Commit: patch 9.1.0082: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Christian Brabandt

unread,
Feb 8, 2024, 5:45:09 AM2/8/24
to vim...@googlegroups.com
patch 9.1.0082: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'

Commit: https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/7ce34c9a947b17a8b5e81e7c2335a63552182d10
Author: zeertzjq <zeer...@outlook.com>
Date: Thu Feb 8 11:34:55 2024 +0100

patch 9.1.0082: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'

Problem: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'.
Solution: Use smarter invalidation and adjustment. Remove unnecessary
UPD_VALID as it is already set at the top of the loop. Make
the test for #4862 fail without the fix.
(zeertzjq)

closes: #13986

Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeer...@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <c...@256bit.org>

diff --git a/src/change.c b/src/change.c
index c0b8785ba..0ea424f98 100644
--- a/src/change.c
+++ b/src/change.c
@@ -656,22 +656,20 @@ changed_common(
set_topline(wp, wp->w_topline);
#endif
// If lines have been added or removed, relative numbering always
- // requires a redraw.
+ // requires an update even if cursor didn't move.
if (wp->w_p_rnu && xtra != 0)
- {
wp->w_last_cursor_lnum_rnu = 0;
- redraw_win_later(wp, UPD_VALID);
- }
+
#ifdef FEAT_SYN_HL
- // Cursor line highlighting probably need to be updated with
- // "UPD_VALID" if it's below the change.
- // If the cursor line is inside the change we need to redraw more.
- if (wp->w_p_cul)
+ if (wp->w_p_cul && wp->w_last_cursorline >= lnum)
{
- if (xtra == 0)
- redraw_win_later(wp, UPD_VALID);
- else if (lnum <= wp->w_last_cursorline)
- redraw_win_later(wp, UPD_SOME_VALID);
+ if (wp->w_last_cursorline < lnume)
+ // If 'cursorline' was inside the change, it has already
+ // been invalidated in w_lines[] by the loop above.
+ wp->w_last_cursorline = 0;
+ else
+ // If 'cursorline' was below the change, adjust its lnum.
+ wp->w_last_cursorline += xtra;
}
#endif
}
diff --git a/src/testdir/test_highlight.vim b/src/testdir/test_highlight.vim
index b831878b4..d6c9f5005 100644
--- a/src/testdir/test_highlight.vim
+++ b/src/testdir/test_highlight.vim
@@ -557,22 +557,23 @@ func Test_cursorline_after_yank()
call StopVimInTerminal(buf)
endfunc

-" test for issue #4862
+" Test for issue #4862: pasting above 'cursorline' redraws properly.
func Test_put_before_cursorline()
new
only!
- call setline(1, 'A')
+ call setline(1, ['A', 'B', 'C'])
+ call cursor(2, 1)
redraw
- let std_attr = screenattr(1, 1)
+ let std_attr = screenattr(2, 1)
set cursorline
redraw
- let cul_attr = screenattr(1, 1)
+ let cul_attr = screenattr(2, 1)
normal yyP
redraw
- " Line 1 has cursor so it should be highlighted with CursorLine.
- call assert_equal(cul_attr, screenattr(1, 1))
- " And CursorLine highlighting from the second line should be gone.
- call assert_equal(std_attr, screenattr(2, 1))
+ " Line 2 has cursor so it should be highlighted with CursorLine.
+ call assert_equal(cul_attr, screenattr(2, 1))
+ " And CursorLine highlighting from line 3 should be gone.
+ call assert_equal(std_attr, screenattr(3, 1))
set nocursorline
bwipe!
endfunc
diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c
index 408dd37b9..7e07e66f5 100644
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -704,6 +704,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =

static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+ 82,
/**/
81,
/**/
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages