I cannot think of a reason. How are you executing these rules? I tried a similar rule from TBC, but the example with ?s ?p ?o is of course hard to debug because all these triples are already there. Did you try a variation where ?o is a constant just to verify the particular rule actually fires?
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/e90378c0-5f5a-4d6d-9567-c5bcdfbe4de8%40googlegroups.com.
I cannot think of a reason. How are you executing these rules? I tried a similar rule from TBC, but the example with ?s ?p ?o is of course hard to debug because all these triples are already there. Did you try a variation where ?o is a constant just to verify the particular rule actually fires?
Holger
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/98a75183-4e01-79a5-3731-93726b7b9b56%40topquadrant.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com.
I see no such code that would exclude the owl:Ontology, and the SM module doesn't even know the base URI of the input graph.
Could you send me (off-list) an export of the graph that serves as input (sml:ExportToRDFFile), and the relevant shapes file(s) so that I can run this through a debugger?
Thanks
Holger
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/78abf4b5-00f8-45f4-aa72-48a53944dfa3%40googlegroups.com.