Divide and Conquer the Synthesis of Electrical Watts
Vinyasi
I have to thank several people who have made this post possible...
C. Earl Amman, Nikola Tesla, Joseph Newman, Eric Dollard, Byron Brubaker, boguslaw, Slovenia, etc.
In my analysis of the Newman device,
it becomes apparent that he has succeeded in dividing up his circuit
into two sources each equally specialized in its domain. The battery
pack specializes in delivering a constant voltage to Newman's massive
copper coil wherein the coil is acting as a blender synthesizing
electricity from the voltage coming from the batteries and the current
coming from the rotating magnetic field of the permanent bar magnets in
the center of the coil. The voltage is reused while the current is
drained. Since the voltage is not drained (appreciably), the voltage
maintains the spin of the rotating magnetic field regardless of the
drainage of current. So, we have two separate subsystems synthesizing
mechanical advantage (in as much as there's more force and spin rate as
the device warms up to its operating speed long after Newman gives it a
push start with his hand).
We're told that Tesla installed an aerial at the back of the
Pierce-Arrow. But what about the aerial already there servicing the
radio? What if these two aerials became part of the circuit in a manner
similar to the placement of two bronze hollow spheres - one over each
headlight - in C. Earl Amman's EV?
Eric says that electricity can be synthesized. {Somewhere, Eric says that varying an electrostatic field in which is immersed a magnetic field will synthesize electricity. Varying the capacitor's value, in this simulation, up and down repeatedly, does just that to the magnetic field inside the transformer.}
We're also told by conventional wisdom that energy IN must equal energy OUT. If by energy, we mean Watts, and if voltage is reused rather than spent, then I don't violate anything by creating or destroying current (amps). This I do, in the following circuit ...
... in which the voltage on the antenna/s has no behavioral relation to its current/amperage.
| BTW, the second capacitor to satisfy Eric's analog computer in either TEM mode or LMD mode is implied by the flow of air at a perpendicular between the two antennas in this simulation and between the two bronze spheres in C. Earl Amman's EV. |
| Another BTW, I made what appears to me now an oversight in which I'm just assuming that this circuit is in LMD mode when it may be both TEM and LMD. The battery charges the circuit in TEM (in the beginning of the circuit's operation) while the air flow between the antennas suggests LMD. |
Tesla invented variable, vacuum tube capacitors and filed for a patent in 1896 but apparently never received any patent for his invention. Yet, one year prior to his death (in 1943), this invention became commercially available.
The operating manual for the circuit simulation, above, is here ...
http://is.gd/oprman
... intended to satisfy this video ...
https://is.gd/capbatt
... and Wikipedia article ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_source
The operating manual is included here ...
https://is.gd/piercearrowplaylist
Vinyasi
Vinyasi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuFhFnUkuak
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZlUzQo670U -- duplicate
Synthesize Electricity in a Power Supply by Reusing its Voltage and Amplifying its Current
https://youtu.be/0wPtq4nMeQ0
https://youtu.be/dwjOmwOfhuk -- duplicate
===================================
http://is.gd/parametricbuzz
http://is.gd/currsors
http://is.gd/cursors
http://is.gd/coldstart1s
http://is.gd/coldstart1scmf
http://is.gd/syncur1s
http://is.gd/syncur1scmf
http://is.gd/coldstart2s
http://is.gd/coldstart2scmf
http://is.gd/syncur2s
http://is.gd/syncur2scmf
https://is.gd/divcon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_source
https://is.gd/capbatt
http://is.gd/oprman
http://www.energeticforum.com/73799-post24.html
https://is.gd/defineparametricbuzz
https://is.gd/mijuna
https://is.gd/eximuf
https://is.gd/uvaxaj
https://is.gd/giniwu
https://is.gd/belltech
https://is.gd/eqseres
Electric Paradigm - Parametric Excitations of a Capacitor Synthesizes Electricity
https://youtu.be/2hoXg14vP6Y
https://youtu.be/t25inqKzLaU -- duplicate
Simulated parametric excitation of a capacitor: downwards yields more volts; a return back upwards yields more current. Cool! Eric Dollard and Chris Carson were right!
http://is.gd/electricparadigm
http://is.gd/electricalparadigm
http://is.gd/electricparadigmprecharged
http://is.gd/explainpe - technical
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/texts/Parametric%20Excitation/
https://is.gd/FerdinandCap
Vinyasi
Vinyasi
There's a new twist to this mysterious tale. Sangulani Maxwell
Chikumbutso claims the use of a secret parametric metamaterial. What is
it? I don't know, but a strong candidate could be the aether via
parametric capacitance. And the best way to negotiate with the aether
may be through the use of silica. My reasoning is backwards....
Since
quartz crystal oscillators can be either tweaked with pulsed voltage to
vibrate themselves, and they can be mechanically squeezed to elicit
voltage pulses, and ...
Since silica can be tweaked with sunlight to produce voltage differences in solar panels, then ...
What if silica can be tweaked with voltage to alter its dimensions and thus alter its capacitance?
It didn't take long to find inferential information online to verify my suspicions...
http://tinyurl.com/solarosc
... after I had already designed another parametric circuit simulation to put Sangulani in perspective...
http://is.gd/parametricsangulani
To me and my way of thinking, this business of so-called 'free energy' research has become too simple to ignore. Yet, I know why conventional opinion ignores it. It's due to fear of many things. I think people get into the electrical engineering business because it's geared as a palliative to calm people down with platitudes, such as: energy IN has to equal energy OUT. That's fine, but the constituent ingredients of electrical energy are reusable. So, yeah, it costs some artifice of intelligence to create a condition in which electrical energy can be synthesized from, or decomposed into, its constituent ingredients of: magnetism, electrostatic charges varied over time. But magnetism only deteriorates with the natural aging process of magnets. And voltage, electron volts, of electrostatics is reusable if we never drain a voltage source with the intention of converting it into current, but instead borrow that voltage and quickly give it back. So, magnetism and electrostatics are free. It's the electricity we make from these free ingredients which makes electricity -- for all intents and purposes -- free as well.
The caveat to inductive parametrics is that it is not conducive to gainful acquisition of free energy. Yet, capacitant parametrics is.
And electricity can't be synthesized without the assistance of inductance (magnetism) since this ingredient provides resistance of various types the most notable ones being: positive versus negative resistances. But magnetism also provides us with back EMF and the collapse of a magnetic field which are also sources of resistance (impedance). Without inductive resistance, current couldn't form from negative resistance. So what if its flipside is positive resistance? Resistance is not black and white. It tends to come mixed, or blended, so that a certain portion is positive resistance while the remaining portion is negative. And sometimes one predominates over the other, while in other instances the inverse is true.
But it's the dielectric material of the capacitor which communicates with the aether making synthesis or decomposition of electricity possible provided a few simple rules are followed...
Rule #0 -- Synthesis versus Decomposition is a statistical phenomenon in as much as I don't get to see the wave forms to synchronize my manual administration of parametric variance at the right moment of a wave's phase angle from baseline on the oscilloscope tracings. This business is not unlike pushing or pulling a child on a swing. In fact, many of the articles posted here...
http://is.gd/paratexts
... describe just that. So, "winging it" by chance while operating my parametric simulations is largely a gamble. And I can improve my chances for the synthesis of electricity if I follow certain rules of thumb. And if I want the opposite result, namely: the decomposition of electricity (not the same as thermodynamic losses or conversions), then I should do the opposite of these rules of thumb.
Rule #1 -- Do not sweep a parametric alteration with a smooth, gradual transition. It must be a drastic, sudden jump down and likewise upwards.
Rule #2 -- The range of parametric alteration of capacitance should be high enough from a cold start to improve statistical chances for synthesis to occur. The maximum should be 10 Farads. The minimum can be as high as 10 milli Farads, or it can be anything less than this for even greater performance. But once sufficient electrical momentum gets going of a sufficiently high wattage, the maximum and minimum can be reduced and their spread (or, difference between them) can be shrunk. But this sort of momentum is of a level far in excess to common need by our devices. Only a power plant servicing entire neighborhoods or small towns need consider this last principle. Although, this may be the only way to do this -- is to do this, not merely for one's self, but also for others near at hand. Eric Dollard warned us in this regard: that the synthesis of electricity is possible only if done on a scale similar to an electrical substation of our power grid, namely: on par with 500 kva output. I don't know this for sure. Richard Hackenberger of the EV Gray team had this problem of how to dispose of their excess energy generated beyond the need of an EV motor. But what did Tesla do during his 1931 demonstration? Did he have the same problem as well and solve it in a similar fashion? By converting excess electrical energy into ionization of the surrounding air?