versionIRI import question

48 views
Skip to first unread message

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)

unread,
Jan 31, 2024, 8:06:27 AM1/31/24
to topbrai...@googlegroups.com

Importing a versionIRI that is not defined as base-uri seems to result in error.

Is it always needed to publish explicitly also versionIRI’s?

(so, have the versionURI in ontology clause is not enough?)

 

Thx Michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment

T: 
M: +31630381220
E: michel...@tno.nl

Location

 

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

Holger Knublauch

unread,
Jan 31, 2024, 8:27:19 AM1/31/24
to 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
I don't see where we have special handling of owl:versionIRI, nor is it required for anything.

What error do you get and with what file?

Holger


On 31 Jan 2024, at 2:06 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users <topbrai...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Importing a versionIRI that is not defined as base-uri seems to result in error.
Is it always needed to publish explicitly also versionIRI’s?
(so, have the versionURI in ontology clause is not enough?)
 
Thx Michel
 
 
Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. 
 

-- 
The topics of this mailing list include TopBraid EDG and related technologies such as SHACL.
To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/de588300ab5c4552a15c345b79cb92af%40tno.nl.

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)

unread,
Jan 31, 2024, 9:34:52 AM1/31/24
to topbrai...@googlegroups.com

<basuri> a Ontology

                versionURI baseuri/1.2.3 ;

 

 

other ontology

import <versionURI/1.2.3>

 

gives issue…..

               

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment

T: 
M: +31630381220
E: michel...@tno.nl

Location

 

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)

unread,
Feb 1, 2024, 9:09:38 AM2/1/24
to topbrai...@googlegroups.com

I found:

https://community.stardog.com/t/owl-versioniri-not-resolved/450

 

quoting:

“

If O contains an ontology IRI OI and a version IRI VI, then the ontology document of O should be accessible via the IRI VI;
....
In contrast, an ontology document of an ontology that contains an ontology IRI http://www.example.com/my 1 and a version IRI http://www.example.com/my/2.0 1 should be accessible via the IRI http://www.example.com/my/2.0 1. In both cases, the ontology document should be accessible via the respective IRIs using the HTTP protocol.

“

 

can I found some explanation somewhere how tbc handles versionURIs?

 

Thx michel

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment

T: 
M: +31630381220
E: michel...@tno.nl

Location

 

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

From: topbrai...@googlegroups.com <topbrai...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch


Sent: woensdag 31 januari 2024 14:27
To: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users <topbrai...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question

 

I don't see where we have special handling of owl:versionIRI, nor is it required for anything.

Holger Knublauch

unread,
Feb 1, 2024, 2:56:49 PM2/1/24
to 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
Hi Michel,

As mentioned earlier, TopBraid does not use or support owl:versionIRI.

Holger


On 1 Feb 2024, at 3:09 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users <topbrai...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

I found:
 
quoting:
“
If O contains an ontology IRI OI and a version IRI VI, then the ontology document of O should be accessible via the IRI VI;
....
In contrast, an ontology document of an ontology that contains an ontology IRI http://www.example.com/my 1 and a version IRI http://www.example.com/my/2.0 1 should be accessible via the IRI http://www.example.com/my/2.0 1. In both cases, the ontology document should be accessible via the respective IRIs using the HTTP protocol.
“
 
can I found some explanation somewhere how tbc handles versionURIs?
 
Thx michel
 
 
Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment

Bohms, H.M. (Michel)

unread,
Feb 2, 2024, 2:52:02 AM2/2/24
to topbrai...@googlegroups.com

Ok, in that case, could you advise some work around?

 

Always publish all versions with versionURI  as base/graphURI in parallel, incl. an unversioned one redirecting to the latest version?

 

 

Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment

T: 
M: +31630381220
E: michel...@tno.nl

Location

 

 

David Price

unread,
Feb 2, 2024, 4:00:08 AM2/2/24
to 'Felix Sasaki' via TopBraid Suite Users
Hi Michel,


On 2 Feb 2024, at 07:51, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users <topbrai...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Ok, in that case, could you advise some work around?

As Holger said, TopBraid tools do not support it in any way, so we have no related best practices. 

Maybe an OWL-based forum could answer your questions? Or try a forum for OWL tools that do support it.

Cheers,
David

 
Always publish all versions with versionURI  as base/graphURI in parallel, incl. an unversioned one redirecting to the latest version?
 
 
Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages