Now I see that the canonical uri field can be used to point to external files that got rendered into the TW tiddler body, I want to point to some source code files.But, I am not getting any success. The way I'm doing it is using relative paths_canonical_uri: ../../Dropbox/somewhere/file.jsI am using node.js version, maybe that is the problem? Should I use the standalone edition instead?
I have to say that I find the name of the field hard to type. I remember a pull request to add a drop-down with common fields, was it merged?
--Regards.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/535e465a-dd0f-4163-a541-3fdc4cbdcec4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Very interesting github issue. Is possible to add arbitrary routes to the server module?
Very interesting github issue. Is possible to add arbitrary routes to the server module?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c52b9975-da93-42a4-a7ad-c0db5674a392%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Is _canonical_uri supposed to work with text files? I can't get it to show a simple text file with either an absolute address (provided by tiddlysnip) nor a relative address. But it does work with absolute and relative addresses of image files.
What I mean is that the text of the text file does not show up in the _canonical_uri tiddler. I tried saving the text file in the 4 different file encodings offered by Notepad.
It wouldn't even show me a text file in the same directory as the TW file.
I could get it to work with an absolute, but not relative path to a PDF (with application/tiddler).
It's odd that advanced file formats work but not a simple text file.
Mark
TW 5.1.8, FF 33.0, Win 7
On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 8:17:47 AM UTC-7, Danielo Rodríguez wrote:Hello,Now I see that the canonical uri field can be used to point to external files that got rendered into the TW tiddler body, I want to point to some source code files.But, I am not getting any success. The way I'm doing it is using relative paths_canonical_uri: ../../Dropbox/somewhere/file.jsI am using node.js version, maybe that is the problem? Should I use the standalone edition instead?I have to say that I find the name of the field hard to type. I remember a pull request to add a drop-down with common fields, was it merged?Regards.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6db8a709-91e1-4ca8-90ec-8c170d78a15f%40googlegroups.com.
while Firefox is quite happy.The complexity of the implementation landscape is why I initially resisted adding this feature. As I feared, it's proving hard for many users to get it working because of the requirement to understand the browser limitations.
In case it wasn't clear, I was talking about reading local text files. I wouldn't think there would have to be any security restrictions against reading local files -- I can use the browser to browse to and read local text files.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e0e4755c-3199-4800-b2c1-f0743006fc88%40googlegroups.com.
I am using FIREFOX 33 with WINDOWS 7 and TW 5.1.8
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b9b6c84b-8088-438b-8dc7-52b583d3d110%40googlegroups.com.
You're right! using the text/html type works flawesly!!
Jeremy, in 5.1.10 is it supposed to work with text/plain? I'm testing and it does not work neither. I'm trying to display a bash file as plain text.
Thank you for your approach, I'll check it out