Bimlas
I like very much your comments on USAGE. How to fit use of TW to users immediate cognitive needs. The OP is a neat example. As are your several recent comments on the power and simplicity of uncomplicated linking (rather than taggery).
You are highlighting how much can be done almost effortlessly in TW. Indeed, IMO, the fundamental architecture of our tool, TW, lends itself to very elegant lightweight solutions.
Its an interesting question how much sophistication one actually needs to achieve aims?
Regarding the OP, its interesting because its "procedural" (i.e. its notes in flow to then type elsewhere or lose). That is likely very close to one very common working need--to "jot" a note as part of a wider compositional process--but also to jot a note and auto-discard it. Its the ACT of writing that can often be enough, then it enters mind, no need for it to be preserved.
FWIW, I write, on paper, about 30 notes to myself a day. 95% of them I discard soon. About 1 in a hundred I may type into a computer wiki. Its the fit between processes of finding/honing and where bothering to record them in a wiki it gets interesting. I thought the OP understood that cognitive issue well.
Best wishes
TT