I know so little about all this but believe that common sense and a sense of fair play should prevail here.
The figures are official, for all we know, a conservative estimate, and we may take their word for it, but for example, no one really knows how much oil leaving the shores of Nigeria, unofficially, and the extent of the unofficial exports was brought home to us recently with news of an oil tanker being seized at sea, laden with stolen oil
So, some mines are closing down, the price of the commodity is being determined by its availability on the world market, and the reality is that since the uranium is not going to last forever, what are the options for the poverty-stricken people of Niger and their already cash strapped economy?
The glimpses of poor infrastructure and the pictures of endless laterite roads leave one wondering what has France done for Niger since Niger became independent in 1960, and that's all of 63 years ago? This leaves the new era Africa wondering what would China not do in e,g Niger when it comes to building necessary infrastructure, roads, schools, hospitals, developing agriculture etc in exchange for uranium and other mineral assets and cooperation that Niger is willing to offer?
Whatever negotiations ECOWAS may conclude with the Junta, it's unlikely that it would be in the cards that the coup makers should retain their military rank and status if the deposed president/puppet were to be reinstated. So the probable compromise has to be that fresh elections should be held within the next three to five years, and in the meantime, the mining agreements etc will be revised, not necessarily revoked, but it's the people's finger and not the people of Nigeria and other neighbouring states that should have the final say so about the future of Niger’s domestic politics and Niger’srealtions with Burkina Faso Mali, Guinea, Chad, Algeria, Libya, the United States, France etc.
Today there have been massive people’s demonstrations in Niger in support of the coup.
Ostensibly, the people’s aims and the military's aims are the same: better life conditions for everybody which so far they say that the democratically elected government has woefully failed to deliver after two years of the country standing still/ some say deteriorating under their management. The sanctions that they want to pass on Niger will only increase the suffering that the people of Niger will unnecessarily have to endure, the kind of suffering/punishment that those who pass such sanctions hope will make the people turn against the military and bring both the people and the military to submission - although the people and the military would really much prefer to only submit to the one and only Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala !
--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/usaafricadialogue/ecxxGuGoaYM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/cd3b28ac-600b-4939-8cde-fc03fab71cadn%40googlegroups.com.
Ken,
To be fair to the people of Niger and the current Niger Military, the coup is not primarily about uranium, it’s about the mismanagement of the country’s resources and the country’s potential. Whenever and wherever coups occur in Africa, it's usually about bad government/ governance that’ usually entrenched, immobile and otherwise unmovable
What choice do the people usually have when it’s two or three bad apples contesting a presidential election and vying to be the next commander-in-thief? So, the people are generally, often reduced to having to choose between the lesser of two or three evils.
There's depth ( not debt) in singling out the IMF and the World as the devils dictating, structural adjustment programs demanding devaluation of the country’s currency and taking away various subsidies, be it subsidies to education - the bitter medicine that Jerry Rawlings once had to swallow, or taking away subsidies to agriculture….
The IMF, the World Bank, where you have people like Johnson Sirleaf once oiling that machinery.
And what is e. g. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, visibly supposed to be the beautiful face of the WTO, what is she saying and doing about the ongoing looting of Africa’s mineral resources and other precious commodities going for dirt cheap, apart from merely presiding over it and occasionally lamenting that we are in deep shit?
BTW, talking about villains, I'm sure that you too loved this lovable villain Samba Traoré
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
Ken,
Your scholar friend did not find any reason why the francafrique should all unshackle themselves from the bondage of the conditionalities imposed on them after ‘independence’? The reasons are clear and visible for all who love Africa to see.
Imagine estimating the present value of all the monetary reserves these countries deposited in french treasuries since independence, all the resources extracted from the African countries at below market prices, and the no-bid contracts ‘won’ by French companies since independence; france will be owing the African counties trillions of dollars today
These are the conditions that have made a monstrous group like the wagner appealing to the youth of these countries.
Sad indeed!!!
These youth who have been dancing in the streets of Burkina, Mali, and Niger are not crazy. They have simply had enough and they will support even the devil if it means the French will be kicked out.
Even deGaule acknowledged that France is only a powerful country because of dependence on resources from the francafrique. .
You see, the trouble with the colonial masters Britain and France is that, for over 60 years, they had the opportunity to help Africa develop economically. They had us as partners for far too long. But they took us for granted by assuming that we are comfortable with our horrible level of development. The moral of the story is that, if you take your partner’s needs for granted while you keep creating wealth for yourself based on the relationship, pretty soon the partner will file for separation. The person who acts surprised when the partner files for divorce is one who has taken the partner’s needs for granted for far too long.
I love france, I hold a visiting professorship at a university in France; but I am appalled at the financial and political relationships imposed on the francafrique. France does not deserve what it is confronted with now. But they brought it upon themselves.
As for the ECOWAS countries getting ready to ‘liberate’ Bazoum, I hope someone tells them how stupid the idea is.
It will end very badly. Africa does not need a regional war.
Kwaku
Sent from Mail for Windows
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/PH0PR13MB5331E2C5BCDAEB8B6D17C6BBC20EA%40PH0PR13MB5331.namprd13.prod.outlook.com.