1. life is defined as carbon based primarily
2. we don't understand our origins well enough to generalize (Plato's allegory of the cave)
3. Outside of theistic considerations, not integrated on modern astronomy, there is no cause to search for extra terrestrial consciousness.
4. Our pinhole view of the universe leaves us spectrum-bound, scale-limited and mind-lessly reductionist.
5. We assume afferent extra terrestrial life will seek corporate rather than individual partnerships on earth
6. We project our own desires for discovering life on the extra terrestrial mind and life forms
7. We neglect the 'earth mind' perspective e.g. Gaia which is probably the first level of interaction between earth and extra terrestrial life
8. Everything about how we plan and prepare to interact with life from outside earth is sense, sensory or sensor based, limiting points of approach.
9. We are incapable and disinterested in time unbound communication with extra terrestrial life, which will limit full understanding of any time bound communication we decode.
10. We assume extra terrestrial life wants to be or can be found on terms other than theirs and with instruments other than those of their own atmospheric realities. "The Earth's beak problem"
--
--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email three sentences or less?