Describe the bug
I'm not sure this is a real bug, but I perceive it so.
The line
Plug 'k-takata/matchit.vim'
in my .vimrc has an error in the syntax coloring: 'k-takata/matchit.vim' is not colored as a string, but as the sequence of different groups. What triggers the error is the first two characters being a [a-zA-Z0-9] and a -.
To Reproduce
Detailed steps to reproduce the behavior:
vim -u NONE file.vim:syntax onPlug 'k-takata/matchit.vim' to the bufferExpected behavior
'k-takata/matchit.vim' should be colored as a whole string.
Screenshots
Environment (please complete the following information):
VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2 (2019 Dec 12, compiled Jun 21 2020 16:11:23)
Included patches: 1-814
Compiled by Arch Linux
Huge version with GTK3 GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
+acl -farsi +mouse_sgr +tag_binary
+arabic +file_in_path -mouse_sysmouse -tag_old_static
+autocmd +find_in_path +mouse_urxvt -tag_any_white
+autochdir +float +mouse_xterm +tcl/dyn
-autoservername +folding +multi_byte +termguicolors
+balloon_eval -footer +multi_lang +terminal
+balloon_eval_term +fork() -mzscheme +terminfo
+browse +gettext +netbeans_intg +termresponse
++builtin_terms -hangul_input +num64 +textobjects
+byte_offset +iconv +packages +textprop
+channel +insert_expand +path_extra +timers
+cindent +ipv6 +perl/dyn +title
+clientserver +job +persistent_undo +toolbar
+clipboard +jumplist +popupwin +user_commands
+cmdline_compl +keymap +postscript +vartabs
+cmdline_hist +lambda +printer +vertsplit
+cmdline_info +langmap +profile +virtualedit
+comments +libcall +python/dyn +visual
+conceal +linebreak +python3/dyn +visualextra
+cryptv +lispindent +quickfix +viminfo
+cscope +listcmds +reltime +vreplace
+cursorbind +localmap +rightleft +wildignore
+cursorshape +lua/dyn +ruby/dyn +wildmenu
+dialog_con_gui +menu +scrollbind +windows
+diff +mksession +signs +writebackup
+digraphs +modify_fname +smartindent +X11
+dnd +mouse +sound -xfontset
-ebcdic +mouseshape +spell +xim
+emacs_tags +mouse_dec +startuptime -xpm
+eval +mouse_gpm +statusline +xsmp_interact
+ex_extra -mouse_jsbterm -sun_workshop +xterm_clipboard
+extra_search +mouse_netterm +syntax -xterm_save
system vimrc file: "/etc/vimrc"
user vimrc file: "$HOME/.vimrc"
2nd user vimrc file: "~/.vim/vimrc"
user exrc file: "$HOME/.exrc"
system gvimrc file: "/etc/gvimrc"
user gvimrc file: "$HOME/.gvimrc"
2nd user gvimrc file: "~/.vim/gvimrc"
defaults file: "$VIMRUNTIME/defaults.vim"
system menu file: "$VIMRUNTIME/menu.vim"
fall-back for $VIM: "/usr/share/vim"
Compilation: gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_GTK -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng16 -I/usr/include/fribidi -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/libmount -I/usr/include/blkid -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/at-spi2-atk/2.0 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/at-spi-2.0 -pthread -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -D_REENTRANT -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1
Linking: gcc -L. -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now -fstack-protector-strong -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/perl5/5.32/core_perl/CORE -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--as-needed -o vim -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -lz -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lharfbuzz -latk-1.0 -lcairo-gobject -lcairo -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lSM -lICE -lXt -lX11 -lXdmcp -lSM -lICE -lm -ltinfo -lelf -lcanberra -lacl -lattr -lgpm -ldl -Wl,-E -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/perl5/5.32/core_perl/CORE -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now -fstack-protector-strong -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/perl5/5.32/core_perl/CORE -lperl -lpthread -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lc -L/usr/lib -ltclstub8.6 -ldl -lz -lpthread -lm
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.![]()
I can confirm that:
'k is shown as vimMark.
- is shown as vimOper.
. is shown as vimOper.
vim is shown as vimCommand.
@cecamp Could you check this?
BTW, k-takata/matchit.vim is now merged into chrisbra/matchit, and it is included in the official Vim repository.
not only -, but + and , also.
perhaps ! too ..
I take back my earlier vimdev comment, there is a (simple!) way to avoid the unwanted highlighting. Please try the newest syntax/vim.vim from my website
Closed #6331.
Runtime files should be always sent to Bram by the authors explicitly to avoid including the wrong versions.
(The latest files can be still under development.)
sent to Bram by the authors explicitly
yea, it's ok if to runtime/builtin plugins, but to those legacy/classic but not a builtin plugin, i am a little worried ..
e.g: dbext.vim in vim.org looks newer/updated than there ..
though 'vim-scripts' repo perhaps (?) was not a official site of vim, but some plugin mgr tools needs github repo as its source.
so if it sync/ci-method can freq fetch vim.org to 'vim-scripts' repo that would be great,
specially to those no individual github repo (by plugin owner) but only ftp(ed) to vim.org ..
// that's ok: we kept updating pkg to vim.org,
// but probably better: it had a mirror (even readonly - no pr/issue track - owner still kept its offline patching/sending workflow - contact by mail at file header - etc) all in (e.g:) 'vim-scripts' repo also,
// unless owner had his/her own ..
The vim-scripts repo has ended. https://vim-scraper.github.io/
The vim-scripts repo has ended. https://vim-scraper.github.io/
yes, i see, that's one of worried ..
or we may (or just to myself) can write a spider to compare version between vim.org and vim-scripts by git-tag, then get the latest one from one of them. :)
ok then, if no vim-scripts anymore, looks i figure out a workaround (to myself at least) .. :)
It is quite dangerous to fetch from multiple repo's on github. If someone's account is compromised it's easy for a trojan horse to sneak in, since nobody actually looks at the content. Having one central version reduces the risk by a few orders of magnitude. AFAIK there is no virus scanner for Vim script, this relies on manual inspection and reporting.
yea, that's true. even it was an open source code - still had such risk ..
// anyway, "good" news is those legacy plugins (not the runtime builtin in vim itself) had been very less which no owner owned repo, we can manually compare / dwn / upd (from vim.org) as well ..