Should Sydney’s light rail carriages be modified after second death in two years? | Transport | The Guardian

43 views
Skip to first unread message

Tony Galloway

unread,
Jun 6, 2025, 11:09:07 PM6/6/25
to tramsdownunder
This individual died because they ignored the warning, did something profoundly stupid and suffered the consequences.

If the vehicle involved was a truck and trailer instead of a tram the incident would be regarded entirely as the fault of the deceased not as a “design problem” with the vehicle.

But if it runs on rails the vehicle is assumed to be the problem, not the actions of the individual who made a bad decision.

Tony

Should Sydney’s light rail carriages be modified after second death in two years?

Police believe man was crossing track between two carriages when struck, sparking safety debate

Police officers direct the public at Surry Hills light rail stop in Sydney, Thursday, 5 June, 2025.
Police say initial inquiries show the man was attempting to cross the light rail track between two carriages when the tram began moving and trapped him. Photograph: Paul Braven/AAP

For the second time in two years, a pedestrian has died after being struck by a tram on Sydney’s light rail.

New South Wales police said they found a man under a tram carriage in Surry Hills on Thursday afternoon. Paramedics treated him at the scene, but he died.

Police said initial inquiries showed the man was attempting to cross the light rail track between two carriages when the tram began moving and trapped him.

In May 2023, a teenage girl died after attempting to cross a street in Sydney’s CBD between two tram carriages. She became trapped underneath one of them when the tram started moving, suffering fatal injuries.

People cross the tram lines at Surry Hills tram stop the day after a person was killed while crossing the tracks.
People cross the tram lines at Surry Hills tram stop the day after a person was killed while crossing the tracks. Photograph: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian

That two similar deaths occurred just two years apart meant police, the premier, and transport bureaucrats fielded questions from the media this week over whether the light rail network, and the trams themselves, should be made safer.

Dr Geoffrey Clinton, a senior lecturer in transport management at the University of Sydney, said it was “probably wise” for the government to investigate additional safety measures to stop people from attempting to climb over them.

Sydney’s light rail network uses a few different tram models – what bureaucrats call “rolling stock”. What they have in common is that they typically have separate carriages that are coupled together to form a longer vehicle, unlike trams in Melbourne, which have only one carriage.

Many of the trams now have “danger” signs on the joinery between the carriages, warning people not to try to climb over them. Clinton said the state government or the network’s private operator, Transdev, could consider additional signage.

“Or even something like a net between the two carriages to discourage people from trying to clamber through,” he said.

He posed the idea of running the trams twice as frequently with only one carriage, making them half as long, but said it didn’t “seem like a feasible solution”.

“[That] would very expensive to do and wouldn’t add to the capacity of the network, but it would double the labour cost,” he said.

The transport minister, John Graham, declined to comment. A Transport for New South Wales (TfNSW) spokesperson said the man’s death was “extremely distressing”.

The NSW police inspector Anderson Lessing on Thursday said that after speaking to witnesses and reviewing CCTV, it appeared the man had stepped between the tram carriages off the platform at the light rail stop on Devonshire Street.

The Surry Hills light rail stop in inner Sydney on 6 June, 2025.
The Surry Hills light rail stop in inner Sydney on 6 June, 2025. Photograph: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian

“There’s obviously risk involved, but it comes back to personal responsibility when you do cross the tram line, and it’s that balance that we have to get right,” he said.

The TfNSW coordinator-general, Howard Collins, expressed his condolences to the man’s family and first responders.

He said the Office of the National Rail Safety Regulator (ONRSR) would work with Transdev to establish whether any safety recommendations could be made or whether the death was “a case of really unfortunate misadventure”.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau and NSW Office of Transport Safety Investigations said they had not reviewed the 2023 death and would not to review Thursday’s one either.

“[We] have reviewed the initial available information and determined that, as in the 2023 occurrence … it is unlikely an independent transport safety investigation would identify any new or unknown transport safety factor that could prevent an incident of this nature from occurring in the future,” a spokesperson said.

The premier, Chris Minns, said he was sorry for the man and his family, but he wouldn’t be drawn on whether the government was considering any safety upgrades.

“The safety regulator’s in place,” he said. “It’s obviously the case that whenever there’s a terrible event like this, a terrible incident, they conduct an investigation.”

Terry Lee-Williams, a transport planning strategist, said it was “awful that somebody died”, but overall, Sydney’s light rail network was safe and “actually quite a low speed system”.

One suggestion for improving safety could be replacing the trams with the concertina-like ones used in Melbourne, he said, but this would be costly.

He said Sydney’s trams were a “standard design” and similar to those operated in many European countries.

“You don’t see much of the Melbourne-style trams around the world because they’re less accessible,” he said. “Sydney has very narrow, windy streets.”

TP

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 5:20:42 AM6/7/25
to TramsDownUnder
Mr Lee-Williams is not very informed in tramway matters.

Škoda has a design specifically directed at eliminating this sort of hazard in coupled trams. It can be seen for example in Turkey.


It's a sloping "bonnet" over the coupling that makes it basically impossible for somebody to stand on the coupling and hold onto something.

Tony P

Geoff Olsen

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 5:24:53 AM6/7/25
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com

Interesting as today I heard an opinion expressed that the man was not trying to climb over the coupler but merely slipped off the platform. Hopefully the enquiry will clear this up.

 

Geoff O.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tramsdownunde...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/2fe285d0-81a9-43c9-b023-5df7c6ad61cbn%40googlegroups.com.

TP

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 5:36:33 AM6/7/25
to TramsDownUnder
He was apparently "surfing' on the coupling.

Tony P

Geoff Olsen

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 5:45:27 AM6/7/25
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com

Well we shall see. My info came from someone close to the action but not authorised to speak publically.

Matthew Geier

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 6:09:27 AM6/7/25
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com
With cameras on both trams looking at each other and the cameras on the platform, there should be plenty of video evidence for the investigators to use to reconstruct the events, and all these cameras are digitally recorded and to separate systems (each tram has it's own recorder and the platform CCTV will be saved at the OCC)


Bob Pearce

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 8:36:05 AM6/7/25
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com

Hello all,

 

While I don’t wish to pre-empt any findings as to what caused the unfortunate passing of the deceased, It seems to me that the cries of fixing the problem that seems to exist at the rail vehicle is another way to blame everything, everyone, other than the reason the fatality occurred in the first place.

 

If any person is so lacking in intelligence, rational thinking, or are that full of bullsh*t and bravado, that they are immune to danger, then they create the very situation that has wrought upon themselves their destruction.

 

Why is it that the so called boffins, traffic experts, and other so-called intelligencer, have this quaint idea that by placing a knee jerk reaction to a perceived problem, that everyone else will comply.

i.e. Reduce the speed limits, that’ll mean less accidents and deaths or injuries because everyone is now driving slower.

It is the vast majority of sane, sensible people who drive to the speed limit, and are greatly affected by a reduction in speed in their daily commute.

 

The idiots who speed, will continue to do so, and heaven help you if you are in their way.

 

It is similar to suggesting that a “P” plate driver will slow down while driving a high powered vehicle for which they have no training or skill to drive, because a sign on the roadside shows a reduced speed limit.

 

We had a situation in Perth many years ago where a police pursuit was called off after the chase went through a school zone with a speed limit of 40kmh.

It was claimed that had the chase not been happening, the speeding driver would have slowed down at the school zone.

 

Whoever thinks that speeding drivers act in a responsible manner when driving through a school zone, or will slow down because the speed limit is reduced, has rocks in their heads, and no brains.

 

End of rant.

 

Bob in Perth

image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg

Bob Pearce

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 9:42:20 AM6/7/25
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com

To further my statement re the accident, by making the coupler or space between the two attached tram cars less accessible is a solution I suppose, but it does not get away from the original issue that the person was somewhere where he should not have been.

And no amount of signage, or camera view, will stop that behaviour from continuing. It might reduce it, perhaps, but if Fred Snerts the stupid, is adamant that he is going to access some place he has no right to be, and suffers for that lack of intelligence, then award him the Darwin Prize.

Again, the minority is affecting the behaviour of the majority. The world should not be held responsible for the stupidity of those who are stupid, and are not capable of taking responsibility for their own actions.

 

But as usual, the majority will have to put up with being inconvenienced by the actions of the idiot minority.

 

However, if this was a terrible accident that was caused by the person slipping off a platform stop, as was suggested by one poster, there is not much one can do about that.

 

Bob in Perth

image001.jpg
image002.jpg
image003.jpg

Mick Duncan

unread,
Jun 7, 2025, 10:57:58 AM6/7/25
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com
Gday  Bob, All

I totally agree

As Einstein said "There is a limit to mans intellegence but no limit
to his stupidity"

Cheers,    Mick
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages