CamelCase-Rules

51 views
Skip to first unread message

torax...@googlemail.com

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 3:46:25 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
Hi @all,

i am just try to understand, what are the conventions for CamelCase in TW? Is it a general "you've to start with a uppercase A-Z, and then there has to be a 2nd one anywhere"? Thanks for a short hint.

Cheers.

PMario

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 3:54:04 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
Hi,
As you wrote CamelCase it's exactly that. ... It depends on when you started using them.

There have been some discussions lately, if we should switch the flag for CamelCase links off by default. .. At the moment the rule is on by default.
-mario


torax...@googlemail.com

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 4:12:53 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
Hi PMario,

until now I didn't used it, but I intend too. At the moment I am overhouling my TW-template, because the earlier tries where to half hearted.

To If you can tell me the _current_ rules for 5.2.2, would be fine enought.

Thanks and cheers.

torax...@googlemail.com

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 4:23:11 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
Skimped a little bit through the discussions around this topic. Is my impression right, that this feature doesn't work as intended? It's a little bit confusing, because the topic is spread in several threads and I am not so involved in this project, like it seems neccessary.

Thanks.

strikke...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 4:46:16 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki

torax...@googlemail.com

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 4:50:37 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
It was in my old installations disabled. So I am aware of it. I simply wanted to give that feature a shot, but noticed, it works very inconsistent. So I think it's best to view it as experimental. Would be a nice feature, but I need a reliable behaviour and not the 1st time left and next time right. 😉

But thanks for the link.

PMario

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 5:08:58 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:50:37 PM UTC+2 torax...@googlemail.com wrote:
It was in my old installations disabled. So I am aware of it. I simply wanted to give that feature a shot, but noticed, it works very inconsistent.

I don't think it's inconsistent. It's a parser option and works in the exact same way as any other option like ''bold'', //italic// and so on.
 
So I think it's best to view it as experimental.

It's definitely _not_ experimental. It probably works consistently since alpha 1. Same as bold and italic ;) ...

The only thing is, that there is some discussion, if it should be ON by default. ... If you started using wikitext in the "early days" you are probably used to it.
 
Would be a nice feature, but I need a reliable behaviour and not the 1st time left and next time right. 😉

As I wrote. It is reliable.

-mario

torax...@googlemail.com

unread,
Jun 16, 2022, 5:27:02 PM6/16/22
to TiddlyWiki
That was the reason, why I asked for the rules. I couldn't figure out, under wich rules. it works. In one case it reacted even with accent-chars, on others there was no reaction at all with the mix of lower and upper case A-Z / 0-9 only…
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages