skos question

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

 

I have a skos ontology importing another skos ontology.

 

Import seems ok.

 

Stil I get the web icon when a concept from the example reused one via broader:

 

 

Should I add owl:Ontology next to skos:ConceptScheme?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel...@tno.nl Location   This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

 

[dprice]

On 28 Apr 2020, at 08:34, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users <topbrai...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

 

I have a skos ontology importing another skos ontology.

 

Do you really 1) mean “ontology” (i.e. the ontology that defines SKOS or some extensions to that) or 20 do you really mean SKOS taxonomy that imports another SKOS taxonomy?

I know it’s a bit confusing but the SKOS standard itself *is* actually an ontology defined using OWL. The instances based on that SKOS ontology are not an ontology - usually they’re called a taxonomy(e.g. an EDG Taxonomy) or something similar.

If 1) “ontology” them likely need to import the other OWL.

If 2) “taxonomy” then perhaps your PhysicalObject does not have any rdf:type associated with it? Perhaps it should be rdf:type skos:Concept?

Cheers,

David

Import seems ok.

 

Stil I get the web icon when a concept from the example reused one via broader:

 

<image004.jpg>

 

Should I add owl:Ontology next to skos:ConceptScheme?

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel...@tno.nl Location

<image005.gif>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ef51e4e1b0ac44fe8f64da7d3fc5dc01%40tno.nl.
<smls-skos.ttl><smls-example-skos.ttl>

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308

US +1 (336) 283-0808‬

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Hi David

 

I do not mean the skos ITSELF as ontology.

But an own skos:ConceptScheme.

 

PO is defined as:

 

smls:PhysicalObject

  a skos:Concept ;

 

in the example file importing the above:

 

ex:Bridge

  a skos:Concept ;

  skos:prefLabel "Bridge"@en ;

  skos:prefLabel "Brug"@nl ;

  skos:broader smls:PhysicalObject ;

  skos:definition "Verbinding voor verkeer tussen twee landhoofden die gescheiden wordt door water."@nl ;

.

 

 

But now I see:

  a skos:ConceptSchema;

 

 

iso

 

  a skos:ConceptScheme;

 

will check if that is the cause......

 

thx Michel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel...@tno.nl Location

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5F4E49C4-C8A8-4489-9220-2C425EB5E611%40topquadrant.com.

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

After changes still, world icon:

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/78166c7ab213411ab1aa61c0135eca61%40tno.nl.

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

 

But anyway, let me first check myself on typos.....

I’ll come back if needed...

 

Thx michel

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/507b843876a6471bbbbdab58a906c5c6%40tno.nl.

[Jan Voskuil]

Maybe [1] misses the owl:Ontology declaration, did you already try adding “, owl:Ontology” after “skos:ConceptScheme”? … -j

 

<https://w3id.org/def/smls-skos>

  a skos:ConceptScheme ;

  owl:imports <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core> ;

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/507b843876a6471bbbbdab58a906c5c6%40tno.nl.

[Bohms, H.M. (Michel)]

Hi Jan

 

The ontology clause was not needed.

It was in the end related to a wrong prefix towards smls.

 

Thx! Michel

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/AM0PR03MB374584345998604AA4A924B3E9AC0%40AM0PR03MB3745.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com.