https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/12120
(43 files)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
@yegappan pushed 1 commit.
—
View it on GitHub or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
Merging #12120 (b1eafc4) into master (7ac5023) will decrease coverage by
0.82%.
The diff coverage is97.02%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #12120 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 81.93% 81.11% -0.82% ========================================== Files 164 154 -10 Lines 194067 183608 -10459 Branches 43829 41239 -2590 ========================================== - Hits 159009 148939 -10070 + Misses 22225 21723 -502 - Partials 12833 12946 +113
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| huge-clang-none | 82.65% <97.02%> (+<0.01%) |
⬆️ |
| huge-gcc-none | ? |
|
| huge-gcc-testgui | ? |
|
| huge-gcc-unittests | 0.29% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
| linux | 81.11% <97.02%> (-1.25%) |
⬇️ |
| mingw-x64-HUGE | ? |
|
| mingw-x86-HUGE | ? |
|
| windows | ? |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/ex_cmds2.c | 78.98% <0.00%> (-2.18%) |
⬇️ |
| src/vim9type.c | 87.00% <50.00%> (-3.06%) |
⬇️ |
| src/syntax.c | 79.61% <83.33%> (-0.77%) |
⬇️ |
| src/highlight.c | 78.83% <85.71%> (-2.69%) |
⬇️ |
| src/vim9class.c | 80.35% <93.75%> (-1.43%) |
⬇️ |
| src/alloc.c | 78.21% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
| src/autocmd.c | 86.08% <100.00%> (-1.43%) |
⬇️ |
| src/blob.c | 89.87% <100.00%> (-2.08%) |
⬇️ |
| src/channel.c | 82.50% <100.00%> (-0.60%) |
⬇️ |
| src/debugger.c | 88.70% <100.00%> (-3.43%) |
⬇️ |
| ... and 177 more |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
Yegappan wrote:
> * Add a macro to iterate over all the grow array items
Hmm, I'm not sure this is really an improvement. There isn't any
complexity that the macro takes care of, and it shortens the code only a
little bit. A disadvantage is that it obscures what the for loop really
does. And inlining the declaration of the loop variable would require
another macro.
What do others think?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
@yegappan do you still think this is good to include?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you commented.![]()
Closed #12120.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you commented.![]()
closing because seems to have been staled
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.![]()