[syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in delete_one_xattr (2)

[syzbot]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 2fcd07b7ccd5 mm/mprotect: Fix successful vma_merge() of ne..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16148c50c80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=56eb47529ec6fdbe
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7a278bf8bfa794494110
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fe4d914ffdbb/disk-2fcd07b7.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/590339659f6c/vmlinux-2fcd07b7.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f0ecc3d4d7e9/bzImage-2fcd07b7.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7a278b...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

REISERFS (device loop2): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-syzkaller-12018-g2fcd07b7ccd5 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/12978 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888070d27ac0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
ffff888070d27ac0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xattr_rmdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:106 [inline]
ffff888070d27ac0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_one_xattr+0x141/0x2d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:338

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888031d2a3e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
ffff888031d2a3e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x6fd/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:309

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:127 [inline]
open_xa_dir+0x127/0x840 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:152
xattr_lookup+0x21/0x3d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:395
reiserfs_xattr_get+0x118/0xa80 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:677
security_get+0x83/0xb0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c:19
__vfs_getxattr+0x138/0x1a0 fs/xattr.c:426
cap_inode_need_killpriv+0x40/0x60 security/commoncap.c:301
security_inode_need_killpriv+0x44/0xa0 security/security.c:1492
dentry_needs_remove_privs fs/inode.c:1968 [inline]
__file_remove_privs+0x3a0/0x640 fs/inode.c:1999
__generic_file_write_iter+0xc7/0x500 mm/filemap.c:3999
generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:4086
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1851 [inline]
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
vfs_write+0x9ed/0xe10 fs/read_write.c:584
ksys_write+0x12b/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#21){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x92/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:758 [inline]
lock_two_nondirectories+0xf0/0x110 fs/inode.c:1122
vfs_rename+0x9ac/0x17a0 fs/namei.c:4742
do_renameat2+0xb62/0xc90 fs/namei.c:4923
__do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4956 [inline]
__se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:4953 [inline]
__x64_sys_renameat2+0xe8/0x120 fs/namei.c:4953
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x670 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
xattr_rmdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:106 [inline]
delete_one_xattr+0x141/0x2d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:338
reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x70e/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:311
reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x20/0xa0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:364
reiserfs_evict_inode+0x2e7/0x540 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:53
evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:665
iput_final fs/inode.c:1748 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x59b/0x8a0 fs/inode.c:1774
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1764
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
dentry_kill fs/dcache.c:745 [inline]
dput+0x6ac/0xe10 fs/dcache.c:913
path_put+0x31/0x70 fs/namei.c:559
path_setxattr+0xd6/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:655
__do_sys_lsetxattr fs/xattr.c:674 [inline]
__se_sys_lsetxattr fs/xattr.c:670 [inline]
__x64_sys_lsetxattr+0xc1/0x160 fs/xattr.c:670
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2 --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#21 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#21);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/2);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.2/12978:
#0: ffff888031d2a3e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
#0: ffff888031d2a3e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#8/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x6fd/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:309

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 12978 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.2.0-syzkaller-12018-g2fcd07b7ccd5 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/16/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2178
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3098 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3217 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3832 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2ec7/0x5d40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5056
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5669 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x670 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5634
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:793 [inline]
xattr_rmdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:106 [inline]
delete_one_xattr+0x141/0x2d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:338
reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x70e/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:311
reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x20/0xa0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:364
reiserfs_evict_inode+0x2e7/0x540 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:53
evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:665
iput_final fs/inode.c:1748 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x59b/0x8a0 fs/inode.c:1774
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1764
dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
dentry_kill fs/dcache.c:745 [inline]
dput+0x6ac/0xe10 fs/dcache.c:913
path_put+0x31/0x70 fs/namei.c:559
path_setxattr+0xd6/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:655
__do_sys_lsetxattr fs/xattr.c:674 [inline]
__se_sys_lsetxattr fs/xattr.c:670 [inline]
__x64_sys_lsetxattr+0xc1/0x160 fs/xattr.c:670
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7efd9908c0f9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007efd99e3b168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bd
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007efd991abf80 RCX: 00007efd9908c0f9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: 0000000020000040
RBP: 00007efd990e7ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffdc761bbef R14: 00007efd99e3b300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

[syzbot]

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit: ac9a78681b92 Linux 6.4-rc1
git tree: upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12d2a75a280000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8bc832f563d8bf38

dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7a278bf8bfa794494110
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1295e4b8280000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=140af20a280000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/09860189d36b/disk-ac9a7868.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3eb9c32c8830/vmlinux-ac9a7868.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/14b50dd219a1/bzImage-ac9a7868.xz
mounted in repro: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/10efaa5d185c/mount_0.gz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7a278b...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

overlayfs: upper fs needs to support d_type.
overlayfs: upper fs does not support tmpfile.
overlayfs: upper fs does not support RENAME_WHITEOUT.

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected

6.4.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor174/4998 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888073d4aaa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
ffff888073d4aaa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xattr_rmdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:107 [inline]
ffff888073d4aaa0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: delete_one_xattr+0x141/0x2d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:339

but task is already holding lock:

ffff888073d496c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
ffff888073d496c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x6fd/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:310

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
open_xa_root fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:128 [inline]
open_xa_dir+0x127/0x840 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:153
xattr_lookup+0x21/0x3d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:396
reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0xfb/0xb00 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:534
reiserfs_xattr_set+0x454/0x5b0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:634
trusted_set+0xa7/0xd0 fs/reiserfs/xattr_trusted.c:31
__vfs_setxattr+0x173/0x1e0 fs/xattr.c:201
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x129/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:235
__vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1d3/0x260 fs/xattr.c:296
vfs_setxattr+0x143/0x340 fs/xattr.c:322
ovl_do_setxattr fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:255 [inline]
ovl_setxattr fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:267 [inline]
ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:1332 [inline]
ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:1436 [inline]
ovl_fill_super+0x2276/0x7270 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1992
mount_nodev+0x64/0x120 fs/super.c:1426
legacy_get_tree+0x109/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x350 fs/super.c:1510
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3039 [inline]
path_mount+0x134b/0x1e40 fs/namespace.c:3369
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3382 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0x283/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568

do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x92/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:775 [inline]
vfs_rename+0x4f9/0x17a0 fs/namei.c:4821
do_renameat2+0xc04/0xd40 fs/namei.c:5002
__do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5048 [inline]
__se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5046 [inline]
__x64_sys_rename+0x81/0xa0 fs/namei.c:5046

do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3108 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3227 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3842 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2f21/0x5df0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5074
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5656
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
xattr_rmdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:107 [inline]
delete_one_xattr+0x141/0x2d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:339
reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x70e/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:312
reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x20/0xa0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:365

reiserfs_evict_inode+0x2e7/0x540 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:53
evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:665

iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x50a/0x740 fs/inode.c:1773
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763

dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
dentry_kill fs/dcache.c:745 [inline]
dput+0x6ac/0xe10 fs/dcache.c:913

cleanup_mnt+0x286/0x3d0 fs/namespace.c:1176
task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
do_exit+0xad3/0x2960 kernel/exit.c:871
do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1021
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1032 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1030 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3e/0x50 kernel/exit.c:1030

do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:

&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/2 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#6 --> &type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----

lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/2);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor174/4998:
#0: ffff888073d496c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
#0: ffff888073d496c0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/3){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x6fd/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:310

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4998 Comm: syz-executor174 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/14/2023

Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106

check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3108 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3227 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3842 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2f21/0x5df0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5074
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5656
down_write_nested+0x96/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:810 [inline]
xattr_rmdir fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:107 [inline]
delete_one_xattr+0x141/0x2d0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:339
reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x70e/0x9a0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:312
reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x20/0xa0 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:365

reiserfs_evict_inode+0x2e7/0x540 fs/reiserfs/inode.c:53
evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:665

iput_final fs/inode.c:1747 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x50a/0x740 fs/inode.c:1773
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1763

dentry_unlink_inode+0x2b1/0x460 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3c0/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
dentry_kill fs/dcache.c:745 [inline]
dput+0x6ac/0xe10 fs/dcache.c:913

cleanup_mnt+0x286/0x3d0 fs/namespace.c:1176
task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
do_exit+0xad3/0x2960 kernel/exit.c:871
do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:1021
__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1032 [inline]
__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1030 [inline]
__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3e/0x50 kernel/exit.c:1030

do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

RIP: 0033:0x7f73aae31bb9
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f73aae31b8f.
RSP: 002b:00007fff0a6df368 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f73aaea8330 RCX: 00007f73aae31bb9
RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffffffffffffc0 R09: 00007f73aaea2e40
R10: 00007f73aaea2


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

[syzbot]

syzbot has bisected this issue to:

commit 9df085f3c9a2d4658a9fe323d70c200aa00ede93
Author: Amir Goldstein <amir...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Sep 3 06:12:09 2018 +0000

ovl: relax requirement for non null uuid of lower fs

bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=1711e75a680000
start commit: ac9a78681b92 Linux 6.4-rc1
git tree: upstream
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=1491e75a680000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1091e75a680000

kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8bc832f563d8bf38
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7a278bf8bfa794494110

syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1295e4b8280000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=140af20a280000

Reported-by: syzbot+7a278b...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 9df085f3c9a2 ("ovl: relax requirement for non null uuid of lower fs")

For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection

[Amir Goldstein]

[CC the developers who marked reiserfs for deprecation]

Resierfs AND moving files underneath overlayfs.
Not worth much investigation time IMO.
If I could tell syzbot, ignore this report, I would.

Resierfs deletes xattrs from reiserfs_evict_inode() context,
which seems to be related to the lockdep warning.

Thanks,
Amir.

[syzbot]

Auto-closing this bug as obsolete.
No recent activity, existing reproducers are no longer triggering the issue.