[syzbot] [iommu?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in iommufd_ioas_iova_ranges

14 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Oct 25, 2023, 9:11:03 AM10/25/23
to io...@lists.linux.dev, j...@ziepe.ca, jo...@8bytes.org, kevin...@intel.com, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, robin....@arm.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, wi...@kernel.org
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: c3200081020d Merge tag 'block-6.6-2023-10-20' of git://git..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15013471680000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=849fe52ba7c6d78a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=45f6cae2ca8c1f71e529
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/caa5c1eed3ec/disk-c3200081.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7990a3a9f71e/vmlinux-c3200081.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/015551ac9acc/bzImage-c3200081.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+45f6ca...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0xb3/0x690 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1342
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880283c9068 by task syz-executor.2/30372

CPU: 1 PID: 30372 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6-syzkaller-00244-gc3200081020d #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/06/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:364 [inline]
print_report+0x163/0x540 mm/kasan/report.c:475
kasan_report+0x175/0x1b0 mm/kasan/report.c:588
__up_read+0xb3/0x690 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1342
iommufd_put_object drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h:149 [inline]
iommufd_ioas_iova_ranges+0x5bc/0x6e0 drivers/iommu/iommufd/ioas.c:108
iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x4c2/0x580 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:398
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f5c74a7cae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f5c7582b0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5c74b9c120 RCX: 00007f5c74a7cae9
RDX: 00000000200000c0 RSI: 0000000000003b84 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f5c74ac847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f5c74b9c120 R15: 00007fffc5056178
</TASK>

Allocated by task 30371:
kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:45 [inline]
kasan_set_track+0x4f/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:52
____kasan_kmalloc mm/kasan/common.c:374 [inline]
__kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:383
kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:198 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:1026 [inline]
__kmalloc+0xb9/0x230 mm/slab_common.c:1039
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:603 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:720 [inline]
_iommufd_object_alloc+0x26/0x1c0 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:40
iommufd_ioas_alloc drivers/iommu/iommufd/ioas.c:27 [inline]
iommufd_ioas_alloc_ioctl+0xa9/0x300 drivers/iommu/iommufd/ioas.c:46
iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x4c2/0x580 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:398
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Freed by task 30368:
kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:45 [inline]
kasan_set_track+0x4f/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:52
kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 mm/kasan/generic.c:522
____kasan_slab_free+0xd6/0x120 mm/kasan/common.c:236
kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:164 [inline]
slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1800 [inline]
slab_free_freelist_hook mm/slub.c:1826 [inline]
slab_free mm/slub.c:3809 [inline]
__kmem_cache_free+0x25f/0x3b0 mm/slub.c:3822
iommufd_destroy+0x31d/0x370 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:216
iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x4c2/0x580 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:398
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880283c9000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-cg-1k of size 1024
The buggy address is located 104 bytes inside of
freed 1024-byte region [ffff8880283c9000, ffff8880283c9400)

The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page:ffffea0000a0f200 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x283c8
head:ffffea0000a0f200 order:3 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
memcg:ffff88807617ff01
flags: 0xfff00000000840(slab|head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
page_type: 0xffffffff()
raw: 00fff00000000840 ffff88801284f280 dead000000000100 dead000000000122
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080100010 00000001ffffffff ffff88807617ff01
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
page_owner tracks the page as allocated
page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x1d20c0(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC|__GFP_HARDWALL), pid 27781, tgid 27767 (syz-executor.5), ts 2835959749777, free_ts 2828040563896
set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:31 [inline]
post_alloc_hook+0x1e6/0x210 mm/page_alloc.c:1536
prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:1543 [inline]
get_page_from_freelist+0x31db/0x3360 mm/page_alloc.c:3170
__alloc_pages+0x255/0x670 mm/page_alloc.c:4426
alloc_slab_page+0x6a/0x160 mm/slub.c:1870
allocate_slab mm/slub.c:2017 [inline]
new_slab+0x84/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:2070
___slab_alloc+0xc85/0x1310 mm/slub.c:3223
__slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3322 [inline]
__slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3375 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3468 [inline]
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1af/0x270 mm/slub.c:3517
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:1025 [inline]
__kmalloc+0xa8/0x230 mm/slab_common.c:1039
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:603 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:720 [inline]
_iommufd_object_alloc+0x26/0x1c0 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:40
iommufd_ioas_alloc drivers/iommu/iommufd/ioas.c:27 [inline]
iommufd_ioas_alloc_ioctl+0xa9/0x300 drivers/iommu/iommufd/ioas.c:46
iommufd_fops_ioctl+0x4c2/0x580 drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:398
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
page last free stack trace:
reset_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:24 [inline]
free_pages_prepare mm/page_alloc.c:1136 [inline]
free_unref_page_prepare+0x8c3/0x9f0 mm/page_alloc.c:2312
free_unref_page+0x37/0x3f0 mm/page_alloc.c:2405
__slab_free+0x2f6/0x390 mm/slub.c:3715
qlink_free mm/kasan/quarantine.c:166 [inline]
qlist_free_all+0x75/0xe0 mm/kasan/quarantine.c:185
kasan_quarantine_reduce+0x14b/0x160 mm/kasan/quarantine.c:292
__kasan_slab_alloc+0x23/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:305
kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:188 [inline]
slab_post_alloc_hook+0x67/0x3d0 mm/slab.h:762
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x141/0x270 mm/slub.c:3517
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slab_common.c:1025 [inline]
__kmalloc+0xa8/0x230 mm/slab_common.c:1039
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:603 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:720 [inline]
tomoyo_encode2 security/tomoyo/realpath.c:45 [inline]
tomoyo_encode+0x26f/0x530 security/tomoyo/realpath.c:80
tomoyo_path_perm+0x3ca/0x730 security/tomoyo/file.c:831
tomoyo_path_symlink+0xde/0x120 security/tomoyo/tomoyo.c:211
security_path_symlink+0xdd/0x130 security/security.c:1786
do_symlinkat+0x136/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4505
__do_sys_symlinkat fs/namei.c:4523 [inline]
__se_sys_symlinkat fs/namei.c:4520 [inline]
__x64_sys_symlinkat+0x99/0xb0 fs/namei.c:4520
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80

Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff8880283c8f00: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
ffff8880283c8f80: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>ffff8880283c9000: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
ffff8880283c9080: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff8880283c9100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Jason Gunthorpe

unread,
Oct 25, 2023, 2:32:23 PM10/25/23
to syzbot, io...@lists.linux.dev, jo...@8bytes.org, kevin...@intel.com, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, robin....@arm.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, wi...@kernel.org
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:11:01AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: c3200081020d Merge tag 'block-6.6-2023-10-20' of git://git..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15013471680000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=849fe52ba7c6d78a
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=45f6cae2ca8c1f71e529
> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/caa5c1eed3ec/disk-c3200081.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7990a3a9f71e/vmlinux-c3200081.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/015551ac9acc/bzImage-c3200081.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+45f6ca...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __up_read+0xb3/0x690 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1342
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880283c9068 by task syz-executor.2/30372

Oh *ugh* I knew about this limitation once and forgot about it
apparently.

CPU 0 CPU1
down_read()
up_read()
down_write()
up_write()
kfree()
[..]
tail portion of up_read()

I suppose the rwsem should be turned into a refcount and completion

Jason

Hillf Danton

unread,
Oct 26, 2023, 7:05:23 AM10/26/23
to Jason Gunthorpe, syzbot, io...@lists.linux.dev, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, robin....@arm.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, wi...@kernel.org
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:32:20 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca>
The line [1] syzbot caught is before preempt is disabled, so no lock is
released yet, and the report is a simple uaf with nothing to do with
down_write().
With this report put aside, after the atomic operation in __up_read(),
sem is longer touched without waiter detected, so the refcount and
completion could not be proposed without a hoofed skull.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/locking/rwsem.c?id=c3200081020d#n1342

Jason Gunthorpe

unread,
Oct 26, 2023, 7:41:12 AM10/26/23
to Hillf Danton, syzbot, io...@lists.linux.dev, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, robin....@arm.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, wi...@kernel.org
So? It is SMP.

> so no lock is released yet, and the report is a simple uaf with
> nothing to do with down_write().

down_write() is one of the concurrent paths toward kfree.

tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
^^^^ This allows the down_write to proceed to kfree

DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(tmp < 0, sem);
if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
clear_nonspinnable(sem);
rwsem_wake(sem);
}

And so if we are unlucky we can UAF someplace in this latter part.

Actually, this is a problem but it is not this problem since the sybot
traces don't show it going down the down_write side

I guess this is still just problems with the iommufd_object_remove,
since put is ordered

refcount_dec(&obj->users);
up_read(&obj->destroy_rwsem);

And remove doesn't touch the destroy_rwsem so it simple UAFs anywhere
in up_read and that matches the syzcaller trace of concurrent destroy

Jason

Hillf Danton

unread,
Oct 27, 2023, 8:54:36 AM10/27/23
to Jason Gunthorpe, syzbot, io...@lists.linux.dev, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, robin....@arm.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, Waiman Long, wi...@kernel.org
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:41:08 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca>
Hm ... let me work it out.

__up_read(&foo->sem) rwsem_down_write_slowpath(&foo->sem)
=== ===
rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter);
atomic_long_or(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);

tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {

if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, &waiter)) {
/* ACQUIRE on success */
...
up_write(&foo->sem);
kfree(foo);
}

clear_nonspinnable(sem); <-- UAF
rwsem_wake(sem);
}

Sigh ... the race between up_read() and down_write() exists.

Fix it by moving setting RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS to rwsem_try_write_lock().
Only for thoughts.

--- x/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ y/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -606,6 +606,8 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
{
struct rwsem_waiter *first = rwsem_first_waiter(sem);
long count, new;
+ bool single = list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list);
+ bool set_hoff;

lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);

@@ -613,6 +615,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
do {
bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);

+ set_hoff = true;
if (has_handoff) {
/*
* Honor handoff bit and yield only when the first
@@ -631,20 +634,29 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
* if it is an RT task or wait in the wait queue
* for too long.
*/
- if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
- !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)))
+ if (has_handoff)
return false;
-
- new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+ if (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
+ !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)) {
+ if (!single)
+ return false;
+ if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)
+ return false;
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
+ set_hoff = false;
+ } else {
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+ if (single)
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
+ }
} else {
new |= RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED;
new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
-
- if (list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
- new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
}
} while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new));

+ if (!set_hoff)
+ return false;
/*
* We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or set
* the handoff bit. Only the first waiter can have its handoff_set
@@ -1141,7 +1153,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_sema
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
}
} else {
- atomic_long_or(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
+ /* see RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS in rwsem_try_write_lock() */
}

/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
--

Hillf Danton

unread,
Oct 30, 2023, 8:44:51 AM10/30/23
to Jason Gunthorpe, syzbot, io...@lists.linux.dev, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, robin....@arm.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, Waiman Long, wi...@kernel.org
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 20:54:13 +0800 Hillf Danton <hda...@sina.com>
The fix above does not cover the case that signaled waiter tries to acquire
rwsem with RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS set ending up with uaf, and again fix it by
bailing out if killed.

--- x/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ y/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -1190,6 +1190,8 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_sema
schedule_preempt_disabled();
lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
set_current_state(state);
+ if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+ goto out_nolock;
trylock_again:
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
}

And the updated fix looks like the diff below.

--- x/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ y/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
{
struct rwsem_waiter *first = rwsem_first_waiter(sem);
long count, new;
+ int set_waiter;

lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);

@@ -623,6 +624,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
return false;
}

+ set_waiter = 0;
new = count;

if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
@@ -631,11 +633,18 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
* if it is an RT task or wait in the wait queue
* for too long.
*/
- if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
- !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)))
+ if (has_handoff)
return false;
-
- new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+ if (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
+ !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)) {
+ if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)
+ return false;
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
+ set_waiter = 1;
+ } else {
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+ new |= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
+ }
} else {
new |= RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED;
new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
@@ -656,6 +665,8 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
return false;
}

+ if (set_waiter)
+ return false;
/*
* Have rwsem_try_write_lock() fully imply rwsem_del_waiter() on
* success.
@@ -1141,7 +1152,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_sema
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
}
} else {
- atomic_long_or(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
+ /* see RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS in rwsem_try_write_lock() */
}

/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
@@ -1178,6 +1189,8 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_sema
schedule_preempt_disabled();
lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
set_current_state(state);
+ if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+ goto out_nolock;
trylock_again:
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
}
--

syzbot

unread,
Jan 29, 2024, 5:32:20 AMJan 29
to syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Auto-closing this bug as obsolete.
Crashes did not happen for a while, no reproducer and no activity.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages