--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikide...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddly...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/026d9d76-a80e-44e0-9870-4671bd857fc4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Whilst I think to keep a tiddler from refreshing is important for iframes within tiddlers. I suspect there is a work around for your situation Mat.
I will think about it and see.
I think there is a way to abstract the result of a list into a somewhat static tiddler and display that instead. A tiddler that will not be refreshed.
Regards
Tony
I think there is a way to abstract the result of a list into a somewhat static tiddler and display that instead. A tiddler that will not be refreshed.
@Jeremy, thanks for reply!BTW, what happens when tiddlers are folded? Is their content somehow removed from the tree? Should that be sufficient to solve the issue? (I'm trying to test it but my computer is currently messing with me so I can't draw conclusions.)
@TonyI think there is a way to abstract the result of a list into a somewhat static tiddler and display that instead. A tiddler that will not be refreshed.
That sounds more like a "construct" than a "temporary state". I lack the knowledge to theorize implications properly but I'm thinking it should be more economical to just "block the refresh" rather than to actually do or construct something to display alternative things...?<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikide...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddly...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/fe3ef132-ac1f-49a3-989c-316f51981b5c%40googlegroups.com.
Folded tiddlers are hidden via a reveal widget that entirely removes the content from the widget tree.
I am glad folding is enough for you.
A grander solution may be possible and the reason I have speculated on a solution is because of the reply from Jeremy.
Have you tried prerelease of late with the indexing added (hidden in core) because it improves performance.
Regards
Tony