Patch 9.0.1437

[Bram Moolenaar]

Patch 9.0.1437 (after 9.0.1436)
Problem: Test fails with different error number.
Solution: Adjust the expected error.
Files: src/testdir/test_listdict.vim


*** ../vim-9.0.1436/src/testdir/test_listdict.vim 2023-02-27 14:59:53.266085290 +0000
--- src/testdir/test_listdict.vim 2023-04-01 22:23:51.065790982 +0100
***************
*** 1384,1390 ****
call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR l = [1, 2, 3]', 'LET l[1.1] = 4'], ['E805:', 'E1012:', 'E805:'])
call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR l = [1, 2, 3]', 'LET l[: i] = [4, 5]'], ['E121:', 'E1001:', 'E121:'])
call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR l = [1, 2, 3]', 'LET l[: 3.2] = [4, 5]'], ['E805:', 'E1012:', 'E805:'])
! call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR t = test_unknown()', 'echo t[0]'], 'E685:')
endfunc

" Test for a null list
--- 1384,1390 ----
call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR l = [1, 2, 3]', 'LET l[1.1] = 4'], ['E805:', 'E1012:', 'E805:'])
call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR l = [1, 2, 3]', 'LET l[: i] = [4, 5]'], ['E121:', 'E1001:', 'E121:'])
call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR l = [1, 2, 3]', 'LET l[: 3.2] = [4, 5]'], ['E805:', 'E1012:', 'E805:'])
! call v9.CheckLegacyAndVim9Failure(['VAR t = test_unknown()', 'echo t[0]'], ['E685:', 'E909:', 'E685:'])
endfunc

" Test for a null list
*** ../vim-9.0.1436/src/version.c 2023-04-01 22:05:35.159519020 +0100
--- src/version.c 2023-04-01 22:22:53.269732920 +0100
***************
*** 697,698 ****
--- 697,700 ----
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+ /**/
+ 1437,
/**/

--
ARTHUR: Bloody peasant!
DENNIS: Oh, what a give away. Did you hear that, did you hear that, eh?
That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me, you saw it
didn't you?
The Quest for the Holy Grail (Monty Python)

/// Bram Moolenaar -- Br...@Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// \\\
\\\ sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///