shacl-af triple rule conditions

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Hi Irene

 

I tried (one way of the earlier owl euquivalence, now in shacl):

 

:Wegdeel

  a owl:Class, sh:NodeShape ;

  rdfs:subClassOf :IMGeo-Object ;

  sh:rule [ a sh:TripleRule ;

    sh:subject sh:this ;

    sh:predicate rdf:type ;

    sh:object :AsfaltverhardingMetDichteDeklagen ;

    sh:condition [ sh:property [

       sh:path :function ;

       sh:hasValue :rijbaan-lokaleweg ; ] ; ] ;

    sh:condition [ sh:property [

       sh:path :fysiekvoorkomen ;

       sh:hasValue :geslotenverharding ; ] ; ] ;

          ] ;

.

 

But in tbc, inferencing is not working and I see empty where clause:

Any idea?

 

Should I combine the conditions differently?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel...@tno.nl Location   This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

 

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Also tried:

 

:Wegdeel

  rdf:type owl:Class ;

  rdf:type sh:NodeShape ;

  rdfs:subClassOf :IMGeo-Object ;

  sh:rule [

      rdf:type sh:TripleRule ;

      sh:condition [

          sh:property [

              sh:path :function ;

              sh:hasValue :rijbaan-lokaleweg ;

            ] ;

          sh:property [

              sh:path :fysiekvoorkomen ;

              sh:hasValue :geslotenverharding ;

            ] ;

        ] ;

      sh:object :AsfaltverhardingMetDichteDeklagen ;

      sh:predicate rdf:type ;

      sh:subject sh:this ;

    ] ;

.

 

With no result (no inference of extra instance of :ASfaltverhardingMetDichteDeklagen),

Thx for advide, Michel

 

Ps

The other way round with sh:values rules goes without problems..

[Holger Knublauch]

I don't see anything obviously wrong. How did you run those rules - using the Run inferences buttons (or TBC or Transform on EDG)?

Hard to comment further without seeing a minimal, complete example that I could run myself.

Holger

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/fb55750b1ddc4935ad90a66cb2cbe8f1%40tno.nl.

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Hi David, I run from TBC.

Attached a minimal example.

Expected behaviour:

New instance for :AsfaltverhardingMetDichteDeklagen

 

 

Thx a lot, Michel

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/86972951-58b2-810a-eb6e-176b19bdbed2%40topquadrant.com.

[Holger Knublauch]

You had a typo, so the hasValue never conformed - functie vs function

Holger

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/1f6dd32b483c4cc9804e3a1bd98910d2%40tno.nl.

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Deeply ashamed ☹

 

But at the same time very happy since my owl-equivalence example now works perfectly 2-way in shacl-af ! 😊

 

Thx David!

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/be65d10a-6609-950e-301e-57a4a21845a4%40topquadrant.com.