[syzbot] [block?] possible deadlock in bdev_release (2)
0 views
Skip to first unread message
syzbot
9:36 AM (2 hours ago) 9:36 AM
to ax...@kernel.dk, linux...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: c1ecb239fa34 Add linux-next specific files for 20260522
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=153a947e580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=77a9211ff284de54
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2f62807dc3239b8f584e
compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4cb88c910144/disk-c1ecb239.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4a9bc938cf88/vmlinux-c1ecb239.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/684f1e33f264/bzImage-c1ecb239.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+2f6280...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Tainted: G L
------------------------------------------------------
udevd/5769 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805ecd4938 ((wq_completion)loop4){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xb5/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:4033
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802674c4c8 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bdev_release+0x1af/0x660 block/bdev.c:1136
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #5 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
bdev_open+0xe0/0xcc0 block/bdev.c:953
bdev_file_open_by_dev+0x1be/0x240 block/bdev.c:1067
swsusp_check+0x56/0x490 kernel/power/swap.c:1571
software_resume+0x51/0x4c0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1023
resume_store+0x333/0x4f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1307
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b0/0x540 fs/kernfs/file.c:352
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline]
vfs_write+0x629/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:688
ksys_write+0x156/0x270 fs/read_write.c:740
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
lock_system_sleep+0x49/0x70 kernel/power/main.c:71
resume_store+0x2ff/0x4f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1300
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b0/0x540 fs/kernfs/file.c:352
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline]
vfs_write+0x629/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:688
ksys_write+0x156/0x270 fs/read_write.c:740
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #3 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
kernfs_seq_start+0x5c/0x420 fs/kernfs/file.c:172
traverse+0x164/0x580 fs/seq_file.c:107
seq_read_iter+0xd09/0xe20 fs/seq_file.c:196
lo_rw_aio+0xc80/0xf00 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:-1
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:435 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:1941 [inline]
loop_process_work+0x92a/0x11b0 drivers/block/loop.c:1976
process_one_work+0x98b/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3318
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3401 [inline]
worker_thread+0xb49/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3482
kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #2 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
seq_read_iter+0xb8/0xe20 fs/seq_file.c:183
lo_rw_aio+0xc80/0xf00 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:-1
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:435 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:1941 [inline]
loop_process_work+0x92a/0x11b0 drivers/block/loop.c:1976
process_one_work+0x98b/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3318
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3401 [inline]
worker_thread+0xb49/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3482
kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #1 ((work_completion)(&worker->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
process_one_work+0x8d7/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3294
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3401 [inline]
worker_thread+0xb49/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3482
kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop4){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3167 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3286 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3910 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2d10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5239
lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xcb/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:4033
__flush_workqueue+0x14b/0x14f0 kernel/workqueue.c:4075
drain_workqueue+0xd3/0x390 kernel/workqueue.c:4239
__loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1130 [inline]
lo_release+0x287/0x8f0 drivers/block/loop.c:1767
bdev_release+0x541/0x660 block/bdev.c:-1
blkdev_release+0x15/0x20 block/fops.c:705
__fput+0x461/0xa70 fs/file_table.c:510
fput_close_sync+0x11f/0x240 fs/file_table.c:615
__do_sys_close fs/open.c:1511 [inline]
__se_sys_close fs/open.c:1496 [inline]
__x64_sys_close+0x7e/0x110 fs/open.c:1496
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
(wq_completion)loop4 --> system_transition_mutex --> &disk->open_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock(system_transition_mutex);
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock((wq_completion)loop4);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by udevd/5769:
#0: ffff88802674c4c8 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bdev_release+0x1af/0x660 block/bdev.c:1136
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5769 Comm: udevd Tainted: G L syzkaller #0 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)}
Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/18/2026
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2045
check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3167 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3286 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3910 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2d10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5239
lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xcb/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:4033
__flush_workqueue+0x14b/0x14f0 kernel/workqueue.c:4075
drain_workqueue+0xd3/0x390 kernel/workqueue.c:4239
__loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1130 [inline]
lo_release+0x287/0x8f0 drivers/block/loop.c:1767
bdev_release+0x541/0x660 block/bdev.c:-1
blkdev_release+0x15/0x20 block/fops.c:705
__fput+0x461/0xa70 fs/file_table.c:510
fput_close_sync+0x11f/0x240 fs/file_table.c:615
__do_sys_close fs/open.c:1511 [inline]
__se_sys_close fs/open.c:1496 [inline]
__x64_sys_close+0x7e/0x110 fs/open.c:1496
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f836530a407
Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 <5b> c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 de e8 23 ff ff ff
RSP: 002b:00007ffd5e8529c0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f836521c880 RCX: 00007f836530a407
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000008
RBP: 00007f836521c6e8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 000055c60f674190 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: 000055c60f683f10
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: c1ecb239fa34 Add linux-next specific files for 20260522
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=153a947e580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=77a9211ff284de54
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2f62807dc3239b8f584e
compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4cb88c910144/disk-c1ecb239.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4a9bc938cf88/vmlinux-c1ecb239.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/684f1e33f264/bzImage-c1ecb239.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+2f6280...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Tainted: G L
------------------------------------------------------
udevd/5769 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805ecd4938 ((wq_completion)loop4){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xb5/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:4033
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802674c4c8 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bdev_release+0x1af/0x660 block/bdev.c:1136
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #5 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
bdev_open+0xe0/0xcc0 block/bdev.c:953
bdev_file_open_by_dev+0x1be/0x240 block/bdev.c:1067
swsusp_check+0x56/0x490 kernel/power/swap.c:1571
software_resume+0x51/0x4c0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1023
resume_store+0x333/0x4f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1307
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b0/0x540 fs/kernfs/file.c:352
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline]
vfs_write+0x629/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:688
ksys_write+0x156/0x270 fs/read_write.c:740
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
lock_system_sleep+0x49/0x70 kernel/power/main.c:71
resume_store+0x2ff/0x4f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1300
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b0/0x540 fs/kernfs/file.c:352
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline]
vfs_write+0x629/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:688
ksys_write+0x156/0x270 fs/read_write.c:740
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #3 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
kernfs_seq_start+0x5c/0x420 fs/kernfs/file.c:172
traverse+0x164/0x580 fs/seq_file.c:107
seq_read_iter+0xd09/0xe20 fs/seq_file.c:196
lo_rw_aio+0xc80/0xf00 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:-1
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:435 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:1941 [inline]
loop_process_work+0x92a/0x11b0 drivers/block/loop.c:1976
process_one_work+0x98b/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3318
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3401 [inline]
worker_thread+0xb49/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3482
kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #2 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:559 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x1d0 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:578
seq_read_iter+0xb8/0xe20 fs/seq_file.c:183
lo_rw_aio+0xc80/0xf00 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:-1
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:435 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:1941 [inline]
loop_process_work+0x92a/0x11b0 drivers/block/loop.c:1976
process_one_work+0x98b/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3318
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3401 [inline]
worker_thread+0xb49/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3482
kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #1 ((work_completion)(&worker->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
process_one_work+0x8d7/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:3294
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3401 [inline]
worker_thread+0xb49/0x1140 kernel/workqueue.c:3482
kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436
ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop4){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3167 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3286 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3910 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2d10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5239
lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xcb/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:4033
__flush_workqueue+0x14b/0x14f0 kernel/workqueue.c:4075
drain_workqueue+0xd3/0x390 kernel/workqueue.c:4239
__loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1130 [inline]
lo_release+0x287/0x8f0 drivers/block/loop.c:1767
bdev_release+0x541/0x660 block/bdev.c:-1
blkdev_release+0x15/0x20 block/fops.c:705
__fput+0x461/0xa70 fs/file_table.c:510
fput_close_sync+0x11f/0x240 fs/file_table.c:615
__do_sys_close fs/open.c:1511 [inline]
__se_sys_close fs/open.c:1496 [inline]
__x64_sys_close+0x7e/0x110 fs/open.c:1496
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
(wq_completion)loop4 --> system_transition_mutex --> &disk->open_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock(system_transition_mutex);
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock((wq_completion)loop4);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by udevd/5769:
#0: ffff88802674c4c8 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bdev_release+0x1af/0x660 block/bdev.c:1136
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5769 Comm: udevd Tainted: G L syzkaller #0 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)}
Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/18/2026
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2045
check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3167 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3286 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3910 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a5/0x2d10 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5239
lock_acquire+0x106/0x350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xcb/0x180 kernel/workqueue.c:4033
__flush_workqueue+0x14b/0x14f0 kernel/workqueue.c:4075
drain_workqueue+0xd3/0x390 kernel/workqueue.c:4239
__loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1130 [inline]
lo_release+0x287/0x8f0 drivers/block/loop.c:1767
bdev_release+0x541/0x660 block/bdev.c:-1
blkdev_release+0x15/0x20 block/fops.c:705
__fput+0x461/0xa70 fs/file_table.c:510
fput_close_sync+0x11f/0x240 fs/file_table.c:615
__do_sys_close fs/open.c:1511 [inline]
__se_sys_close fs/open.c:1496 [inline]
__x64_sys_close+0x7e/0x110 fs/open.c:1496
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x560 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f836530a407
Code: 48 89 fa 4c 89 df e8 38 aa 00 00 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 1a 5b c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 44 24 10 0f 05 <5b> c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 de e8 23 ff ff ff
RSP: 002b:00007ffd5e8529c0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f836521c880 RCX: 00007f836530a407
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000008
RBP: 00007f836521c6e8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 000055c60f674190 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: 000055c60f683f10
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages