
Blacks are said to be mostly infected with COVID-19 in the United States of America (USA), is it true? If yes, why?
Information in the United States about all things related to COVID-19 is
of course still underway, but so far, the research does indicate that
racial minorities – especially African Americans – are experiencing the
brunt of the crisis. For instance, a recent report from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that, among patients included
in the research, there were more hospitalized blacks than would have
been proportionately expected for their given communities. This was not
the case for other races or ethnicities, including the Latinx/Hispanic
community. Moreover, scientific researchers from Emory University, Johns
Hopkins University, the University of Mississippi, and Georgetown
University recently conducted a study that indicated that thus far,
black Americans represent about 60 percent of deaths in the United
States, even though black Americans only represent about 13 percent of
the population in the United States.The CDC and university researchers have hypothesized why this might
be. In the United States, racial and ethnic minorities often live in
densely populated housing situations due to institutionally racist
policies that have existed for decades, if not centuries. Considering
how immensely contagious this particular virus is, living in a densely
populated area is exactly the opposite of what one would want because of
frequent interactions with others and a lesser likelihood of being able
to social distance. Additionally, people of colour are more likely to
live in homes with multi-generational families, which means that older
family members who are already more susceptible to the virus can be more
easily infected. Also, these homes are usually far from reliable
medical facilities and groceries, which means that household members may
struggle to find the supplies and treatment that they need. Indeed,
this crisis, like others, has exposed the weak and insidious structure
of racism. The CDC also noted that for the case of COVID-19, people of colour are
disproportionately represented in “essential service” industries, which
means that while statistically more white people may have the luxury of
working from home, people of colour may not be able to do so. Instead,
they are more likely to be forced to put themselves at risk on a daily
basis by being around more people and performing more contact-based
tasks.
Some people in Nigeria still doubt the authenticity of
COVID-19. Indeed, some said it is not the same virus that has killed
many in America and Europe that is ravaging in this clime?
Nigerians’ skepticism is rooted in a long history of mutual suspicion
having its beginning in the deceitful relationship that the Nigerian
elites keep with the proletariat. Elitist arrogance is reflected in a
number of social engagements that combine them with the majority where
those at the echelon of power, or the middle-class, approximate the
behaviour of the common man with barbarism, primitivism, and crudeness.
This, therefore, is consolidated by the wide distance that exists
between these two divides and it, regrettably, places the have-nots
below the social pyramid. As such, the masses are poised to take their
pounds of flesh at every presented chance where their protest would be
well received, or registered. Apparently, the emergence of a dreadful
and fearful virus is the least expected around the world, and the
absence of global anticipation of such occurrence is reflected in the
social relationships kept with certain demographics, who have been the
twin victims of power marginalisation and objects of ridicule. Etched in
people’s subconscious, the elites therefore believed the occasions
where they would need cooperation of the masses are predictable; for
example, election period or the need for mobilisation for any reason.
And in turn, the Nigerian masses have internalised that stratification,
hence, their limited expectations from the elite.
However, COVID-19 presented the masses, the majority, an unusual opportunity to feed the elite of their malicious intentions against them, which have manifested in deceit, unfulfilled promises, and empty rhetoric. Therefore, the skepticism of the masses about the existence of the deadly virus was more of sarcasm than actual disbelief. Their indifference was a message to the powerful members of the society, who had long believed that there would not arise any situation that can make them rely on the social cooperation of the masses. And when it was more than necessary that every member of the community respects the laid down instructions for the containment of the virus, they responded derisively that COVID-19 was nonexistent, knowing that their feigned indifference would raise the elites heartbeat exponentially, as it was obvious that they do not want their medical welfarism compromised.
The case is laughably complicated by the familiar deceit of some
members of the government, who were, apart from adopting Western-induced
coping mechanism to the containment of the virus, milking the
commonwealth using the virus as the conduit pipe. It was therefore
logical that they questioned the authenticity of such medical emergency
knowing that it was natural that people should genuinely rise to the
occasion rather than nurse thoughts of siphoning the public wealth using
the virus of health to swell the virus of the pockets. Hence, that
reaction.
Provisional counts are not final and are subject to change. Counts from previous weeks are continually revised as more records are received and processed.
Provisional data are not yet complete. Counts will not include all deaths that occurred during a given time period, especially for more recent periods. However, we can estimate how complete our numbers are by looking at the average number of deaths reported in previous years.
Death counts should not be compared across states. Some states report deaths on a daily basis, while other states report deaths weekly or monthly. State vital record reporting may also be affected or delayed by COVID-19 related response activities.
For more detailed technical information, visit the Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Technical Notes page.
Provisional counts are not final and are subject to change. Counts from previous weeks are continually revised as more records are received and processed.
Provisional data are not yet complete. Counts will not include all deaths that occurred during a given time period, especially for more recent periods. However, we can estimate how complete our numbers are by looking at the average number of deaths reported in previous years.
Death counts should not be compared across states. Some states report deaths on a daily basis, while other states report deaths weekly or monthly. State vital record reporting may also be affected or delayed by COVID-19 related response activities.
For more detailed technical information, visit the Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Technical Notes page.