Dear Colleagues,
Please find below a Call for Papers for a beautiful Nigerian Journal you might be interested in!
All the best,
Bjoern Freter
Ewanlen issn: 2756-505x
A Journal of Philosophical Inquiry
Editors:
The Board of Studies, Philosophy Department, Ambrose Alli University, Nigeria:
Assoc. Prof Mrs. J.O. Ehiakhamen (Editor-in-Chief), A.E. Iyare (Executive editor), Prof J. A. Aigbodioh, Assoc. Prof M.L. Igbafen, Assoc. Prof M.A. Izibili, Dr M.N. Eribo, K.U. Abudu.
Advisory Editorial Board
Prof Isaac E. Ukpokolo (University of Ibadan), Prof Joseph Osei (Fayetteville State University), Prof Polycarp Ikuenobe (Kent State University), Prof Jim Unah (University of Lagos), Dr. Bjorn Freter (Independent Scholar, USA), Dr E. Imafidon (SOAS University of London),
Journal Rationale and Guidelines
Among the Esan people of Southern Nigeria, ewanlen connotes wisdom, reasonableness and sensibility. Hence an Esan elder, a man of epistemic competence, a morally sound mind and a highly cerebral custodian of the traditions and thought systems of the people, is referred to as an owanlen. Thus, when the Board of Studies of the premier Philosophy Department in the Esan region of Southern Nigeria reached a decision to launch a departmental journal of philosophy, the word ewanlen was picked as apt and catching enough to represent the goals of the journal and to signal where it has emerged from. Ewanlen: A Journal of Philosophical Inquiry is so named for three reasons: first, it is the premier journal of philosophy from the Esan region; second, its title connotes a strong interest in African philosophy and the philosophy of culture in general; and third, the word ‘ewanlen’ carries with it the very thrust of philosophical inquiry in all its ramification and diversity.
Ewanlen is an annual journal of philosophy that publishes every September 15 thoroughly reviewed and highly scholarly essays in any branch of philosophical inquiry. Essays that do not reflect the rigour of philosophy would not be published. All submissions are to come in not later than the 31th of July of each year. A submitted article for review must not exceed 7,000 words. The journal uses the note and bibliography form of the Chicago Referencing Style (16th Ed.). To submit an article for consideration for publication in the journal, kindly send it to p...@aauekpoma.edu.ng or aiy...@aauekpoma.edu.ng.
For more information or inquiries contact:
Austine E. Iyare
Department of Philosophy,
Faculty of Arts,
Ambrose Alli University,
Ekpoma, Nigeria.
Just for my own curiosity, does “wisdom” translates into “philosophy”?
If so, can I call a foolish person a philosopher?
I am curious because you tie the name of the journal to an Esan concept of “wisdom.”
I am not a philosopher, which is why I want to know.
TF
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at
http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/000201d6ed5a%24ab3a69e0%2401af3da0%24%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/SN7PR06MB7247C4A6CE3301AC32095CF4F8A40%40SN7PR06MB7247.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/SN7PR06MB7247C4A6CE3301AC32095CF4F8A40%40SN7PR06MB7247.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.
Sir:
What is “right philosophy?”
Is there a “wrong philosophy?”
I want to learn, as I am not conversant with Philosophy.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/DB6PR04MB29821969D2F8BD0B00278E07A6A40%40DB6PR04MB2982.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/DB6PR04MB29821969D2F8BD0B00278E07A6A40%40DB6PR04MB2982.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/DB6PR04MB29821969D2F8BD0B00278E07A6A40%40DB6PR04MB2982.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com.
Edited
Thanks, Ken.
Slight additions-
In Greek, from where the word "philosophy" comes, it means "love of wisdom".
The first page of a Google search clarifies that.
The definition does not discriminate between a right or wrong philosophy.
Ancient Greek philosophy was quite diverse, so the non-prescriptive nature of how philosophy was understood in that context is understandable.
There is a significant difference as well as convergence between Parmenides, for example, and Aristotle, as well as convergences between Parmenides and Plato in the use of mythic forms not shared with Aristotle, even as Aristotle shares in Plato's style of logic.
Socrates, if I recall correctly, is described as critical of the Sophists, but the latter represent an important strand of ancient Greek philosophy.
We also need to be careful in translating terms from Western linguistic and discursive traditions into other languages and cognitive traditions since different epistemic contexts are at play.
It's more realistic, for example, to bracket out various Yoruba characterizations relating to cognitive and creative expertise, such as ogbon, ologbon, awo, babalawo, ase, alase and ifogbontaayese, the latter presented by Babatunde Lawal in The Gelede Spectacle, referencing on p. 289 the larger analyses by Moses Makinde, Lawuyi and Olufemi Taiwo.
One may be better off examining those concepts on their own terms, then comparing them with ideas of cognitive mastery or cognitive pursuit from other discursive traditions and with the diversities within particular traditions.
A much richer tapestry of understanding is thereby developed of
how different cultures and diverse people and groups within particular
cultures have characterized the quest for knowledge.
Henry Corbin published a book subtitled Iran and Philosophy, but which kind of philosophy is he referring to in the various expressions of the term as it has developed across the centuries in the Western tradition?
Medieval Western philosophy? If so, which of what might be the various strands, from Anselm to Aquinas, for example?
Beyond the medieval, the various kinds represented by Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche and Heidegger, figures who share convergences and significant divergences in their philosophical practices and goals?
Where would Corbin's Iran and Philosophy stand in relation to the contemporary divisions and conjunctions between Western Analytical and Continental philosophies?
The term ''philosophy' may best be understood as a conceptual shorthand, a way of simplifying a complex idea of diverse expressions, particularly when applied outside the tradition of linear logic in terms of which it may be described as best known in the Western tradition.
Thanks
Toyin
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/DM5PR12MB2456393549CA3986541D8FB5DAA40%40DM5PR12MB2456.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
My Comment: This is again nice .At Wits philosophy conference in 2017, this contributor attempted to know whether African philosophers have cared to love wisdom through their linguistic thought schemes. Happily an SA philosopher provided some answers to this trying to suggest what philosophy could mean in an endogenous SA language. We yet must decolonize to find out how or whether what we do as formal intellection has a clear African character or we keep gambling with other people's thought schemes that does not give space to our own. We can only own knowledge and produce knowledge within the contest of modernity by doing this.
My Comment: The trouble is why are African languages not privileged in all these knowledge production we do .We yet must do that or prepare the next generation to do that.It will be a great thing to see people seek for African wisdom in and through the African language!
My Comment: Yes but one illusive centre appears hell bent on forcing others to see the world through one eye. And I ask-why do people not commit suicide in other places as they do in these " illusive knowledge centre"? Cant suicide be called a full measure of the failure of knowledge and wisdom! Just asking!
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/1811870353.100659.1611656602147%40mail.yahoo.com.
The first page of a Google search should clarify that.
The definition does not discriminate between a right or wrong philosophy.
Ancient Greek philosophy was quite diverse, so the non-prescriprive nature of how philosophy was understood in that context is understandable.
We also need to be careful in translating terms from Western lingustic and discursive traditions into other languages and cognitive traditions since different epistemic contexts are at play.
It's more realistic, for example, to bracket out various Yoruba characterizations relating to cognitive expertise, such as ologbon, awo, alase and ifogbontaayese, the latter presented by Babatunde Lawal in The Gelede Spectacle, referencing on p. 289 the larger analyses by Moses Makinde, Lawuyi and Olufemi Taiwo.
One may be better off examining these concepts on their own terms, then comparing them with ideas of cognitive mastery or cognitive pursuit from other discursive traditions and with the diversities within particular traditions.
A much richer tapestry of understanding is thereby developed of how different cultures and diverse people and groups within particular cultures have characterized the quest for knowledge.
Thanks
Toyin
"In Greek, from where the word "philosophy" comes, it means "love of wisdom".
The first page of a Google search should clarify that.
The definition does not discriminate between a right or wrong philosophy."
My Comment :This is a beautiful contribution to the extent that it gives philosophy its open character. How a philosopher locates his enterprise depends on what he or she considers the most important problems of life and existence and since perspectives on this can vary, it gives rise to different philosophies all united by love of wisdom.
"Ancient Greek philosophy was quite diverse, so the non-prescriptive nature of how philosophy was understood in that context is understandable.
We also need to be careful in translating terms from Western linguistic and discursive traditions into other languages and cognitive traditions since different epistemic contexts are at play."
My Comment: This is again nice .At Wits philosophy conference in 2017, this contributor attempted to know whether African philosophers have cared to love wisdom through their linguistic thought schemes. Happily an SA philosopher provided some answers to this trying to suggest what philosophy could mean in an endogenous SA language. We yet must decolonize to find out how or whether what we do as formal intellection has a clear African character or we keep romancing with other people's thought schemes that do not give space to our own. I would think that we can only own knowledge and produce knowledge within the contest of modernity by doing this.
"It's more realistic, for example, to bracket out various Yoruba characterizations relating to cognitive expertise, such as ologbon, awo, alase and ifogbontaayese, the latter presented by Babatunde Lawal in The Gelede Spectacle, referencing on p. 289 the larger analyses by Moses Makinde, Lawuyi and Olufemi Taiwo."
One may be better off examining these concepts on their own terms, then comparing them with ideas of cognitive mastery or cognitive pursuit from other discursive traditions and with the diversities within particular traditions.
My Comment: The trouble is why are African languages not privileged in all these knowledge production we do .We must do that or prepare the next generation to do that.It will be a great thing to see people seek for African wisdom in all dimensions in and through the African language!
A much richer tapestry of understanding is thereby developed of how different cultures and diverse people and groups within particular cultures have characterized the quest for knowledge.
My Comment: Yes but one illusive centre appears hell bent on forcing others to see the world through one eye. And I ask-why do people not commit suicide in other places as they do in these " illusive knowledge centre"? Can’t suicide be called a full measure of the failure of knowledge and wisdom! Just asking!
"Thanks
Toyin"
My Comment: Thanks for provoking these thoughts!
Editorial error in the first edition of the comments regretted
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/1335379884.199244.1611683100500%40mail.yahoo.com.