I would like to tag onto this question with a question for a little more detail on copy with right click and drag in a local working copy (not repo browser operations). The crux of the question is relating to the server creating an additional copy in the history vs it simply creating a pointer, thus changing how much file space is used. This question relates some to the branch/tag operation which is like a copy but only allows the pointer/shortcut option thus preventing modification during copy. As always, this may bleed over to a true SVN question, not specific to TortoiseSVN, but it is how to use TortoiseSVN to get to the SVN operations. I am working on a 500MB Word file (so a binary file in the eyes of SVN) so it is readily apparent if it is uploading the entire file or just establishing a pointer/shortcut by the time it takes as in 5 seconds vs 2 minutes
If you right click and drag in your working copy, you also have the possibility of modifying the file after you right click and drag but before you do the commit of the copy. This modification doesn't really show up clearly in the log (which I think is a bit sad but probably a native SVN thing), it shows up the same as if you did or didn't modify it. There is no way to know just looking at the log if the file was modified during the copy, they all list in the actions column as an "add" but not modify. If there is, it would be great if someone would tell me. Usually I have to double click and do a diff each time if I want to know. I find it interesting that Tortoise nor SVN as any indication or error that the copy had no integrity from source to destination, it replaces with the file you have.
My question is, how can I/can I get TortoiseSVN to recognize that there was not a change in the file if I really don't want to change the file so that it does not have to transmit the entire file contents and save space on the server.
I also would like to see the ability to enforce/detect no modification during a copy/move before commit and in the log after.
Logs where 1033 doc was done with the branch operation where it didn't transfer the whole file or have a mod, but the others did and it is obvious that a modification occurred because the file extension changed on 1056 from .docx to .pdf and I dropped in the PDF over it to maintain a contiguous log. Sketchy I know, and I am essentially leaning on the fact that SVN is allowing me to do this, but it is by no means a requirement. I just didn't like the PDF pair to the docx showing up with no log behind it, I have no other way to show even superficially where the PDF was converted from other than the commit message or, what I used to do/usually do, commit the docx file and the PDF in the same commi. I did test from the repo browser (and the web browser access via VisualSVN, and it is infact committing the true PDF and not a copy of the Word file):
Revision: 6507
----
Added : /tags/System/QTR-1033_Rev_A.docx (Copy from path: /trunk/System/QTR-1033.docx, Revision, 6506)
Revision: 6505
----
Added : /tags/System/QTR-1056_Rev_B.docx (Copy from path: /trunk/System/QTR-1056.docx, Revision, 6503)
Added : /tags/System/QTR-1056_Rev_B.pdf (Copy from path: /trunk/System/QTR-1056.docx, Revision, 6503)
Revision: 6491
----
Added : /tags/System/QTP-1242/QTP-1242_Rev_B.docx (Copy from path: /trunk/System/QTP-1242.docx, Revision, 6490)
Added : /tags/System/QTP-1242/QTP-1242_Rev_B.pdf (Copy from path: /trunk/System/QTP-1242.docx, Revision, 6490)