[v5.15] possible deadlock in mdc800_device_open

0 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Aug 17, 2026, 3:40:35 AM (22 hours ago) Aug 17
to syzkaller...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: aabd761612db Linux 5.15.215
git tree: linux-5.15.y
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13ba2679580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f161cbc9aef65db0
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1050c0099ec5bfe7ee4e
compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.8 (++20260613092233+e80beda6e255-1~exp1~20260613092250.77), Debian LLD 22.1.8

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f636f56d3662/disk-aabd7616.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1a46620f40c/vmlinux-aabd7616.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9b78bb48b022/bzImage-aabd7616.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+1050c0...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.2.38/4388 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888148262220 (&mdc800->io_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdc800_device_open+0x2a/0x430 drivers/usb/image/mdc800.c:611

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8cdbb3d0 (minor_rwsem#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: usb_open+0x2c/0x300 drivers/usb/core/file.c:39

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (minor_rwsem#2){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x38/0x60 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1551
usb_register_dev+0x2a3/0x7f0 drivers/usb/core/file.c:187
mdc800_usb_probe+0xf8a/0x1870 drivers/usb/image/mdc800.c:485
usb_probe_interface+0x5be/0xae0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:396
call_driver_probe drivers/base/dd.c:-1 [inline]
really_probe+0x276/0xc70 drivers/base/dd.c:595
__driver_probe_device+0x1f5/0x390 drivers/base/dd.c:775
driver_probe_device+0x4f/0x420 drivers/base/dd.c:805
__device_attach_driver+0x2b0/0x500 drivers/base/dd.c:927
bus_for_each_drv+0x184/0x210 drivers/base/bus.c:429
__device_attach+0x2a7/0x480 drivers/base/dd.c:999
bus_probe_device+0xba/0x1d0 drivers/base/bus.c:489
device_add+0xbcf/0x1050 drivers/base/core.c:3427
usb_set_configuration+0x19d5/0x2030 drivers/usb/core/message.c:2223
usb_generic_driver_probe+0x89/0x150 drivers/usb/core/generic.c:238
usb_probe_device+0x126/0x250 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:293
call_driver_probe drivers/base/dd.c:-1 [inline]
really_probe+0x276/0xc70 drivers/base/dd.c:595
__driver_probe_device+0x1f5/0x390 drivers/base/dd.c:775
driver_probe_device+0x4f/0x420 drivers/base/dd.c:805
__device_attach_driver+0x2b0/0x500 drivers/base/dd.c:927
bus_for_each_drv+0x184/0x210 drivers/base/bus.c:429
__device_attach+0x2a7/0x480 drivers/base/dd.c:999
bus_probe_device+0xba/0x1d0 drivers/base/bus.c:489
device_add+0xbcf/0x1050 drivers/base/core.c:3427
usb_new_device+0x9f6/0x15d0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:2632
hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5497 [inline]
hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5637 [inline]
port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5799 [inline]
hub_event+0x2b8d/0x5260 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5881
process_one_work+0x867/0xff0 kernel/workqueue.c:2310
worker_thread+0xad7/0x12a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2457
kthread+0x42e/0x520 kernel/kthread.c:334
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:287

-> #0 (&mdc800->io_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2c66/0x7b50 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012
lock_acquire+0x19e/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623
__mutex_lock_common+0x1e5/0x2400 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743
mdc800_device_open+0x2a/0x430 drivers/usb/image/mdc800.c:611
usb_open+0x1fe/0x300 drivers/usb/core/file.c:48
chrdev_open+0x585/0x5f0 fs/char_dev.c:414
do_dentry_open+0x7f7/0xf90 fs/open.c:826
do_open fs/namei.c:3616 [inline]
path_openat+0x2718/0x2fb0 fs/namei.c:3750
do_filp_open+0x1df/0x400 fs/namei.c:3777
do_sys_openat2+0x14b/0x500 fs/open.c:1255
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1271 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1287 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1282 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x135/0x160 fs/open.c:1282
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(minor_rwsem#2);
lock(&mdc800->io_lock);
lock(minor_rwsem#2);
lock(&mdc800->io_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.2.38/4388:
#0: ffffffff8cdbb3d0 (minor_rwsem#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: usb_open+0x2c/0x300 drivers/usb/core/file.c:39

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 4388 Comm: syz.2.38 Not tainted syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/24/2026
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x188/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x296/0x330 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2c66/0x7b50 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5012
lock_acquire+0x19e/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5623
__mutex_lock_common+0x1e5/0x2400 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743
mdc800_device_open+0x2a/0x430 drivers/usb/image/mdc800.c:611
usb_open+0x1fe/0x300 drivers/usb/core/file.c:48
chrdev_open+0x585/0x5f0 fs/char_dev.c:414
do_dentry_open+0x7f7/0xf90 fs/open.c:826
do_open fs/namei.c:3616 [inline]
path_openat+0x2718/0x2fb0 fs/namei.c:3750
do_filp_open+0x1df/0x400 fs/namei.c:3777
do_sys_openat2+0x14b/0x500 fs/open.c:1255
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1271 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1287 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1282 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x135/0x160 fs/open.c:1282
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x66/0xd0
RIP: 0033:0x7f4047f5690e
Code: 08 0f 85 a5 a8 ff ff 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 08
RSP: 002b:00007f40461ccb28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f40461cd6c0 RCX: 00007f4047f5690e
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00007f40461ccc00 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c
RBP: 00007f404802d024 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f404821e128 R14: 00007f404821e090 R15: 00007ffcfca5a378
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

syzbot

unread,
Aug 17, 2026, 3:59:28 AM (22 hours ago) Aug 17
to syzkaller...@googlegroups.com
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit: aabd761612db Linux 5.15.215
git tree: linux-5.15.y
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13acd949580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f161cbc9aef65db0
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1050c0099ec5bfe7ee4e
compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.8 (++20260613092233+e80beda6e255-1~exp1~20260613092250.77), Debian LLD 22.1.8
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=11a7da79580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13e3fa79580000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f636f56d3662/disk-aabd7616.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f1a46620f40c/vmlinux-aabd7616.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9b78bb48b022/bzImage-aabd7616.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+1050c0...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.17/4439 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888023f2fa20 (&mdc800->io_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdc800_device_open+0x2a/0x430 drivers/usb/image/mdc800.c:611
1 lock held by syz.0.17/4439:
#0: ffffffff8cdbb3d0 (minor_rwsem#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: usb_open+0x2c/0x300 drivers/usb/core/file.c:39

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4439 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0
RIP: 0033:0x7fec7eb7b90e
Code: 08 0f 85 a5 a8 ff ff 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 08
RSP: 002b:00007ffc490d6078 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055555cea3500 RCX: 00007fec7eb7b90e
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00007ffc490d6150 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c
RBP: 00007fec7ec52024 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fec7ee42fac R14: 00007fec7ee42fa0 R15: 00007fec7ee42fa0
</TASK>


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages