Re: {Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders} For you GP Guy's...

164 views
Skip to first unread message

Daniel Davala

unread,
Jun 6, 2013, 1:52:18 PM6/6/13
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
Looks like that plan as proposed will kill the tidal portion of 4MR as well (and any chance of purging sewage overflows).  Thanks for posting this to the group.

Dan Davala

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:18 PM, <chopc...@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI...
http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/breaking_ground/2013/06/reagan-national-runway-shift-will-push.html?ana=e_wash_brk&s=newsletter&ed=2013-06-05&u=x1CD0d7mWoP/9dgZvwDtSESMJva&t=1370538955

--
http://www.tpfr.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tidal-potomac-fly-rodders/65f9d0cb-d402-42f0-8d07-45939ae5b2d8%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Rob Snowhite

unread,
Jun 6, 2013, 1:56:17 PM6/6/13
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
Looks like the orange line is just the Airport property and that the only addition is that little wedge that will stick out into the Potomac from the bottom right.
 
Rob Snowhite


From: Daniel Davala <daniel...@gmail.com>
To: tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: {Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders} For you GP Guy's...

Rich, Marek

unread,
Jun 6, 2013, 2:21:17 PM6/6/13
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com

Agree with Rob. Doesn’t look like it will impact GP at all.

Eric Y.

unread,
Jun 6, 2013, 2:22:22 PM6/6/13
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com, Rob Snowhite
I think Rob is correct. It looks like the part they're looking at filling in is the red triangle.
 

On Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:56:17 PM UTC-4, Rob Snowhite wrote:
Looks like the orange line is just the Airport property and that the only addition is that little wedge that will stick out into the Potomac from the bottom right.
 
Rob Snowhite


From: Daniel Davala <daniel...@gmail.com>
To: tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: {Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders} For you GP Guy's...
Looks like that plan as proposed will kill the tidal portion of 4MR as well (and any chance of purging sewage overflows).  Thanks for posting this to the group.

Dan Davala

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:18 PM, <chopc...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
http://www.tpfr.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-rodders+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

--
http://www.tpfr.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-rodders+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

Daniel Davala

unread,
Jun 6, 2013, 3:08:16 PM6/6/13
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
Good call guys, didn't mean to hit the panic button. 
 
Dan

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tidal-potomac-fly-rodders/d20151ec-8033-47a4-86f0-04c1410bc17a%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US.

Aden

unread,
Jun 7, 2013, 1:20:27 PM6/7/13
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
I asked around the airport the other day at work and the extension is to go into the river on the south side of the airport.  They really have no room to expand to the northwest and into roaches run.  Airplane takeoff performance and obstacle clearance on the departure end of the runway predicate the minimum runway length for air carrier operators.  There is a clearway in the departure flightpath for every runway and if an obstacle penetrates this area the runway or departure has to be changed.  I say all this just to ease the fears that gravelly point could be shut down.  They would have to move buildings to build the runway to the northwest.  

AIR CARRIER OBSTACLE

CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS

Regulations require that large transport category turbine

powered airplanes certificated after September 30,

1958, be taken off at a weight that allows a net takeoff

flightpath (one engine inoperative) that clears all obstacles

either by a height of at least 35 feet vertically, or by at least

200 feet horizontally within the airport boundaries and by

at least 300 feet horizontally after passing the boundaries.

The takeoff flightpath is considered to begin 35 feet above

the takeoff surface at the end of the takeoff distance, and

extends to a point in the takeoff at which the airplane is

1,500 feet above the takeoff surface, or at which the

transition from the takeoff to the enroute configuration is

completed. The net takeoff flightpath is the actual takeoff

flightpath reduced at each point by 0.8 percent for twoengine

airplanes, 0.9 percent for three-engine airplanes,

and 1.0 percent for four-engine airplanes.





 They will more than likely use EMAS on the departure end of 33




Wow, I must be stuck inside with all the rain instead of fishing haha
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages