[v6.1] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in diAlloc

0 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Nov 10, 2023, 3:05:31 AM11/10/23
to syzkaller...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: fb2635ac69ab Linux 6.1.62
git tree: linux-6.1.y
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=114b5797680000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d1540e3da5e5623f
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c506cdc4bf10a899b249
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1bcbea336c80/disk-fb2635ac.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/859797d77ed0/vmlinux-fb2635ac.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/acd7a084757b/bzImage-fb2635ac.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c506cd...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

loop5: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
================================================================================
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1360:19
index -878706688 is out of range for type 'atomic_t[128]'
CPU: 0 PID: 30494 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.1.62-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/09/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2cb lib/dump_stack.c:106
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:151 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x118/0x140 lib/ubsan.c:282
diAlloc+0x1459/0x1720 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1360
ialloc+0x8b/0x970 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56
jfs_create+0x1ba/0xbb0 fs/jfs/namei.c:92
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3414 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3482 [inline]
path_openat+0x12f1/0x2e60 fs/namei.c:3712
do_filp_open+0x230/0x480 fs/namei.c:3742
do_sys_openat2+0x13b/0x500 fs/open.c:1318
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1334 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1350 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1345 [inline]
__x64_sys_openat+0x243/0x290 fs/open.c:1345
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f6a10c7cae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f6a11a8e0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6a10d9bf80 RCX: 00007f6a10c7cae9
RDX: 000000000000275a RSI: 00000000200010c0 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c
RBP: 00007f6a10cc847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f6a10d9bf80 R15: 00007ffc0ed6ec78
</TASK>
================================================================================


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

syzbot

unread,
Mar 6, 2024, 10:48:17 PMMar 6
to syzkaller...@googlegroups.com
Auto-closing this bug as obsolete.
Crashes did not happen for a while, no reproducer and no activity.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages