Spacey facing more charges in the UK

50 views
Skip to first unread message

Bob Jersey

unread,
Nov 16, 2022, 9:54:51 AM11/16/22
to TVorNotTV

Bob Jersey

unread,
Jun 15, 2023, 7:16:12 PM6/15/23
to TVorNotTV
He tells a German site that there are people waiting to give him work if/when he is cleared...
B

Moi, Nov 16th 2022:

Kevin M.

unread,
Jun 15, 2023, 7:52:15 PM6/15/23
to tvor...@googlegroups.com
I assume by “people” he means the producers of those horrific “God’s Not Dead” movies 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvornottv+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/52702b7f-e36e-4a7d-a3bf-4b7e1632deben%40googlegroups.com.
--
Kevin M. (RPCV)

Bob Jersey

unread,
Jun 28, 2023, 8:33:54 AM6/28/23
to TVorNotTV
From the judge's opening remarks, it sounds as though the jury won't be sequestered...
B

Moi, Nov 16th 2022:
They're up to 12. The first five will be heard in June.

Adam Bowie

unread,
Jun 28, 2023, 4:38:06 PM6/28/23
to tvor...@googlegroups.com
Sequestering juries is pretty rare in the UK. Probably in part because there are much tighter reporting restrictions on UK court cases - which includes everyone. The only reporting allowed is what factually took place in court - no commenting, theorising or anything else. Even random TikTok-ers doing catch-ups would be considered sub judice in the UK, and could lead to a mistrial. (Quite what would happen if what occurred on Tik Tok and YouTube with the US Depp/Heard case had happened with the prior UK case, I'm not sure).

Anyway, it means that there is less of an issue of needing to put jurors in a hotel to avoid seeing prejudicial coverage.



Adam



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvornottv+...@googlegroups.com.

PGage

unread,
Jun 28, 2023, 10:00:19 PM6/28/23
to tvor...@googlegroups.com
It’s pretty rare in the US too…

--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

Jim Ellwanger

unread,
Jun 28, 2023, 11:13:13 PM6/28/23
to tvorNotTV Bob Jersey via
A couple decades ago, I was on a jury for a civil trial in Federal court that was officially sequestered when we went to deliberations - which only took a few hours, so they didn't have to decide whether or not they were going to sequester us overnight. (We did get lunch on Uncle Sam's dime.) Because this was a boring employment discrimination case that wouldn't particularly have interested the news media, I suspect the sequestration was more of a formality so that they could have a U.S. marshal watching to make sure that none of the jurors disappeared at that point in the proceedings.


Steve Timko

unread,
Jul 26, 2023, 1:24:15 PM7/26/23
to TV or Not TV
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages