--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/BOMM55Ii2_4/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/95c20b12-a430-4efe-ad17-f32c9cc369cbn%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2f485ced-2b9c-4dc7-b401-5df0a7af4c4an%40googlegroups.com.
Just thinking out loud. If the tiddler indexing code could be put in a template, then it might be possible to write a command line script that would use nodejs tiddliwiki to run a process on each wiki, collect the outputs, and rebuild the index file. This would simplify keeping the main index up-to-date.
On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 7:48:49 AM UTC-7 David Gifford wrote:There has been a lot of talk about walk-throughs ever since Soren's wonderful example.Here is one of my own. It includes BLTs (formerly L+BL), and Mohammad's SearchWikis plugin.There is a link in the Youtube description to a template to play with, and there are instructions in that template.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/95c20b12-a430-4efe-ad17-f32c9cc369cbn%40googlegroups.com.
...I use Windows, and the table in https://giffmex.org/blt/index.html#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Fkookma%2Fsearchwikis%2Fui%2Findex-summary looks good to me in both Chrome and Firefox. Does this tiddler also spill over for you?'
I am using STN and find it better, just because I am usually looking for a source or a topic when I glance at the sidebar. The important thing is being able to find a tiddler and see its contents. It shouldn't matter in which way it is related to the present tiddler...
On Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 7:50:41 AM UTC-5 ludwa6 wrote:Am really enjoying your BLTs, @David, but for one little bug in this sandwich: the "Index summary" table on "Searchwikis Index Summary" tiddler does not confine itself to the Story View, but spills over to obscure the sidebar content (tested in both TiddlyDesktop 0.0.14 and latest Chrome brower on MacOS 10.13.6).As to the STN (Source/ Topic/ Notes) variant: It is also interesting, and i am of two minds as to which i prefer: in case of a wiki that is for sharing with mainstream user(s -i mean people for whom wiki-speak is a foreign language), i think the STM paradigm will feel more intuitively usable... But for me alone, as i am just beginning to "Grok" the qualities of Backlinks, Links and Tags, and am still in process of deciding how best to use them, i guess i'll stick to the BLTs diet for now (tho i'm getting a bit worried about my blood cholesterol level already :-)/walt