 2019, 2:46:28 PM4/11/19
to VirtualGL User Discussion/Support
Hi,

I have a Dockerfile that downloads virtualgl_2.6.deb and checks the hash for security. Recently, in the last 12 hrs, the file seems to have changed, is this intended? What are the changes?

Note: yes, I should probably change the Dockerfile to check signatures instead. For now, I did that manually and it's fine, so I'm just curious ...

Thanks!
Daniele

DRC

unread,
Apr 11, 2019, 3:42:37 PM4/11/19
to virtual...@googlegroups.com
New x86-64/amd64 packages for VGL 2.5.1 and later were uploaded last
night. Apparently the Docker image I had been using since 2016 to build
official VirtualGL binaries didn't have the x86-64 version of
libstdc++.a installed, so those binaries all depended on libstdc++.so.6
and were thus not cross-compatible (i.e. they probably only worked with
certain Linux flavors.) Other than changing the libstdc++ dependency to
static rather than dynamic, there should be no other differences in
these new packages.

Whenever I upload new binaries to correct problems such as this, I will
always update the README in the SourceForge files directory (e.g.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/virtualgl/files/2.6/) with information
about which packages were replaced, the date of replacement, and the
reason for it. All of our Linux packages are signed with GPG, also
(https://virtualgl.org/Downloads/DigitalSignatures).

DRC

Daniele

unread,
Apr 11, 2019, 3:45:34 PM4/11/19
to VirtualGL User Discussion/Support
Thank you for the explanation, and for the quick response, I missed that in the README!

--Daniele
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages