I think we need an edition for publishing and demos of people plugins and macros. This could be extended to support software in general.
If I may take this opportunity to point out the idea with Polly to use a restore method to build browser independant saving is sheer genius. However to use "restore" as a way to describe it is from my perspective not good. Why ? Because despite all the backups available to me I rarely ever need to restore. On the surface this makes Polly look like something I am unlikely to use, and this shortchanges what Polly can do.
Perhaps saving wikis from any browser without add-ons or server installs is a better description. In Polly s design restore is effectively how one saves. So I suggest calling it save and keep the word restore for the technical summary.
Regards
Tony
Perhaps saving wikis from any browser without add-ons or server installs is a better description.
However to use "restore" as a way to describe it is from my perspective not good. Why ? Because despite all the backups available to me I rarely ever need to restore.
(1) on computers associated with recovery from failure;
(2) has resonances with diseases and general ennui--"he restored himself at the goat farm"
recuperet
Pollystore
Regards
Tony
Polly "restore" is a kind of "GLEANING / GLEAN" birds (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleaning_(birds)) and humans do (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleaning). Its an activity of finding and making your own. Its perhaps not so well known, though an entire movie was made about it ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZF3VRGgxTU, a serious French activity of reclamation.
And there is "ROOST/ROOSTING", which is the resting place, a home where a bird Returns to ...
Polly ROOSTS wiki? This is a common term that conveys, well, I think, a home destination wiki return to.
I think it is worth attention.
This is also the related "PERCH/PERCHING". Wikis are perches of writing and ideas taht wander into download but find again their perch with Polly's help.