Re: [tlaplus] tlaps example

32 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Stephan Merz

unread,
Apr 27, 2020, 9:00:18 AM4/27/20
to tla...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

for me this theorem goes through (with OBVIOUS), using the current distribution:

tlapm --version
1.4.5 (build 33809)

I'm afraid there must be a problem with your installation.

Stephan

On 27 Apr 2020, at 14:56, Alex Tim <alex.t...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello

I'm reading simple examples on tlaps


the author said
that the theorem

THEOREM Transitive == 
    ASSUME 
        NEW X \in Nat,
        NEW Y \in Nat,
        NEW Z \in Nat,
        X > Y,
        Y > Z
        PROVE X > Z + 1


can be proved automatically with

PROOF OBVIOUS

but it fails for me. Should i explicitly use a nonstandard solver i.e. CVC4?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/080a4910-f1f0-42b7-aad5-5b5cb5b10d36%40googlegroups.com.

Message has been deleted

Alex Tim

unread,
Apr 27, 2020, 3:43:09 PM4/27/20
to tla...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Stephan for your replies.
But ... Interesting obligations window shows all solvers used. No?
by the way... i've updated my ide to 1.7.0

image1.png



понедельник, 27 апреля 2020 г., 16:00:18 UTC+3 пользователь Stephan Merz написал:
Hello,

for me this theorem goes through (with OBVIOUS), using the current distribution:

tlapm --version
1.4.5 (build 33809)

I'm afraid there must be a problem with your installation.

Stephan

On 27 Apr 2020, at 14:56, Alex Tim <alex....@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello

I'm reading simple examples on tlaps


the author said
that the theorem

THEOREM Transitive == 
    ASSUME 
        NEW X \in Nat,
        NEW Y \in Nat,
        NEW Z \in Nat,
        X > Y,
        Y > Z
        PROVE X > Z + 1


can be proved automatically with

PROOF OBVIOUS

but it fails for me. Should i explicitly use a nonstandard solver i.e. CVC4?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tla...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages