Tinubu: 2021 Sardauna Memorial Lecture

31 views
Skip to first unread message

Toyin Falola

unread,
Mar 27, 2021, 5:30:43 PM3/27/21
to dialogue

Speech by HE Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu as chairman of the 2021 Sardauna Memorial Lecture held on Saturday, March 27, 2021 at the Arewa House, Kaduna.

 

It is an honour to chair an auspicious occasion like this. 

 

It’s a rare opportunity to stand in this hallowed place where Sir Ahmadu Bello, the late Sardauna of Sokoto, lived. The Sardauna was more than just the premier of the Northern region, he stood among the founding fathers of our great country. 

 

The nation-building contributions made by Sir Ahmadu Bello can never be overstated. More importantly, they should never be forgotten. He laboured tirelessly and with great tact and intelligence. Working together with other shining lights such as the late sage Papa Obafemi Awolowo and the esteemed Nnamdi Azikiwe, this great Sardauna of Sokoto helped establish Nigeria as one indivisible and independent nation. He was one of the chief architects and builders laying the foundation for the nation destined to be the leader of Africa and a model for the black race. It is upon the foundation laid by these extraordinary men that we must continue to build so that Nigeria may achieve its manifest destiny and realise the promise of a greatness too long deferred. 

 

Let me at this point commend the organizers of this auspicious event for their consistency and perseverance in holding this lecture series which, over the years, has served as a platform to discuss issues of serious national importanceFor a nation to know where it’s going, it must first know from where it comes

 

The topic; Reduction of the Cost of Governance for Inclusive Growth and Youth Development in Northern Nigeria In a Post-COVID-19 era, is more than timely, particularly given the serious security challenges that have become one of theprimary causes of despair and frustration among all Nigerians, young and old alike. That frustration and despair are, in large part, caused by chronic poverty and the breakdown in social institutions wrought by such longstanding suffering.

 

In the midst of our local challenges came the COVID-19pandemic, with its debilitating impact on the global and domestic economiesNigeria, like many other countries, has not been spared the impact of the pandemic. 

 

Commendably, however, President Muhammadu Buhari has been carefully steering the country through the pandemic such that the negative impact on us and the economy has not been as harsh as it might have beenThe economy’s relapse into recession has ended but we must admit the economy remains weak with too much unemployment and resources left idle.

 

Cost of governance is always a key factor in the socio-economic development of any nation. But it is also one side of an important coin. We must not look at the cost alone. We must weigh the cost against the benefits derived therefrom. For example, one can pay a high cost on a productive enterprise but reap a higher benefit. Such would be considered a good investment. However, one can pay a low cost but reap no benefit at all because the endeavour was inherently unproductive. This would be a waste. Thus, we must be careful in what we say and truly mean when we talk of the costs of governance.  

 

The development of any populous nation has always been dependent on the ability of government to allocate sufficient funds to projects and programs that create and encourage enduring growth and employment. We must reject that mode of thinking that assumes government expenditure is inherently unproductive as well as harmful to the overall economy. 

 

It is not the fact that government expenditure is intrinsically wrong any more than one can say all private sector activity is economically positive. Government can be wasteful or it can be the key component to growth just as a private sector business can function profitably or spend itself into bankruptcy. The issue is not whether government is spending money or not. The real issue is the economic utility and quality of the expenditure.

 

Fiscal wisdom but not necessarily austerity is required for an economy like ours in a time like this, to ensure equitable wealth redistribution and meaningful use of resources. The years have shown that the private sector is much too weak to spur the growth we need. If the private sector could manage this feat, it would have already done so. Where the privatesector is too weak or unable, the government must fill the void. This means government must not be afraid to embark on an activist fiscal policy to create jobs, build infrastructure and develop our industrial sector as well as continue to improve agriculture. This means government must spend money but spend it on those things that bring the requisite economic returns for the nation

 

Here, one must make the point about the urgency of the need to think outside of the box in finding solutions to the challenges posed by our unemployed youth. Because of the currency issuing power of the federal government, it is not bound to balance budgets like individuals and state governments are. Moreover, because of this currency power, federal expenditures are not constrained by federal tax or revenue intake. Just as importantly, what I advocate is something that can be applied to both the common and unique developmental challenges of the north and south so that the nation moves in unison without any group or region feeling left out or estranged from national progress. 

 

Thus, while states and local government must shape their budgets to fit their revenues, the federal government can and should spend more to create more jobs for the youth in both the north and south which is key to eradicating restiveness and sundry criminality among the youth. Take a look at the world. Those nations that recovered most quickly from the 2009 economic crisis and now from COVID-19 are those nations that most engaged in government stimulus spending to revive their flagging economies. This was not by accident. It is due to purposeful policy and the deeper understanding of the nature of money and a the role of a national government in saving a flagging economy. Thus, America recently embarked on US$1.9 trillion stimulus to buoy the economy. It was not said that this government spending would erode jobs but that it would create them. Thus, we should not be so against government spending. If it is for the right purposes, it can do essential things that the private sector cannot. What we should be against is wasteful government spending. 

 

Building vital infrastructure such as irrigation and water catchment systems will help agriculture, arrest desertification and provide jobs. Only government has the power and resources to call forth such a program. Another readily available area primed for investment is the agro allied industry which, for the northern region is particularly advantageous. 

 

Urban populations are growing but urban jobs are not. Here, government must implement a national industrial policy to encourage key industries that begin to employ this growing urban work force.

 

Like I said in my recent statement on the pressing issue of the herder and farmer dispute, we must appreciate that martial security measures alone will not suffice. Problems that are essentially of an economic origin must also have an economic solution. Enhanced security may be the necessary first step, but it cannot be the only step. We cannot resolve this problem by holding on to one-dimensional answers. 

 

We must all be dispassionate in our search for solutions. These challenges are multi-faceted and so shall the solutions must be.  

 

The issue of insecurity, poverty, unemployment and extremism have many things to do with governance, over time. At bottom we must tackle our deep and widespread poverty. If we limit government’s role under the erroneous assumption that government spending is intrinsically unproductive then we tether ourselves to failure. We would do well to more critically study how other populous nations such as the UKUS, Germany and China charted their course during their formative years. You will see that they did not adhere to small government or the purportedly free market. Government engaged in massive spending on infrastructure and education while also engaging in policies that protected industrial development and key aspects of the agricultural sector. Only when they matured and held advantages over other nations, did the UK and US begin to champion free markets and small government. We would do well to understand this history and learn what it means for our ownpursuit of development.

 

Permit me to close by thanking our chief host, Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasiru el Rufa'i and commend his graciousness and his strong support for this event. Once again, I thank the organisers of this auspicious event. I too look forward to the contributions of the day’s speakers, led by the Keynote Speaker, His Excellency Governor Simon Bako Lalong, Governor of Plateau State.  

 

I’m honoured and remain indebted to Ahmadu Bello University Zaria and Arewa House fopermitting me the singular pleasure of chairing this occasion. 

Thank you!




Sent from my iPhone

OLAYINKA AGBETUYI

unread,
Mar 28, 2021, 4:14:53 AM3/28/21
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com, dialogue



Asiwaju's blueprint: Govt must embark on activist fiscal policy to create jobs.

While stressing the importance of agro allied industries to create jobs and infrastructure, building a defensive wall round the northern periphery is left out in this address, to stave off the incessant incursion of violent elements into the country, keep importation of dangerous weapons out as well as create job opportunities.


OAA



Sent from my Galaxy
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/1C211B51-C69A-4CD1-B121-6616FCEE8FFD%40austin.utexas.edu.

Femi Segun

unread,
Mar 28, 2021, 9:49:25 AM3/28/21
to 'Chika Onyeani' via USA Africa Dialogue Series
Omoba OAA,
BAT is being prepared like Obasanjo was prepared. The North was not joking when they said through Maitama Sule that statecraft and rulership are their forte.  Tinubu knows this and he won't say anything that can jeopardize his chances. Unfortunately, another 10 years might just be a circus show of the continuity of rhetoric without substance or any fundamental change in how Nigeria is governed. Did you see him mention anything about restructuring either of value or of the lopsided federal structure? Yet, these were the key issues his party based their campaign on in 2015. Did you see him mention anything about corruption? Yet APC said they will reduce corruption in Nigeria. The idea of an activist state may sound nice, but that is only to the extent that the state itself is developmental in focus and imbued with capacity: bureaucratic, administrative, and ideological.  The nature and the character of the elites must also change from a predatory -with focus on primitive accumulation to a developmental one.

Femi

OLAYINKA AGBETUYI

unread,
Mar 28, 2021, 7:40:08 PM3/28/21
to usaafric...@googlegroups.com



Omoba:

Asíwájú is not directly in government no matter how influential he may be, so it depends on those directly in government how much of his advocacy they adopt no matter the shortcomings of his prescriptions. Powerful northern power blocks may deflect them, after all many policies have been suggested that they turned deaf ears to.

We must remember that although he is not directly in government, he received undue flak and direct blame for the fallout of the # EndSARS protests despite his personal losses.  He then promised he would do all he could to prevent a repetition.

This address is in line with that pledge and it is not fortuitous he was invited to be chair of the occasion by the powers that be. This will shore up his support at his base in the South West if the government they alleged have abandoned him implement some of his prescriptions.

One thing is certain, his observations on government spending big on economic projects that regenerate the economy and create jobs have deep roots in the West as cited, from the American New Deal to the current spending by the EU, the UK and the US to re-flate the economy after the Covid economic devastation, particularly in the West.



OAA






Sent from my Galaxy



-------- Original message --------
From: Femi Segun <solor...@gmail.com>
Date: 28/03/2021 14:54 (GMT+00:00)
To: 'Chika Onyeani' via USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafric...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Tinubu: 2021 Sardauna Memorial Lecture

Boxbe This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (solor...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info
Omoba OAA,
BAT is being prepared like Obasanjo was prepared. The North was not joking when they said through Maitama Sule that statecraft and rulership are their forte.  Tinubu knows this and he won't say anything that can jeopardize his chances. Unfortunately, another 10 years might just be a circus show of the continuity of rhetoric without substance or any fundamental change in how Nigeria is governed. Did you see him mention anything about restructuring either of value or of the lopsided federal structure? Yet, these were the key issues his party based their campaign on in 2015. Did you see him mention anything about corruption? Yet APC said they will reduce corruption in Nigeria. The idea of an activist state may sound nice, but that is only to the extent that the state itself is developmental in focus and imbued with capacity: bureaucratic, administrative, and ideological.  The nature and the character of the elites must also change from a predatory -with focus on primitive accumulation to a developmental one.

Femi

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 4:14 AM OLAYINKA AGBETUYI <yagb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages