Prof. Ojo’s intervention is timely, unsettling, and necessary. What we are witnessing is not merely a “certificate craze” but a deeper governance failure: the conversion of academic institutions into theatres of exception for political power.
The Nigerian university system is being pressed into a familiar role, one it has played before in other sectors of national life, where rules remain formally intact, but are quietly re-engineered for those with influence. This is not new illegality; it is selective legitimacy.
A PhD is, by design, a slow, disciplined encounter with uncertainty, method, and original contribution. Time is not an incidental requirement; it is constitutive of the degree itself. When a doctoral journey that ordinarily spans three to six years is compressed into months for a serving political officeholder, the issue is not personal brilliance. It is institutional compromise.
What is particularly troubling is the structural pattern Prof. Ojo identifies. Once honorary doctorates were rightly curtailed by the NUC, the appetite for titles did not disappear; it migrated. The system simply substituted one pathway for another, symbolic recognition replaced by “regular” degrees awarded at honorary speed. This confirms a hard truth about governance: when prestige is valued more than process, power will always find a compliant route.
Importantly, this is not a politician-only problem. Politicians cannot award themselves PhDs. Universities do. Supervisors, examiners, postgraduate committees, Senates, and quality assurance units all sit at the junction where integrity either holds or yields. When they yield, the damage is collective. Genuine scholars are devalued, institutional credibility erodes, and Nigeria’s intellectual capital is quietly hollowed out.
The danger here is long-term. International recognition of Nigerian degrees depends not on declarations, but on trust in process. Once that trust is broken, it is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild. A doctoral title that cannot survive scrutiny becomes a political ornament.
Prof. Ojo is right to call this a turning point. The Committee of Deans and Provosts of Postgraduate Schools, university Senates, and the NUC must treat this moment not as controversy management, but as system repair. Transparent audits, enforceable timelines, and real sanctions are no longer optional.
This is not about envy, politics, or personalities. It is about whether Nigerian universities remain communities of knowledge or descend into credential factories for the powerful. History suggests that institutions rarely collapse loudly; they fail quietly, one exception at a time.
The warning has been sounded. What remains is whether those entrusted with academic stewardship will act.
By the way, would ASUU say or do something about this, I doubt?
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/DS4PR06MB11346D6EC45E9EB45CDC76C32F881A%40DS4PR06MB11346.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.