Thank you for the correction!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/vim/vim/commit/1ff3e701e49c04162c1bd68b58fb6588dda89fe0/170351599%40github.com.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
On Do, 13 Nov 2025, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> Patch 9.1.1905 ? I went over from Mercurial to git after patch 9.1.1896 plus two runtime changes, and "git status" never told me anything other than the following:
>
> On branch master
> Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'.
>
> nothing to commit, working tree clean
>
> so if there exists a patch 9.1.1905 I'm missing at least nine patchlevels. Where are they ?
If you don't want to change your current checked out repo, use git
fetch. This fetches the latest information from the remote repo, without
touching it. git status should then tell you, you are behind.
Since I seem to remember you have some local changes (I suppose commited
on top of the checkout master branch), you can then update your local
branch and re-apply your changes on top of it using
git rebase origin/master
Thanks,
Christian
--
It'll be a nice world if they ever get it finished.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()