[syzbot] possible deadlock in btrfs_search_slot_get_root
7 views
Skip to first unread message
syzbot
Nov 6, 2022, 6:49:54 PM11/6/22
to c...@fb.com, dst...@suse.com, jo...@toxicpanda.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=163a7961880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4ef9e5...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
BTRFS info (device loop5): enabling ssd optimizations
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.5/14151 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000c916fad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x54/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5576
but task is already holding lock:
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read_nested+0x64/0x84 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1624
__btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x74/0x338 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1637
btrfs_search_slot+0x1b0/0xfd8 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1944
__lookup_free_space_inode fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:69 [inline]
lookup_free_space_inode+0xc4/0x2ac fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:116
btrfs_remove_free_space_inode+0x88/0x1e8 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:230
cleanup_free_space_cache_v1 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4079 [inline]
btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0xc0/0x238 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4107
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x238/0x380 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3251
open_ctree+0xd28/0xf84 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3732
btrfs_fill_super+0xc0/0x174 fs/btrfs/super.c:1456
btrfs_mount_root+0x4a4/0x558 fs/btrfs/super.c:1824
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1043 [inline]
vfs_kern_mount+0xe0/0x140 fs/namespace.c:1073
btrfs_mount+0x20c/0x5e8 fs/btrfs/super.c:1884
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
do_new_mount+0x1dc/0x4e4 fs/namespace.c:3040
path_mount+0x358/0x914 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1826 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1948 [inline]
start_transaction+0x360/0x944 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:683
btrfs_join_transaction+0x30/0x40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:795
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x50/0x140 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6103
btrfs_update_time+0x1c0/0x1e8 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6145
inode_update_time fs/inode.c:1872 [inline]
touch_atime+0x1f0/0x4a8 fs/inode.c:1945
file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2516 [inline]
btrfs_file_mmap+0x50/0x88 fs/btrfs/file.c:2407
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
__do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
__se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x3a8/0x4bc fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xa08/0xa64 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(sb_internal#2);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.5/14151:
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 14151 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x3a8/0x4bc fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xa08/0xa64 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=163a7961880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4ef9e5...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
BTRFS info (device loop5): enabling ssd optimizations
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.5/14151 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000c916fad8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x54/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5576
but task is already holding lock:
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_read_nested+0x64/0x84 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1624
__btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x74/0x338 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1637
btrfs_search_slot+0x1b0/0xfd8 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1944
__lookup_free_space_inode fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:69 [inline]
lookup_free_space_inode+0xc4/0x2ac fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:116
btrfs_remove_free_space_inode+0x88/0x1e8 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:230
cleanup_free_space_cache_v1 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4079 [inline]
btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0xc0/0x238 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:4107
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x238/0x380 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3251
open_ctree+0xd28/0xf84 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3732
btrfs_fill_super+0xc0/0x174 fs/btrfs/super.c:1456
btrfs_mount_root+0x4a4/0x558 fs/btrfs/super.c:1824
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1043 [inline]
vfs_kern_mount+0xe0/0x140 fs/namespace.c:1073
btrfs_mount+0x20c/0x5e8 fs/btrfs/super.c:1884
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
do_new_mount+0x1dc/0x4e4 fs/namespace.c:3040
path_mount+0x358/0x914 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #1 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1826 [inline]
sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1948 [inline]
start_transaction+0x360/0x944 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:683
btrfs_join_transaction+0x30/0x40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:795
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x50/0x140 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6103
btrfs_update_time+0x1c0/0x1e8 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6145
inode_update_time fs/inode.c:1872 [inline]
touch_atime+0x1f0/0x4a8 fs/inode.c:1945
file_accessed include/linux/fs.h:2516 [inline]
btrfs_file_mmap+0x50/0x88 fs/btrfs/file.c:2407
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2192 [inline]
mmap_region+0x7fc/0xc14 mm/mmap.c:1752
do_mmap+0x644/0x97c mm/mmap.c:1540
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe8/0x1d0 mm/util.c:552
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1cc/0x278 mm/mmap.c:1586
__do_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:28 [inline]
__se_sys_mmap arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x58/0x6c arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c:21
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x3a8/0x4bc fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xa08/0xa64 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-root-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(sb_internal#2);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.5/14151:
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
#0: ffff00011e1cfa48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 14151 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2053
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__might_fault+0x7c/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5577
_copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:134 [inline]
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:160 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_rootref+0x3a8/0x4bc fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3203
btrfs_ioctl+0xa08/0xa64 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5556
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0xd0/0x140 fs/ioctl.c:856
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:581
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot
Nov 6, 2022, 7:04:45 PM11/6/22
to c...@fb.com, dst...@suse.com, jo...@toxicpanda.com, linux...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15a085a9880000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=115dc1a9880000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e4f681f3b5be/mount_0.gz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4ef9e5...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
BTRFS info (device loop0): using xxhash64 (xxhash64-generic) checksum algorithm
BTRFS info (device loop0): using free space tree
BTRFS info (device loop0): enabling ssd optimizations
ffff0000c02525d8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x54/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5576
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
commit_fs_roots+0x1f0/0x33c fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1459
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x89c/0x12d8 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2343
flush_space+0x66c/0x738 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:786
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x43c/0x4e0 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1059
process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860
-> #2 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
btrfs_record_root_in_trans fs/btrfs/transaction.c:516 [inline]
start_transaction+0x248/0x944 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:752
btrfs_start_transaction+0x34/0x44 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:781
btrfs_create_common+0xf0/0x1b4 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6651
btrfs_create+0x8c/0xb0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6697
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
path_openat+0x804/0x11c4 fs/namei.c:3688
do_filp_open+0xdc/0x1b8 fs/namei.c:3718
do_sys_openat2+0xb8/0x22c fs/open.c:1313
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1329 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1345 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1340 [inline]
__arm64_sys_openat+0xb0/0xe0 fs/open.c:1340
&mm->mmap_lock --> &fs_info->reloc_mutex --> btrfs-root-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
#0: ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
#0: ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
#0: ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 3029 Comm: syz-executor307 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
HEAD commit: bbed346d5a96 Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3a4a45d2d827c1e
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=154649a9880000
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4ef9e52e464c6ff47d9d
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=115dc1a9880000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e8e91bc79312/disk-bbed346d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c1cb3fb3b77e/vmlinux-bbed346d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4ef9e5...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
BTRFS info (device loop0): using free space tree
BTRFS info (device loop0): enabling ssd optimizations
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor307/3029 is trying to acquire lock:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
ffff0000c02525d8 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x54/0xb4 mm/memory.c:5576
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
down_read_nested+0x64/0x84 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1624
__btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x74/0x338 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1637
btrfs_search_slot+0x1b0/0xfd8 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1944
btrfs_update_root+0x6c/0x5a0 fs/btrfs/root-tree.c:132
__btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x74/0x338 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1637
btrfs_search_slot+0x1b0/0xfd8 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1944
commit_fs_roots+0x1f0/0x33c fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1459
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x89c/0x12d8 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2343
flush_space+0x66c/0x738 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:786
btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x43c/0x4e0 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1059
process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:860
-> #2 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
btrfs_record_root_in_trans fs/btrfs/transaction.c:516 [inline]
start_transaction+0x248/0x944 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:752
btrfs_start_transaction+0x34/0x44 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:781
btrfs_create_common+0xf0/0x1b4 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6651
btrfs_create+0x8c/0xb0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:6697
lookup_open fs/namei.c:3413 [inline]
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3481 [inline]
path_openat+0x804/0x11c4 fs/namei.c:3688
do_filp_open+0xdc/0x1b8 fs/namei.c:3718
do_sys_openat2+0xb8/0x22c fs/open.c:1313
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1329 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1345 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1340 [inline]
__arm64_sys_openat+0xb0/0xe0 fs/open.c:1340
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor307/3029:
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
#0: ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:134 [inline]
#0: ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:140 [inline]
#0: ffff0000c958a608 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x13c/0x1c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:279
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 3029 Comm: syz-executor307 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7-syzkaller-18095-gbbed346d5a96 #0
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages